Cited by 10AI in cancer detectionImage Retrieval and Classification TechniquesRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

Computer-Aided Diagnosis by Tissue Image Analysis as an Optical Biopsy in Hysteroscopy

Open access
Tanos, Vasilios, Neofytou, Marios, Tanos, Panayiotis, Pattichis, Constantinos S., Pattichis, Marios S.·2022·International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Abstract

This review of our experience in computer-assisted tissue image analysis (CATIA) research shows that significant information can be extracted and used to diagnose and distinguish normal from abnormal endometrium. CATIA enabled the evaluation and differentiation between the benign and malignant endometrium during diagnostic hysteroscopy. The efficacy of texture analysis in the endometrium image during hysteroscopy was examined in 40 women, where 209 normal and 209 abnormal regions of interest (ROIs) were extracted. There was a significant difference between normal and abnormal endometrium for the statistical features (SF) features mean, variance, median, energy and entropy; for the spatial grey-level difference matrix (SGLDM) features contrast, correlation, variance, homogeneity and entropy; and for the gray-level difference statistics (GLDS) features homogeneity, contrast, energy, entropy and mean. We further evaluated 52 hysteroscopic images of 258 normal and 258 abnormal endometrium ROIs, and tissue diagnosis was verified by histopathology after biopsy. The YCrCb color system with SF, SGLDM and GLDS color texture features based on support vector machine (SVM) modeling correctly classified 81% of the cases with a sensitivity and a specificity of 78% and 81%, respectively, for normal and hyperplastic endometrium. New technical and computational advances may improve optical biopsy accuracy and assist in the precision of lesion excision during hysteroscopy. The exchange of knowledge, collaboration, identification of tasks and CATIA method selection strategy will further improve computer-aided diagnosis implementation in the daily practice of hysteroscopy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijms232112782

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Novel techniques such as the ElectroUteroGraph (EUG) and computer-assisted tissue imaging analysis (CATIA) show promising results in monitoring uterine contractility and pathologies affecting tissue histology.

    “Novel techniques such as the ElectroUteroGraph (EUG) and computer-assisted tissue imaging analysis (CATIA) show promising results in monitoring the uterine contractility and pathologies affecting tissue histology.”

    From Malignancy in Abdominal Wall Endometriosis: Is There a Way to Avoid It? A Systematic Review (2024) · cites this paper as [53]

    The Results (§2.2–2.3; page unavailable) report that CATIA distinguished normal from abnormal endometrial tissue and classified normal versus hyperplastic endometrium. The paper does not address the ElectroUteroGraph or monitoring uterine contractility, so it supports only the CATIA portion of the sentence. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 10

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Karkanis, S., Galousi, K., and Maroulis, D. (1999). Classification of endoscopic images based on texture spectrum. Workshop on Machine Learning in Medical Applications.

Metadata

Authors
Tanos, V., Neofytou, M., Tanos, P., Pattichis, C. S., & Pattichis, M. S.
Affiliations
  • University of Nicosia (CY)
  • University of Cyprus (CY)
  • Causeway Hospital, Coleraine BT51 3AE, UK
  • University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Tanos, Vasilios
Venue
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2022-10-24
Volume
23
Issue
21
Pages
12782
ISSN
1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4307267296
Cited by
10
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Image Retrieval and Classification Techniques
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Keywords
computer-aided diagnosis, tissue image analysis, optical biopsy, hysteroscopy, endometrium, endometrial hyperplasia, endometrial cancer, texture analysis, support vector machine
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Computers, Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted, Endometrium, Female, Humans, Pregnancy, Sensitivity and Specificity, Hysteroscopy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review