Cited by 7Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesGenomics and Rare DiseasesCongenital limb and hand anomalies

Chromosomal Microarray Analysis Identifies a Novel SALL1 Deletion, Supporting the Association of Haploinsufficiency with a Mild Phenotype of Townes–Brocks Syndrome

Open access
Innoceta, Anna Maria, Olivucci, Giulia, Parmeggiani, Giulia, Scarano, Emanuela, Pragliola, Antonella, Graziano, Claudio·2023·Genes

Abstract

SALL1 heterozygous pathogenic variants cause Townes–Brocks syndrome (TBS), a condition with variable clinical presentation. The main features are a stenotic or imperforate anus, dysplastic ears, and thumb malformations, and other common concerns are hearing impairments, foot malformations, and renal and heart defects. Most of the pathogenic SALL1 variants are nonsense and frameshift, likely escaping nonsense-mediated mRNA decay and causing disease via a dominant-negative mechanism. Haploinsufficiency may result in mild phenotypes, but only four families with distinct SALL1 deletions have been reported to date, with a few more being of larger size and also affecting neighboring genes. We report on a family with autosomal dominant hearing impairment and mild anal and skeletal anomalies, in whom a novel 350 kb SALL1 deletion, spanning exon 1 and the upstream region, was identified by array comparative genomic hybridization. We review the clinical findings of known individuals with SALL1 deletions and point out that the overall phenotype is milder, especially when compared with individuals who carry the recurrent p.Arg276Ter mutation, but with a possible higher risk of developmental delay. Chromosomal microarray analysis is still a valuable tool in the identification of atypical/mild TBS cases, which are likely underestimated.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/genes14020258

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The molecular explanation underlying phenotypic evidence in animal models and phenotype-genotype correlations in TBS patients remained unclear to date.

    “However to date, the molecular explanation underlying phenotypic evidence in animal models 25,29 and phenotypegenotype correlations in TBS patients 47,60,32 remained unclear.”

    From Tetramerisation governs SALL transcription factor function in development and disease (2025) · cites this paper as [32]

    The Discussion says genotype–phenotype correlations in TBS patients have been debated and that more functional characterization is needed. But the paper also offers a molecular explanation—dominant-negative SALL1 variants for typical TBS and haploinsufficiency for milder phenotypes—so it does not support an unqualified statement that the explanation remained unclear. The animal-model evidence is attached to other citations in the citing sentence. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 30 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [5]Kohlhase J. Townes-Brocks Syndrome GeneReviews® Adam M.P. University of Washington Seattle, WA, USA 2007 20301618
  2. [12]Nishinakamura R. Matsumoto Y. Nakao K. Nakamura K. Sato A. Copeland N.G. Gilbert D.J. Jenkins N.A. Scully S. Lacey D.L. Murine homolog of SALL1 is essential for ureteric bud invasion in kidney development Development 2001 128 3105 3115 10.1242/dev.128.16.3105 11688560 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Innoceta, A. M., Olivucci, G., Parmeggiani, G., Scarano, E., Pragliola, A., & Graziano, C.
Affiliations
  • Medical Genetics Unit, AUSL Romagna, 47522 Cesena, Italy
  • IRCCS Azienda Ospedliero-Universitaria di Bologna Policlinico di Sant'Orsola (IT)
  • Rare Diseases Unit, Department of Pediatrics, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
Corresponding author
Graziano, Claudio
Venue
Genes
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-01-19
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
258
ISSN
2073-4425 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4317425690
Cited by
7
References
30
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1
FWCI
0.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Wellcome Trust (WT223718/Z/21/Z)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology › Congenital limb and hand anomalies
Keywords
SALL1, haploinsufficiency, mild phenotype, anal anomalies, skeletal abnormalities, developmental delay, nonsense-mediated mRNA decay, chromosomal microarray analysis
MeSH terms
Abnormalities, Multiple, Anus, Imperforate, Hearing Loss, Sensorineural, Humans, Phenotype, Syndrome, Thumb, Transcription Factors, Microarray Analysis, Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Haploinsufficiency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review