Defining End-of-Life Preparedness: A Dyadic Qualitative Study of Hispanic Patients with Advanced Breast Cancer and Their Caregivers
Open accessAbstract
Background/Objectives: End-of-life (EOL) preparedness remains critically understudied among Hispanic patients with advanced breast cancer and their patient–caregiver dyads, despite evidence that preparedness significantly influences quality of life, care decisions, and caregiver well-being. This study aimed to explore how Hispanic patient–caregiver dyads conceptualize and experience EOL preparedness. Methods: A qualitative descriptive design was employed, guided by the Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework, which highlights patient and caregiver characteristics, relationship processes, individual and relational outcomes, the cancer care trajectory, and the broader social context as interrelated influences on dyadic experience. Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted in Spanish with 11 metastatic patient–caregiver dyads (n = 22 participants) recruited through Ponce Health Sciences University and the Ponce Research Institute in Puerto Rico. Data were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis in NVivo 15, with themes interpreted through the framework’s components. Results: Six interdependent themes of EOL preparedness were identified: psychological and emotional, spiritual, informational, practical, physical, and caregiver role preparedness. Spiritual preparedness, grounded in faith, prayer, and surrender to divine will, functioned as the foundational axis organizing all other themes. Preparedness was dynamic and turning-point-driven, challenged anew at each stage of disease progression. Financial vulnerability, caregiver invisibility within formal care systems, and insufficient anticipatory information were identified as primary barriers. Family support and faith communities were the most consistently cited facilitators. Conclusions: The findings yield the first grounded, dyadic conceptualization of EOL preparedness with Hispanic advanced breast cancer patient–caregiver dyads. We propose a formal definition positioning preparedness as a dynamic, multidimensional, relationally embedded, and spiritually anchored process that is fundamentally interdependent between patient and caregiver. These results directly inform the development of a culturally tailored, dyadic EOL preparedness intervention for this underserved population.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Rosario-Ramos, L. P., Quiles-Bengochea, C., Laporte-Estela, G., Rivera, N., Graulau-Burgos, A. M., Peña-Vargas, C., Hernández-Torres, R., Cortes-Castro, C., Rodriguez-Castro, Z., Castro-Figueroa, E. M., & Torres-Blasco, N.
- Affiliations
- Ponce Health Sciences University (PR)
- Institut Interdisciplinaire de l'Innovation (FR)
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US)
- Ponce Research Institute, Ponce, PR 00717, USA
- School of Behavioral and Brain Sciences, Ponce Health Sciences University, Ponce, PR 00717, USA
- Corresponding author
- Rosario-Ramos, Lianel P.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Healthcare
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2026-08-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2471
- ISSN
- 2227-9032 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC13511917
- OpenAlex
- W7202093428
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Healthcare (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Cancer Institute (U01CA290613)
- Susan G. Komen Breast Cancer Foundation (ASP241266630)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Palliative and Oncologic Care
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
- Keywords
- advanced breast cancer, metastatic breast cancer, patient-caregiver dyads, Hispanic patients, faith and spirituality, financial vulnerability, family support, religious communities, culturally tailored interventions, Puerto Rico
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review