How Technology in Care at Home Affects Patient Self-Care and Self-Management: A Scoping Review
Open accessAbstract
The use of technology in care at home has potential benefits such as improved quality of care. This includes greater focus on the patients’ role in managing their health and increased patient involvement in the care process. The objective of this scoping review is to analyse the existing evidence for effects of technology in home-based care on patients’ self-care and self-management. Using suitable search terms we searched the databases of Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Cinahl, Picarta and NIVEL dating from 2002 to 2012. Thirty-three studies (six review studies and twenty-seven individual studies) were selected. Effects were extracted from each study and were classified. In almost all the studies, the concepts self-care and self-management are not clearly defined or operationalized. Therefore, based on a meta-analysis, we made a new classification of outcome measures, with hierarchical levels: (1) competence (2) illness-management (3) independence (social participation, autonomy). In general, patient outcomes appear to be positive or promising, but most studies were pilot studies. We did not find strong evidence that technology in care at home has (a positive) effect on patient self-care and self-management according to the above classification. Future research is needed to clarify how technology can be used to maximize its benefits.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of eHealth in daily practice.
“Moreover, there is still uncertainty about their effectiveness in daily practice [2,4,5].”
From Lessons Learned From a Living Lab on the Broad Adoption of eHealth in Primary Health Care (2018) · cites this paper as [5]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 51 · Cited by 61
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [25]Finkelstein J. Lapshin O. Castro H. Cha E. Provance P.G. Home-based physical telerehabilitation in patients with multiple sclerosis: A pilot study J. Rehabil. Res. Dev. 2008 45 1361 1374 10.1682/JRRD.2008.01.0001 19319760 · DOI
- Authors
- Peeters, J., Wiegers, T., & Friele, R.
- Affiliations
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NL)
- Tilburg University (NL)
- Corresponding author
- Peeters, José
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2013-10-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5541-5564
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC3863859
- OpenAlex
- W2140048337
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 51
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 6.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Research portal (Tilburg University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
- Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Keywords
- home care technology, self-care, self-management, home care, patient involvement, illness management, patient independence, social participation (health and rehabilitation), autonomy, patient competence
- MeSH terms
- Home Care Services, Humans, Self Care, Biomedical Technology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review