The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021
Abstract
The two waves of reflexivity in archaeology are the identity politics of archaeologists and stakeholder politics. These social issues are considered in this article through the perspective of three African archaeological journals produced from 2014 to 2021. Identity politics is examined through a quantitative analysis of authorship, book reviewing, and the countries covered. I conclude that parity of gender authorship—assuming 61% male and 39% female archaeologists—has been achieved by the African Archaeological Review, Journal of African Archaeology, and Azania. In book reviewing, this is less so. The geographical coverage across the three journals shows lacunae. Stakeholder politics is most visible in book reviews and special issues. Journal ethics and goals and the final topics of open access and other ways of broadening the pool of authors, reviewers, and accessibility are offered.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“A recent study of female first authorship rates in African archaeology journals by Cheryl Claassen (2023) also found that female first authorship rates in AAR were quite similar to those for both Azania (38-40%) and Journal of African Archaeology (39-40%) from 2014 to 2021.”
From The African Archaeological Review Turns Forty: Some Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future (2023) · cites this paper as Claassen, 2023
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Doing Archaeology in a Turbulent Time
Ogundiran, A. (2021) · African Archaeological Review · doi:10.1007/s10437-021-09460-8 · Cited by 3
Research works printed but not linked: 30
- Gero, G., and Conkey, M. (1991). Engendering Archaeology: Women and Prehistory, Wiley-Blackwell.
- Claassen, C. (1992). Exploring Gender through Archaeology, Prehistory Press.
- Claassen, C. (1994). Women in Archaeology, University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Claassen, C. (1996). Women in Prehistory: North and Central America, University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Witelson, 2018, Frogs or people: Dorothea Bleek and a genealogy of ideas in rock art research, Azania Archaeol. Res. Afr., 53, 185
- Jakoubek, 2022, On Food, Pots, Gender, Iron, and Archaeological Theory: Interview with Professor Randi Haaland, Afr. Archaeol. Rev., 39, 113, 10.1007/s10437-021-09468-0 · DOI
- Kent, S. (1998). Gender in African Prehistory, AltaMira Press.
- Logan, 2014, Special Issue: Comparing Craft and Culinary Practice in Africa, Afr. Archaeol. Rev., 31, 87, 10.1007/s10437-014-9162-7 · DOI
- Lane, 2015, Editorial: Azania at Fifty, Azania, 50, 425, 10.1080/0067270X.2015.1108050 · DOI · Paper page
- Ulm, 2021, Editorial, Aust. Archaeol., 87, 227, 10.1080/03122417.2021.2001146 · DOI
- Hendon, 2021, Diferencias de género de autores y revisores antes y después del inicio de la pandemia, Lat. Am. Antiq., 32, 229, 10.1017/laq.2021.42 · DOI
- MacDonald, 2018, Editorial, Azania, 53, 1, 10.1080/0067270X.2018.1438876 · DOI
- Ogundiran, 2019, Editor’s Inaugural Remarks, Afr. Archaeol. Rev., 36, 1, 10.1007/s10437-019-09329-x · DOI
- Anderson, 2018, Special Issue: African rock art and digital practice, Afr. Archaeol. Rev., 35, 155, 10.1007/s10437-018-9302-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 2020, Archaeological approaches to slavery and unfree labour in Africa, Azania, 55, 417, 10.1080/0067270X.2020.1819696 · DOI
- Apoh, 2020, Why forget us? Developing the Three-Town enslaved relics as alternative sites of commemoration in southeastern Ghana, Azania, 55, 458, 10.1080/0067270X.2020.1841964 · DOI
- Ashley, 2016, Special issue: Mobility and African archaeology, Azania, 51, 417, 10.1080/0067270X.2016.1233766 · DOI
- Anderson, 2018, Introduction to Special Issue: African rock art and digital practice, Afr. Archaeol. Rev., 35, 155, 10.1007/s10437-018-9302-6 · DOI · Paper page
- Thondhlana, 2022, The Politics of Knowledge Production: Training and Practice of Archaeological Science in Africa, Afr. Archaeol. Rev., 39, 461, 10.1007/s10437-022-09491-9 · DOI · Paper page
- Giblin, 2014, Introduction: De-centring ethical assumptions by re-centring ethical debate in African archaeology, Azania, 49, 131, 10.1080/0067270X.2014.904979 · DOI
- MacDonald, 2019, Editorial, Azania, 54, 1, 10.1080/0067270X.2019.1583464 · DOI
- MacDonald, 2021, Editorial, Azania, 56, 1, 10.1080/0067270X.2021.1887674 · DOI
- (2022, October 10). Taylor and Francis. Available online: https://www.tandfonline.com/openaccess/openselect.
- Trubitt, 2020, Reflections of the Outgoing Journal Editor, Horiz. Tradit., 62, 6
- 2020, Who Writes about Archaeology: An Intersectional Study of Authorship in Archaeological Journals, Am. Antiq., 85, 407, 10.1017/aaq.2020.28 · DOI · Paper page
- Ross, 2020, Special issue Challenging metanarratives: The past lives in the present, Archaeol. Ocean., 55, 65, 10.1002/arco.5196 · DOI
- Venovcevs, 2022, Living with Heritage: Involuntary Entanglements of the Anthropocene—An Introduction, J. Contemp. Archaeol., 9, 1, 10.1558/jca.23988 · DOI
- Holtorf, 2016, Forum: Are we all archaeologists now?, J. Contemp. Archaeol., 2, 217, 10.1558/jca.v2i2.28463 · DOI
- Braswell, 2016, Note from the Editors, Lat. Am. Antiq., 27, 147, 10.7183/1045-6635.27.2.147 · DOI
- Braswell, 2020, Editors’ Corner, Lat. Am. Antiq., 31, 223, 10.1017/laq.2020.46 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The African Archaeological Review Turns Forty: Some Reflections on the Past, Present, and Future
Gokee, C., & Ogundiran, A. (2023) · African Archaeological Review · doi:10.1007/s10437-023-09521-0 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Claassen, C.
- Venue
- Humans
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-01-30
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 25-35
- ISSN
- 2673-9461
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/humans3010004
- The paper
- Claassen, C. (2023). African Archaeological Journals and Social Issues 2014–2021. Humans. https://doi.org/10.3390/humans3010004