Cited by 23Bone Tissue Engineering MaterialsSilk-based biomaterials and applicationsElectrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

Enhanced BMP-2-Mediated Bone Repair Using an Anisotropic Silk Fibroin Scaffold Coated with Bone-like Apatite

Open access
Deininger, Christian, Wagner, Andrea, Heimel, Patrick, Salzer, Elias, Vila, Xavier Monforte, Weißenbacher, Nadja, Grillari, Johannes, Redl, Heinz +5 more·2021·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

The repair of large bone defects remains challenging and often requires graft material due to limited availability of autologous bone. In clinical settings, collagen sponges loaded with excessive amounts of bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) are occasionally used for the treatment of bone non-unions, increasing the risk of adverse events. Therefore, strategies to reduce rhBMP-2 dosage are desirable. Silk scaffolds show great promise due to their favorable biocompatibility and their utility for various biofabrication methods. For this study, we generated silk scaffolds with axially aligned pores, which were subsequently treated with 10× simulated body fluid (SBF) to generate an apatitic calcium phosphate coating. Using a rat femoral critical sized defect model (CSD) we evaluated if the resulting scaffold allows the reduction of BMP-2 dosage to promote efficient bone repair by providing appropriate guidance cues. Highly porous, anisotropic silk scaffolds were produced, demonstrating good cytocompatibility in vitro and treatment with 10× SBF resulted in efficient surface coating. In vivo, the coated silk scaffolds loaded with a low dose of rhBMP-2 demonstrated significantly improved bone regeneration when compared to the unmineralized scaffold. Overall, our findings show that this simple and cost-efficient technique yields scaffolds that enhance rhBMP-2 mediated bone healing.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms23010283

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Natural polymer carriers may be advantageous if they contain cell binding motifs that promote osteoconductivity.

    “Natural polymer carriers may be advantageous if they contain cell binding motifs that promote osteoconductivity. [9–12]”

    From Keratin Scaffold Formulation Impacts rhBMP-2 Biodistribution and Bone Regeneration in a Rat Femur Defect Model (2025) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) describes silk fibroin as a natural polymer used for bone scaffolds and says bone-like apatite coatings can make those scaffolds osteoconductive. It does not say that cell-binding motifs confer this advantage or promote osteoconductivity; indeed, it describes untreated silk fibroin scaffolds as generally poorly osteoconductive. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 23

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [47]Romeis B. Mikroskopische Technik 18th ed. Mulisch M. Welsch U. Springer Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany 2010 551

Authors
Deininger, C., Wagner, A., Heimel, P., Salzer, E., Vila, X. M., Weißenbacher, N., Grillari, J., Redl, H., Wichlas, F., Freude, T., Tempfer, H., Teuschl-Woller, A. H., & Traweger, A.
Affiliations
  • Paracelsus Medical University (AT)
  • Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration (AT)
  • Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation with AUVA (AT)
  • University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien (AT)
  • Institute of Molecular Biotechnology (AT)
  • Austrian Cluster for Tissue Regeneration, 1200 Vienna, Austria
Corresponding author
Traweger, Andreas
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-12-28
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
283
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4200319756
Cited by
23
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Lorenz Böhler Gesellschaft (04/16)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
Keywords
silk fibroin scaffolds, BMP-2, apatite coating, calcium phosphate coatings, anisotropic scaffolds, critical-size bone defect, bone regeneration, simulated body fluid, bone graft substitutes
MeSH terms
Adenosine Triphosphate, Animals, Apatites, Bone and Bones, Bone Regeneration, Femur, Fibroins, Freezing, Humans, Male, Recombinant Proteins, Transforming Growth Factor beta, Anisotropy, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Caspases, Biomimetic Materials, Rats, Caspase 7, Tissue Scaffolds, X-Ray Microtomography, Bone Morphogenetic Protein 2

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review