The Epigenetics Dilemma
Open accessAbstract
This special issue of Genes demonstrates clearly that research in epigenetics has proceeded at a very rapid pace in the last decade [...]
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
ncRNAs have already provided a lot of evidence for proving their biological roles not only in normal cells and tissues but also in disease.
“Other elements, such as transposons and repetitive and unexpressed intergenic sequences, need to be researched further; on the other hand, ncRNAs have already provided a lot of evidence for proving their biological roles not only in normal cells and tissues but also in disease [107,117].”
From Revisiting Epigenetics Fundamentals and Its Biomedical Implications (2024) · cites this paper as [107]
In “The Epigenetics Dilemma” (page not provided), the authors describe evidence linking non-coding RNA to phenotypic changes as anecdotal and call for further study. That is contrary to the attributed claim that substantial evidence has already proved ncRNAs’ biological roles in normal tissues and disease; the passage does not discuss disease. (LLM, conf=0.83)
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 8 · Cited by 14
- Authors
- Grunau, C., Le Luyer, J., Laporte, M., & Joly, D.
- Affiliations
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
- IFREMER/Centre du Pacifique, Département Ressources Biologiques Environnement, Unité Ressources Marines en Polynésie Française, UMR 241 Écosystèmes Insulaires Océaniens, BP 49, 98719 Taravao, Tahiti, Polynésie Française
- Université Laval (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Grunau, Christoph
- Venue
- Genes
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-12-23
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 23
- ISSN
- 2073-4425 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7016732
- OpenAlex
- W2995549549
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 8
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2021: 3 · 2018: 1
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Genes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Institutional Archive of Ifremer (French Research Institute for Exploitation of the Sea) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Syndromes and Imprinting
- Keywords
- epigenetics
- MeSH terms
- Humans, DNA Methylation, Epigenesis, Genetic, Epigenomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
