Diet and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE): From Supplementation to Intervention
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic autoimmune inflammatory disease characterised by immune dysregulation affecting multiple organs. Current anti-inflammatory treatments used in SLE are associated with unwanted side-effects. Dietary supplementation has been suggested as a safe and effective addition to conventional treatment, but evidence of efficacy in SLE or preventing associated comorbidities is uncertain. METHODS: We identified literature on clinical trials focused on nutritional interventions in SLE aiming to improve inflammation and comorbidities. A systematic-type search on Embase, Medline, and the Cochrane Library, was conducted to identify nutritional interventions among SLE patients in the past 15 years that met our inclusion criteria. RESULTS: We identified 2754 articles, of which 14 were eligible for inclusion based on our set criteria and were subsequently quality assessed. Vitamin D or E supplementation was associated with respective improvement of inflammatory markers or antibody production, but not disease activity scores in most studies. Despite their expected synergistic actions, the addition of curcumin on vitamin D supplementation had no additional effects on disease activity or inflammatory markers. Trials of omega-3 fatty acid supplementation presented significant reductions in ESR, CRP, disease activity, inflammatory markers, and oxidative stress, and improved lipid levels and endothelial function, while a low glycaemic index (GI) diet showed evidence of reduced weight and improved fatigue in patients. CONCLUSIONS: Different dietary guidelines can therefore be implicated to target specific SLE symptoms or therapeutic side-effects. This systematic review highlights the scarcity of larger and longer in duration trials with homogenous methodologies and verifiable outcomes to assess disease progression.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Nutrition interventional trials are limited by poor participant compliance, use of different dietary assessment tools, limited data on efficacy of nutritional interventions, inadequate information reported by randomized controlled trials, small study groups with low statistical power, and relatively short duration of follow-up.
“Furthermore, nutrition interventional trials are limited by several factors, including poor participant compliance, use of different dietary assessment tools (for instance, 24 h dietary recalls, FFQs, food diaries), limited data on the efficacy of nutritional interventions, inadequate information reported by RCTs, small-size study groups with low statistical power, and relatively short duration of”
From Impact of Mediterranean Diet Adherence During Pregnancy on Preeclampsia, Gestational Diabetes Mellitus, and Excessive Gestational Weight Gain: A Systematic Review of Observational Studies and Randomized Controlled Trials (2025) · cites this paper as [94]
Section 4.7 (Limitations; page unavailable) reports limited efficacy data for nutritional interventions in SLE, inadequate reporting in some studies, and small groups with short follow-up. It does not identify poor participant compliance or the use of different dietary assessment tools such as recalls, FFQs, and food diaries as limitations. It also does not explicitly describe the small studies as having low statistical power. (LLM, conf=0.88)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 62 · Cited by 44
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [49]Rezaieyazdi Z. Sahebari M. Saadati N. Khodashahi M. Vitamin E and Autoimmune Diseases: A Narrative Review Rev. Clin. Med. 2018 5 42 48
- Authors
- Jiao, H., Acar, G., Robinson, G. A., Ciurtin, C., Jury, E. C., & Kalea, A. Z.
- Affiliations
- University College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Kalea, Anastasia Z.
- Venue
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-09-20
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 19
- Pages
- 11895
- ISSN
- 1660-4601 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9565311
- OpenAlex
- W4296741136
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 62
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 1.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- UCL Division of Medicine
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Natural Compounds in Disease Treatment
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Keywords
- systemic lupus erythematosus, dietary supplementation, dietary intervention, vitamin D supplementation, vitamin E supplementation, curcumin, omega-3 fatty acids, low glycemic index diet, disease activity, inflammatory markers, oxidative stress, fatigue, comorbidities, endothelial function, serum lipids
- MeSH terms
- Curcumin, Diet, Humans, Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic, Vitamin D, Biomarkers, Fatty Acids, Omega-3, Dietary Supplements
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review