Antimicrobial and Cytotoxic Activities of Water-Soluble Isoxazole-Linked 1,3,4-Oxadiazole with Delocalized Charge: In Vitro and In Vivo Results
Open accessAbstract
The distinct structure of cationic organic compounds plays a pivotal role in enhancing their water solubility, which in turn influences their bioavailability. A representative of these compounds, which contains a delocalized charge, is 5-amino-2-(5-amino-3-methyl-1,2-oxazol-4-yl)-3-methyl-2,3-dihydro-1,3,4-oxadiazol-2-ylium bromide (ED). The high-water solubility of ED obviates the need for potentially harmful solvents during in vitro testing. The antibacterial and antifungal activities of the ED compound were assessed in vitro using the microtiter plate method and a biocellulose-based biofilm model. Additionally, its cytotoxic effects on wound bed fibroblasts and keratinocytes were examined. The antistaphylococcal activity of ED was also evaluated using an in vivo larvae model of Galleria mellonella. Results indicated that ED was more effective against Gram-positive bacteria than Gram-negative ones, exhibiting bactericidal properties. Furthermore, ED demonstrated greater efficacy against biofilms formed by Gram-positive bacteria. At bactericidal concentrations, ED was non-cytotoxic to fibroblasts and keratinocytes. In in vivo tests, ED was non-toxic to the larvae. When co-injected with a high load of S. aureus, it reduced the average larval mortality by approximately 40%. These findings suggest that ED holds promise for further evaluation as a potential treatment for biofilm-based wound infections, especially those caused by Gram-positive pathogens like S. aureus.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 35 · Cited by 10
- Authors
- Dudek, B., Bąchor, U., Drozd-Szczygieł, E., Brożyna, M., Dąbrowski, P., Junka, A., & Mączyński, M.
- Affiliations
- Wroclaw Medical University (PL)
- Uczelnia Łazarskiego (PL)
- Department of Organic Chemistry and Drug Technology, Faculty of Pharmacy, Wroclaw Medical University, 211A Borowska Street, 50-556 Wroclaw, Poland
- Corresponding author
- Junka, Adam
- ORCID
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-11-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 16033
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10671643
- OpenAlex
- W4388445614
- Cited by
- 10
- References
- 35
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 1.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Wroclaw Medical University (SUBK.D090.23.007, SUBZ.D090.23.027, SUBZ.D230.23.030.)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Structural and Chemical Analysis of Organic and Inorganic Compounds
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Antimicrobial Peptides and Activities
- Keywords
- 1,3,4-oxadiazoles, isoxazoles, water solubility, antibacterial activity, antifungal activity, biofilm, Staphylococcus aureus, Staphylococcus epidermidis, Galleria mellonella larvae, cytotoxicity, fibroblasts, keratinocytes, wound infection, Gram-positive bacteria
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Anti-Infective Agents, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Gram-Positive Bacteria, Larva, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Oxadiazoles, Staphylococcus aureus, Water, Biofilms
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review