Proteomic Responses of the Springtail Folsomia candida to Drought
Open accessAbstract
Springtails are adapted to life in the pore space of soil, where humidity in moist soil is close to saturation. Drought is the most important limiting factor for springtails; however, their molecular and physiological adaptations to low humidity are not well understood. The present study explored the global proteomic drought response of the springtail, Folsomia candida (Isotomidae, Collembola). In relatively dry soil (−360 kPa), adult springtails initially lost body water but re-established the normal body water content over the following two weeks. Nano LC–MS/MS analysis identified a total of 1729 unique proteins. Proteomic analysis and pathway enrichment found that the proteome generally did not show a dramatic induction of proteins in response to drought stress. After an initial down-regulation of pathways related to metabolism and growth, these pathways gradually returned to the same levels as in moist soil. Other pathways such as the cytoskeleton pathway, which is important in cell proliferation and differentiation, were predominantly down-regulated throughout the experiment in drought-exposed animals, which correlated with essentially no somatic growth of the springtails in dry soil. This study facilitates the understanding of the consequences of climate change on soil functioning and fertility.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 36
- Authors
- Wang, Y., Slotsbo, S., Bak, S. Y., Martyniuk, C. J., & Holmstrup, M.
- Affiliations
- Department of Ecoscience, Aarhus University, C.F. Møllers Allé 4, 8000 Aarhus, Denmark
- Aarhus University (DK)
- International Flavors & Fragrances Inc., Edwin Rahrs Vej 38, 8220 Brabrand, Denmark
- University of Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Holmstrup, Martin
- Venue
- Insects
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-07-09
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 707
- ISSN
- 2075-4450 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12295829
- OpenAlex
- W4412199708
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Insects (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Scopus (Elsevier) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- EU Commission under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie Action—European Training Network (859891)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Physiological and biochemical adaptations
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Collembola Taxonomy and Ecology Studies
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Tardigrade Biology and Ecology
- Keywords
- Folsomia candida, Collembola, drought stress, proteomic response, soil moisture, physical growth, soil fauna, climate change impacts on soil
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review