The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
Computer-Aided Diagnosis by Tissue Image Analysis as an Optical Biopsy in Hysteroscopy
Open accessAbstract
This review of our experience in computer-assisted tissue image analysis (CATIA) research shows that significant information can be extracted and used to diagnose and distinguish normal from abnormal endometrium. CATIA enabled the evaluation and differentiation between the benign and malignant endometrium during diagnostic hysteroscopy. The efficacy of texture analysis in the endometrium image during hysteroscopy was examined in 40 women, where 209 normal and 209 abnormal regions of interest (ROIs) were extracted. There was a significant difference between normal and abnormal endometrium for the statistical features (SF) features mean, variance, median, energy and entropy; for the spatial grey-level difference matrix (SGLDM) features contrast, correlation, variance, homogeneity and entropy; and for the gray-level difference statistics (GLDS) features homogeneity, contrast, energy, entropy and mean. We further evaluated 52 hysteroscopic images of 258 normal and 258 abnormal endometrium ROIs, and tissue diagnosis was verified by histopathology after biopsy. The YCrCb color system with SF, SGLDM and GLDS color texture features based on support vector machine (SVM) modeling correctly classified 81% of the cases with a sensitivity and a specificity of 78% and 81%, respectively, for normal and hyperplastic endometrium. New technical and computational advances may improve optical biopsy accuracy and assist in the precision of lesion excision during hysteroscopy. The exchange of knowledge, collaboration, identification of tasks and CATIA method selection strategy will further improve computer-aided diagnosis implementation in the daily practice of hysteroscopy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Novel techniques such as the ElectroUteroGraph (EUG) and computer-assisted tissue imaging analysis (CATIA) show promising results in monitoring uterine contractility and pathologies affecting tissue histology.
“Novel techniques such as the ElectroUteroGraph (EUG) and computer-assisted tissue imaging analysis (CATIA) show promising results in monitoring the uterine contractility and pathologies affecting tissue histology.”
From Malignancy in Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Is There a Way to Avoid It? A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [53]
The Results (§2.2–2.3; page unavailable) report that CATIA distinguished normal from abnormal endometrial tissue and classified normal versus hyperplastic endometrium. The paper does not address the ElectroUteroGraph or monitoring uterine contractility, so it supports only the CATIA portion of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.87)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 10
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Karkanis, S., Galousi, K., and Maroulis, D. (1999). Classification of endoscopic images based on texture spectrum. Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Applications.
Metadata
- Authors
- Tanos, V., Neofytou, M., Tanos, P., Pattichis, C. S., & Pattichis, M. S.
- Affiliations
- University of Nicosia (CY)
- University of Cyprus (CY)
- Causeway Hospital, Coleraine BT51 3AE, UK
- University of New Mexico (US)
- Corresponding author
- Tanos, Vasilios
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-10-24
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 21
- Pages
- 12782
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9656747
- OpenAlex
- W4307267296
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
- FWCI
- 0.58
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
- Keywords
- computer-aided diagnosis, tissue image analysis, optical biopsy, hysteroscopy, endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer, texture analysis, support vector machine
- MeSH terms
- Biopsy, Computers, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Sensitivity and Specificity, Hysteroscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review