Cited by 105Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics researchFungal Infections and Studies

Divergent Approaches to Virulence in C. albicans and C. glabrata: Two Sides of the Same Coin

Open access
Galocha, Mónica, Pais, Pedro, Cavalheiro, Mafalda, Pereira, Diana, Viana, Romeu, Teixeira, Miguel C.·2019·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

Candida albicans and Candida glabrata are the two most prevalent etiologic agents of candidiasis worldwide. Although both are recognized as pathogenic, their choice of virulence traits is highly divergent. Indeed, it appears that these different approaches to fungal virulence may be equally successful in causing human candidiasis. In this review, the virulence mechanisms employed by C. albicans and C. glabrata are analyzed, with emphasis on the differences between the two systems. Pathogenesis features considered in this paper include dimorphic growth, secreted enzymes and signaling molecules, and stress resistance mechanisms. The consequences of these traits in tissue invasion, biofilm formation, immune system evasion, and macrophage escape, in a species dependent manner, are discussed. This review highlights the observation that C. albicans and C. glabrata follow different paths leading to a similar outcome. It also highlights the lack of knowledge on some of the specific mechanisms underlying C. glabrata pathogenesis, which deserve future scrutiny.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms20092345

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 227 · Cited by 105

Authors
Galocha, M., Pais, P., Cavalheiro, M., Pereira, D., Viana, R., & Teixeira, M. C.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Teixeira, Miguel C.
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-05-11
Volume
20
Issue
9
Pages
2345
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2943851122
Cited by
105
References
227
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.82
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/BBB-BIO/4004/2014, PTDC/BII-BIO/28216/2017, UID/BIO/04565/2013)
  • Programa Operacional de Lisboa 2020 (007317)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
Keywords
Candida albicans, Candida glabrata, fungal virulence, candidiasis, secreted enzymes, stress tolerance, biofilm formation, tissue invasion, immune evasion, macrophage escape, pathogenesis
MeSH terms
Animals, Candida albicans, Humans, Virulence, Biofilms, Candida glabrata, Host-Pathogen Interactions, Immune Evasion

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review