Cited by 0Physiological and biochemical adaptationsCollembola Taxonomy and Ecology StudiesTardigrade Biology and Ecology

Proteomic Responses of the Springtail Folsomia candida to Drought

Open access
Wang, Yang, Slotsbo, Stine, Bak, Steffen Y., Martyniuk, Christopher J., Holmstrup, Martin·2025·Insects

Abstract

Springtails are adapted to life in the pore space of soil, where humidity in moist soil is close to saturation. Drought is the most important limiting factor for springtails; however, their molecular and physiological adaptations to low humidity are not well understood. The present study explored the global proteomic drought response of the springtail, Folsomia candida (Isotomidae, Collembola). In relatively dry soil (−360 kPa), adult springtails initially lost body water but re-established the normal body water content over the following two weeks. Nano LC–MS/MS analysis identified a total of 1729 unique proteins. Proteomic analysis and pathway enrichment found that the proteome generally did not show a dramatic induction of proteins in response to drought stress. After an initial down-regulation of pathways related to metabolism and growth, these pathways gradually returned to the same levels as in moist soil. Other pathways such as the cytoskeleton pathway, which is important in cell proliferation and differentiation, were predominantly down-regulated throughout the experiment in drought-exposed animals, which correlated with essentially no somatic growth of the springtails in dry soil. This study facilitates the understanding of the consequences of climate change on soil functioning and fertility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/insects16070707

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36

Authors
Wang, Y., Slotsbo, S., Bak, S. Y., Martyniuk, C. J., & Holmstrup, M.
Affiliations
  • Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, C.F. Møllers Allé 4, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., Edwin Rahrs Vej 38, 8220 Brabrand, Denmark
  • University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Holmstrup, Martin
Venue
Insects
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-07-09
Volume
16
Issue
7
Pages
707
ISSN
2075-4450 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412199708
Cited by
0
References
36
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Insects (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
EU Commission under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action—European Training Network (859891)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Tardigrade Biology and Ecology
Keywords
Folsomia candida, Collembola, drought stress, proteomic response, soil moisture, physical growth, soil fauna, climate change impacts on soil

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review