The Relationship between Social Anxiety, Smartphone Use, Dispositional Trust, and Problematic Smartphone Use: A Moderated Mediation Model
Open accessAbstract
Background: The pervasiveness of smartphones has raised concerns about an increase in the prevalence of problematic smartphone use (PSU), which depends on a set of psychological and behavioral risk factors. Previous research has yielded mixed results on factors predicting PSU, including social anxiety and trust. In particular, the role of trust remained largely unexplored. In the present study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between social anxiety and PSU, via the mediating role of time spent on the phone, and to explore the moderating role of dispositional trust toward others, by using a moderated mediation model with PSU as the outcome. Methods: A total of 240 young adults (Mage = 23.33, SD = 3.90, 50% male) answered an online questionnaire, which included the 12-item Social Anxiety Scale, a question on the daily duration of smartphone use, a single-item measure of dispositional trust, and the 10-item Smartphone Addiction Scale Short Version. Gender and occupational status were included as covariates. Results: Social anxiety was significantly and positively related to PSU; however, smartphone use did not mediate this relationship. Although the relationship between smartphone use and PSU was significant and positive, the link between social anxiety and smartphone use was not. Dispositional trust moderated and strengthened the direct relationships between social anxiety and PSU as well as smartphone use and PSU. Conclusions. Heavy smartphone users as well as socially anxious individuals, with the tendency of trusting others, are more at risk of PSU, which can be explained by their preference and search for online connections.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Social anxiety significantly and positively predicted mobile phone addiction.
“Annoni et al. [36] conducted a questionnaire survey among 240 adults and reported that social anxiety significantly and positively predicted mobile phone addiction.”
From COVID-19 Victimization Experience and College Students’ Mobile Phone Addiction: A Moderated Mediation Effect of Future Anxiety and Mindfulness (2022) · cites this paper as [36]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 111 · Cited by 75
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- [2]Oliveira L. Sedated by the Screen: Social Use of Time in the Age of Mediated Acceleration Available online: www.igi-global.com/chapter/sedated-by-the-screen/223051 (accessed on 5 January 2021)
- [46]Camerini A.L. Marciano L. The Longitudinal Relationship between Smartphone Use, Smartphone Addiction and Depression in Adolescents: An Application of the RI-CLPM Proceedings of the 69th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA) Washington, DC, USA 24–28 May 2019
- [68]Dwyer C. Hiltz S.R. Passerini K. Trust and Privacy Concern within Social Networking Sites. A Comparison of Facebook and MySpace Proceedings of the 13th Americas Conference on Information Systems, AMCIS 2007 Keystone, CO, USA 9–12 August 2007
- [100]Tabachnick B. Fidell L. Using Multivariate Statistics 6th ed. Pearson Education, Inc. New York, NY, USA 2013
- [109]Marciano L. Camerini A.L. Predicting Problematic Smartphone Use from Digital Trace Data and Time Distortion in Adolescents Proceedings of the 70th Annual Conference of the International Communication Association (ICA) Gold Coast, Australia 21–25 May 2020
- Authors
- Annoni, A. M., Petrocchi, S., Camerini, A.-L., & Marciano, L.
- Affiliations
- University of Applied Sciences and Arts of Southern Switzerland (CH)
- Università della Svizzera italiana (CH)
- Corresponding author
- Annoni, Anna Maria
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2021-03-02
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 2452
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7967585
- OpenAlex
- W3134583589
- Cited by
- 75
- References
- 111
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 8
- FWCI
- 18.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- reroDoc Digital Library (submittedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (10DL1C_183199)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
- Social Sciences › Education › Child Development and Digital Technology
- Keywords
- smartphone addiction, social anxiety, dispositional trust, smartphone use duration, moderated mediation, online relationships
- MeSH terms
- Smartphone, Adult, Anxiety, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Behavior, Addictive, Trust, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review