Predicting Exposure to Perfluorinated Alkyl Substances (PFAS) among US Infants
Open accessAbstract
PFASs have been detected in nearly every serum sample collected over the last two decades from US adults as part of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and are commonly found in other data sets from around the world. However, less is known about infant PFAS exposures, primarily because the collection of infant serum samples is less common and frequently avoided. Cord blood samples are often preferred for chemical exposure assessments because this is thought to provide a good representation of infant serum concentrations, at least at the time of birth. In this paper, we will provide a statistical and probabilistic analysis of what can be expected for infants living in the US using NHANES from 2007 to 2008, which contains a rare subset of infant data. Regulatory efforts that require estimation of exposures among the very youth can be challenging, both because of a lack of data in general and because variability among this most vulnerable population can be uncertain. We report that US infant exposures are extremely common and that serum concentrations remain fairly constant, despite infant growth rates and relatively high caloric and fluid intake, with the possible exception of PFOS. Infant serum PFOS concentrations between months 1 and 3 are consistently higher than at less than one month, even though healthy infants at 1 and 2 months weigh more than they did at birth. This suggests that the babies are exposed to greater concentrations of PFOS after birth or that excretion kinetics differ for this PFAS.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Neonatal dried blood spot studies confirm PFASs presence immediately after birth, indicating effective placental transfer.
“Indeed, neonatal dried blood spot (DBS) studies confirm PFASs presence immediately after birth, indicating effective placental transfer [48,49]”
From Exposure to Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs) in Healthcare: Environmental and Clinical Insights (2025) · cites this paper as [49]
The Discussion (section 4; page unavailable) reports PFAS in cord blood and placenta and says this indicates exposure before birth. It does not describe neonatal dried blood spot studies, so the specific evidence attributed to this source is unsupported. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 48 · Cited by 19
- Authors
- Kirk, A. B., Plasse, K. M., Kirk, K. C., Martin, C. F., & Ozsoy, G.
- Affiliations
- George Washington University (US)
- Miami University (US)
- The University of Texas at Austin (US)
- Texas Tech University (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kirk, Andrea B.
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-07-09
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 14
- Pages
- 8402
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9318798
- OpenAlex
- W4285012516
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- ThinkTech (Texas Tech University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Funders
- Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals
- Keywords
- perfluorinated compounds, PFAS exposure, infants, serum concentration, PFOS, umbilical cord blood, NHANES, exposure prediction, infant growth, excretion kinetics
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Environmental Pollutants, Female, Fluorocarbons, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Nutrition Surveys, Pregnancy, Alkanesulfonic Acids, Uncertainty, Parturition
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review