The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Ceria Nanoparticles on Different Cell Lines in Vitro
Open accessAbstract
Owing to their radical scavenging and UV-filtering properties, ceria nanoparticles (CeO2-NPs) are currently used for various applications, including as catalysts in diesel particulate filters. Because of their ability to filter UV light, CeO2-NPs have garnered significant interest in the medical field and, consequently, are poised for use in various applications. The aim of this work was to investigate the effects of short-term (24 h) and long-term (10 days) CeO2-NP exposure to A549, CaCo2 and HepG2 cell lines. Cytotoxicity assays tested CeO2-NPs over a concentration range of 0.5 μg/mL to 5000 μg/mL, whereas genotoxicity assays tested CeO2-NPs over a concentration range of 0.5 μg/mL to 5000 μg/mL. In vitro assays showed almost no short-term exposure toxicity on any of the tested cell lines. Conversely, long-term CeO2-NP exposure proved toxic for all tested cell lines. NP genotoxicity was detectable even at 24-h exposure. HepG2 was the most sensitive cell line overall; however, the A549 line was most sensitive to the lowest concentration tested. Moreover, the results confirmed the ceria nanoparticles’ capacity to protect cells when they are exposed to well-known oxidants such as H2O2. A Comet assay was performed in the presence of both H2O2 and CeO2-NPs. When hydrogen peroxide was maintained at 25 μM, NPs at 0.5 μg/mL, 50 μg/mL, and 500 μg/mL protected the cells from oxidative damage. Thus, the NPs prevented H2O2-induced genotoxic damage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Cerium Oxide Nanoparticles: Applications and Prospects in Nanomedicine
Das, S., Dowding, J. M., Klump, K. E., McGinnis, J. F., Self, W., & Seal, S. (2013) · Nanomedicine · doi:10.2217/nnm.13.133 · Cited by 561
Platinum nanoparticles in nanobiomedicine
Pedone, D., Moglianetti, M., De Luca, E., Bardi, G., & Pompa, P. P. (2017) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c7cs00152e · Cited by 454
Synthesis and biomedical applications of Cerium oxide nanoparticles – A Review
Rajeshkumar, S., & Naik, P. (2018) · Biotechnology Reports · doi:10.1016/j.btre.2017.11.008 · Cited by 401
Antibacterial mechanism and activity of cerium oxide nanoparticles
Zhang, M., Zhang, C., Zhai, X., Luo, F., Du, Y., & Yan, C. (2019) · Science China Materials · doi:10.1007/s40843-019-9471-7 · Cited by 286
Kumari, M., Kumari, S. I., & Grover, P. (2014) · Mutagenesis · doi:10.1093/mutage/geu038 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- De Marzi, L., Monaco, A., De Lapuente, J., Ramos, D., Borras, M., Di Gioacchino, M., Santucci, S., & Poma, A.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2013-02-01
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 3065-3077
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2084830189
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Ceria Nanoparticles on Different Cell Lines in Vitro. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ijms14023065
- The paper
- De Marzi, L., Monaco, A., De Lapuente, J., Ramos, D., Borras, M., Di Gioacchino, M., Santucci, S., & Poma, A. (2013). Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity of Ceria Nanoparticles on Different Cell Lines in Vitro. International Journal of Molecular Sciences. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms14023065
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.