The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Action on the Surface: Entomopathogenic Fungi versus the Insect Cuticle
Open accessAbstract
Infections mediated by broad host range entomopathogenic fungi represent seminal observations that led to one of the first germ theories of disease and are a classic example of a co-evolutionary arms race between a pathogen and target hosts. These fungi are able to parasitize susceptible hosts via direct penetration of the cuticle with the initial and potentially determining interaction occurring between the fungal spore and the insect epicuticle. Entomogenous fungi have evolved mechanisms for adhesion and recognition of host surface cues that help direct an adaptive response that includes the production of: (a) hydrolytic, assimilatory, and/or detoxifying enzymes including lipase/esterases, catalases, cytochrome P450s, proteases, and chitinases; (b) specialized infectious structures, e.g., appressoria or penetrant tubes; and (c) secondary and other metabolites that facilitate infection. Aside from immune responses, insects have evolved a number of mechanisms to keep pathogens at bay that include: (a) the production of (epi) cuticular antimicrobial lipids, proteins, and metabolites; (b) shedding of the cuticle during development; and (c) behavioral-environmental adaptations such as induced fever, burrowing, and grooming, as well as potentially enlisting the help of other microbes, all intended to stop the pathogen before it can breach the cuticle. Virulence and host-defense can be considered to be under constant reciprocal selective pressure, and the action on the surface likely contributes to phenomena such as strain variation, host range, and the increased virulence often noted once a (low) virulent strain is “passaged” through an insect host. Since the cuticle represents the first point of contact and barrier between the fungus and the insect, the “action on the surface” may represent the defining interactions that ultimately can lead either to successful mycosis by the pathogen or successful defense by the host. Knowledge concerning the molecular mechanisms underlying this interaction can shed light on the ecology and evolution of virulence and can be used for rational design strategies at increasing the effectiveness of entomopathogenic fungi for pest control in field applications.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Beys da silva, W. O., Santi, L., Corrêa, A. P. F., Silva, L. A. D., Bresciani, F. R., Schrank, A., & Vainstein, M. H. (2010) · Fungal Biology · doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2010.08.007 · Cited by 37
Cited by
The production and uses of Beauveria bassiana as a microbial insecticide
Mascarin, G. M., & Jaronski, S. T. (2016) · World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s11274-016-2131-3 · Cited by 503
Islam, W., Adnan, M., Shabbir, A., Naveed, H., Abubakar, Y. S., Qasim, M., Tayyab, M., Noman, A., Nisar, M. S., Khan, K. A., et al. (2021) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2021.105122 · Cited by 259
Liu, J., Wu, F., & Chen, C. (2015) · Bioorganic & Medicinal Chemistry Letters · doi:10.1016/j.bmcl.2015.10.004 · Cited by 46
Metadata
- Authors
- Ortiz-Urquiza, A., & Keyhani, N.
- Venue
- Insects
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2013-07-16
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 357-374
- ISSN
- 2075-4450 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114799642
- Cited by
- 783
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 28.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Action on the Surface: Entomopathogenic Fungi versus the Insect Cuticle. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/insects4030357
- The paper
- Ortiz-Urquiza, A., & Keyhani, N. (2013). Action on the Surface: Entomopathogenic Fungi versus the Insect Cuticle. Insects. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects4030357
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.