Cited by 656COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutE-Learning and COVID-19

Mitigating the psychological impact of covid-19 on healthcare workers: a digital learning package

Open access
Blake, Holly, Bermingham, Fiona, Johnson, Graham, Tabner, Andrew·2020·International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health

Abstract

The coronavirus pandemic (COVID-19) will undoubtedly have psychological impacts for healthcare workers, which could be sustained; frontline workers will be particularly at risk. Actions are needed to mitigate the impacts of COVID-19 on mental health by protecting and promoting the psychological wellbeing of healthcare workers during and after the outbreak. We developed and evaluated a digital learning package using Agile methodology within the first three weeks of UK outbreak. This e-package includes evidence-based guidance, support and signposting relating to psychological wellbeing for all UK healthcare employees. A three-step rapid development process included public involvement activities (PPIs) (STEP 1), content and technical development with iterative peer review (STEP 2), and delivery and evaluation (STEP 3). The package outlines the actions that team leaders can take to provide psychologically safe spaces for staff, together with guidance on communication and reducing social stigma, peer and family support, signposting others through psychological first aid (PFA), self-care strategies (e.g., rest, work breaks, sleep, shift work, fatigue, healthy lifestyle behaviours), and managing emotions (e.g., moral injury, coping, guilt, grief, fear, anxiety, depression, preventing burnout and psychological trauma). The e-package includes advice from experts in mental wellbeing as well as those with direct pandemic experiences from the frontline, as well as signposting to public mental health guidance. Rapid delivery in STEP 3 was achieved via direct emails through professional networks and social media. Evaluation included assessment of fidelity and implementation qualities. Essential content was identified through PPIs (n = 97) and peer review (n = 10) in STEPS 1 and 2. The most important messages to convey were deemed to be normalisation of psychological responses during a crisis, and encouragement of self-care and help-seeking behaviour. Within 7 days of completion, the package had been accessed 17,633 times, and healthcare providers had confirmed immediate adoption within their health and wellbeing provisions. Evaluation (STEP 3, n = 55) indicated high user satisfaction with content, usability and utility. Assessment of implementation qualities indicated that the package was perceived to be usable, practical, low cost and low burden. Our digital support package on ‘psychological wellbeing for healthcare workers’ is free to use, has been positively evaluated and was highly accessed within one week of release. It is available here: Supplementary Materials. This package was deemed to be appropriate, meaningful and useful for the needs of UK healthcare workers. We recommend provision of this e-package to healthcare workers alongside wider strategies to support their psychological wellbeing during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijerph17092997

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 656

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]Kluge H.H.P. WHO Regional Director for Europe—Statement to the Press: Physical and Mental Health Key to Resilience during COVID-19 Pandemic WHO Copenhagen, Denmark 2020
  2. [29]Blake H. Bermingham F. Psychological wellbeing for healthcare workers: Mitigating the impact of COVID-19 Available online: https://www.nottingham.ac.uk/toolkits/play_22794 (accessed on 17 April 2020) PMC7246821 32357424

Authors
Blake, H., Bermingham, F., Johnson, G., & Tabner, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Leicester (GB)
  • Royal Derby Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Blake, Holly
Venue
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-04-26
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
2997
ISSN
1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3020320167
Cited by
656
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 91 · 2022: 187 · 2021: 193 · 2020: 94 · 2017: 1
FWCI
56.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Repository@Nottingham (University of Nottingham) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Education › E-Learning and COVID-19
Keywords
COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare workers, psychological well-being, mental health, psychological first aid, self-care, moral injury, burnout, psychological trauma, stigma, peer support, help-seeking, rapid development, citizen participation, implementation evaluation, frontline workers, agile methods, online learning, user satisfaction, usability, implementation fidelity
MeSH terms
Betacoronavirus, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Adaptation, Psychological, Anxiety, Burnout, Professional, Delivery of Health Care, Depression, Disease Outbreaks, Health Personnel, Humans, Mental Health, Pneumonia, Viral, Stress, Psychological, Coronavirus, Coronavirus Infections, Pandemics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review