Cited by 36Sexual Differentiation and DisordersAdrenal Hormones and DisordersMetabolism and Genetic Disorders

Newborn screening protocols and positive predictive value for congenital adrenal hyperplasia vary across the United States

Open access
Speiser, Phyllis, Chawla, Reeti, Chen, Ming, Diaz-Thomas, Alicia, Finlayson, Courtney, Rutter, Meilan, Sandberg, David, Shimy, Kim +5 more·2020·International Journal of Neonatal Screening

Abstract

Newborn screening for congenital adrenal hyperplasia (CAH) caused by 21-hydroxylase deficiency is mandated throughout the US. Filter paper blood specimens are assayed for 17-hydroxyprogesterone (17OHP). Prematurity, low birth weight, or critical illness cause falsely elevated results. The purpose of this report is to highlight differences in protocols among US state laboratories. We circulated a survey to state laboratory directors requesting qualitative and quantitative information about individual screening programs. Qualitative and quantitative information provided by 17 state programs were available for analysis. Disease prevalence ranged from 1:9941 to 1:28,661 live births. Four state laboratories mandated a second screen regardless of the initial screening results; most others did so for infants in intensive care units. All but one program utilized birthweight cut-points, but cutoffs varied widely: 17OHP values of 25 to 75 ng/mL for birthweights >2250-2500 g. The positive predictive values for normal birthweight infants varied from 0.7% to 50%, with the highest predictive values based in two of the states with a mandatory second screen. Data were unavailable for negative predictive values. These data imply differences in sensitivity and specificity in CAH screening in the US. Standardization of newborn screening protocols could improve the positive predictive value.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ijns6020037

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 33 · Cited by 36

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [32]Defining, Establishing, and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory; Approved Guidelines-Third Edition CLSI Document (2010), 3rd ed.; CLSI: Wayne, PA, USA, 2010; Volume EP28-A3c.

Authors
Speiser, P., Chawla, R., Chen, M., Diaz-Thomas, A., Finlayson, C., Rutter, M., Sandberg, D., Shimy, K., Talib, R., Cerise, J., Vilain, E., Délot, E., & on behalf of the Disorders/Differences of Sex Development-Translational Research Network (DSD-TRN)
Affiliations
  • Feinstein Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • Phoenix Children's Hospital (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
  • Children's National (US)
  • Northwell Health (US)
Corresponding author
Speiser, Phyllis
Venue
International Journal of Neonatal Screening
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-05-08
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
37
ISSN
2409-515X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3023445327
Cited by
36
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 3
FWCI
1.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Neonatal Screening (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (1R01 HD093450)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Sexual Differentiation and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Metabolism and Genetic Disorders
Keywords
congenital adrenal hyperplasia, 21-hydroxylase deficiency, newborn screening, 17-hydroxyprogesterone, positive predictive value, second screening, disease prevalence, false positives, preterm birth

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review