Cited by 251Ionic liquids properties and applicationsEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyEnvironmental Chemistry and Analysis

Ionic Liquids—A Review of Their Toxicity to Living Organisms

Open access
Gonçalves, Ana R.P., Paredes, Xavier, Cristino, A. F., Santos, F. J.V., Queirós, Carla S.G.P.·2021·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

Ionic liquids (ILs) were initially hailed as a green alternative to traditional solvents because of their almost non-existent vapor pressure as ecological replacement of most common volatile solvents in industrial processes for their damaging effects on the environment. It is common knowledge that they are not as green as desired, and more thought must be put into the biological consequences of their industrial use. Still, compared to the amount of research studying their physicochemical properties and potential applications in different areas, there is a scarcity of scientific papers regarding how these substances interact with different organisms. The intent of this review was to compile the information published in this area since 2015 to allow the reader to better understand how, for example, bacteria, plants, fish, etc., react to the presence of this family of liquids. In general, lipophilicity is one of the main drivers of toxicity and thus the type of cation. The anion tends to play a minor (but not negligible) role, but more research is needed since, owing to the very nature of ILs, except for the most common ones (imidazolium and ammonium-based), many of them are subject to only one or two articles.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms22115612

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 174 · Cited by 251

Authors
Gonçalves, A. R. P., Paredes, X., Cristino, A. F., Santos, F. J. V., & Queirós, C. S. G. P.
Affiliations
University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
Queirós, Carla S.G.P.
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-25
Volume
22
Issue
11
Pages
5612
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165802656
Cited by
251
References
174
Citations by year
2026: 55 · 2025: 59 · 2024: 51 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 7
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Centro de Química Estrutural
  • Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (01-0145, LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Catalysis › Ionic liquids properties and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Environmental Chemistry and Analysis
Keywords
ionic liquids, toxicity, biological effects, lipophilicity, cation effects, anion effects, imidazolium ionic liquids, ammonium ionic liquids, green solvents, bacteria, plants, fish, ecotoxicity
MeSH terms
Animals, Humans, Plants, Ionic Liquids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review