Cited by 22Mobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsDigital Mental Health InterventionsObesity, Physical Activity, Diet

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Can Digital Technologies Be Useful for Weight Loss in Individuals with Overweight or Obesity? A Systematic Review

Open access

Abstract

Digital technologies have greatly developed and impacted several aspects of life, including health and lifestyle. Activity tracking, mobile applications, and devices may also provide messages and goals to motivate adopting healthy behaviors, namely physical activity and dietary changes. This review aimed to assess the effectiveness of digital resources in supporting behavior changes, and thus influencing weight loss, in people with overweight or obesity. A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023403364). Randomized Controlled Trials published from the database’s inception to 8 November 2023 and focused on digital-based technologies aimed at increasing physical activity for the purpose of weight loss, with or without changes in diet, were considered eligible. In total, 1762 studies were retrieved and 31 met the inclusion criteria. Although they differed in the type of technology used and in their design, two-thirds of the studies reported significantly greater weight loss among electronic device users than controls. Many of these studies reported tailored or specialist-guided interventions. The use of digital technologies may be useful to support weight-loss interventions for people with overweight or obesity. Personalized feedback can increase the effectiveness of new technologies in motivating behavior changes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/healthcare12060670

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 82 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 22

Metadata

Authors
Protano, C., De Giorgi, A., Valeriani, F., Mazzeo, E., Zanni, S., Cofone, L., D’Ancona, G., Hasnaoui, A., Pindinello, I., Sabato, M., Ubaldi, F., Volpini, V., Romano Spica, V., Vitali, M., & Gallè, F.
Affiliations
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
  • Department of Public Health and Infectious Diseases, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
  • Foro Italico University of Rome (IT)
  • National Engineering School of Tunis (TN)
  • Department of Movement, Human, and Health Sciences, University of Rome Foro Italico, 00135 Rome, Italy
  • Department of Medical, Movement and Wellbeing Sciences, University of Naples Parthenope, 80133 Naples, Italy
Corresponding author
Valeriani, Federica
Venue
Healthcare
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-03-16
Volume
12
Issue
6
Pages
670
ISSN
2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392916806
Cited by
21
References
82
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 2
FWCI
1.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (Parthenope University of Naples) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
Keywords
digital health technologies, weight loss, obesity, overweight, physical activity, mobile health apps, activity monitoring, behavior change, personalized feedback, dietary change, weight loss interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review