Assessing Protein Surface-Based Scoring for Interpreting Genomic Variants
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Clinical genomics sequencing is rapidly expanding the number of variants that need to be functionally elucidated. Interpreting genetic variants (i.e., mutations) usually begins by identifying how they affect protein-coding sequences. Still, the three-dimensional (3D) protein molecule is rarely considered for large-scale variant analysis, nor in analyses of how proteins interact with each other and their environment. We propose a standardized approach to scoring protein surface property changes as a new dimension for functionally and mechanistically interpreting genomic variants. Further, it directs hypothesis generation for functional genomics research to learn more about the encoded protein’s function. We developed a novel method leveraging 3D structures and time-dependent simulations to score and statistically evaluate protein surface property changes. We evaluated positive controls composed of eight thermophilic versus mesophilic orthologs and variants that experimentally change the protein’s solubility, which all showed large and statistically significant differences in charge distribution (p < 0.01). We scored static 3D structures and dynamic ensembles for 43 independent variants (23 pathogenic and 20 uninterpreted) across four proteins. Focusing on the potassium ion channel, KCNK9, the average local surface potential shifts were 0.41 kBT/ec with an average p-value of 1 × 10−2. In contrast, dynamic ensemble shifts averaged 1.15 kBT/ec with an average p-value of 1 × 10−5, enabling the identification of changes far from mutated sites. This study demonstrates that an objective assessment of how mutations affect electrostatic distributions of protein surfaces can aid in interpreting genomic variants discovered through clinical genomic sequencing.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594 · see citing works
The Human Gene Mutation Database: 2008 update
Stenson, P. D., Mort, M., Ball, E. V., Howells, K., Phillips, A. D., Thomas, N. S., & Cooper, D. N. (2009) · Genome Medicine · doi:10.1186/gm13 · Cited by 873 · see citing works
VIPdb, a genetic variant impact predictor database
Hu, Z., Yu, C., Furutsuki, M., Andreoletti, G., Ly, M., Hoskins, R., Adhikari, A. N., & Brenner, S. E. (2019) · Human Mutation · doi:10.1002/humu.23858 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Dsouza, N. R., Haque, N., Tripathi, S., & Zimmermann, M. T.
- Affiliations
- Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
- St. Jude Children's Research Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zimmermann, Michael T.
- Venue
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-11-08
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 22
- Pages
- 12018
- ISSN
- 1422-0067 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11594063
- OpenAlex
- W4404189058
- Cited by
- 2
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1
- FWCI
- 0.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- International Journal of Molecular Sciences (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Research Computing Center at the Medical College of Wisconsin
- Linda T. and John A. Mellowes Endowed Innovation and Discovery Fund
- Genomic Sciences and Precision Medicine Center of the Medical College of Wisconsin
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Keywords
- variant interpretation, genetic variants, protein 3D structure, electrostatic potential, charge distribution, protein solubility, KCNK9, potassium channels, protein dynamics, pathogenic variants
- MeSH terms
- Humans, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Surface Properties, Genetic Variation, Genomics
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review