Cited by 59Sleep and related disordersPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Alliance for Sleep Clinical Practice Guideline on Switching or Deprescribing Hypnotic Medications for Insomnia

Open access
Watson, Nathaniel F., Benca, Ruth M., Krystal, Andrew D., McCall, William V., Neubauer, David N.·2023·Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract

Determining the most effective insomnia medication for patients may require therapeutic trials of different medications. In addition, medication side effects, interactions with co-administered medications, and declining therapeutic efficacy can necessitate switching between different insomnia medications or deprescribing altogether. Currently, little guidance exists regarding the safest and most effective way to transition from one medication to another. Thus, we developed evidence-based guidelines to inform clinicians regarding best practices when deprescribing or transitioning between insomnia medications. Five U.S.-based sleep experts reviewed the literature involving insomnia medication deprescribing, tapering, and switching and rated the quality of evidence. They used this evidence to generate recommendations through discussion and consensus. When switching or discontinuing insomnia medications, we recommend benzodiazepine hypnotic drugs be tapered while additional CBT-I is provided. For Z-drugs zolpidem and eszopiclone (and not zaleplon), especially when prescribed at supratherapeutic doses, tapering is recommended with a 1-2-day delay in administration of the next insomnia therapy when applicable. There is no need to taper DORAs, doxepin, and ramelteon. Lastly, off-label antidepressants and antipsychotics used to treat insomnia should be gradually reduced when discontinuing. In general, offering individuals a rationale for deprescribing or switching and involving them in the decision-making process can facilitate the change and enhance treatment success.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jcm12072493

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A review on the feasibility of BZD/Z-drug deprescribing highlighted the potential benefits of gradual tapering combined with non-pharmacological interventions; however, the overall quality of the supporting evidence was low.

    “a review on the feasibility of BZD/Z-drug deprescribing highlighted the potential benefits of gradual tapering combined with non-pharmacological interventions; however, the overall quality of the supporting evidence was low. 30 73 80”

    From Z-drug abuse and dependence: Clinical guideline of the Brazilian Academy of Neurology for diagnosis and management (2025) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Literature Review (section 3.1; page unavailable) reports that tapering with psychological support can help deprescribe benzodiazepines and other hypnotics. The Z-Drug Discontinuation section (3.2; page unavailable) says CBT-I may help people transition off hypnotics. The paper does not characterize the overall quality of evidence for BZD/Z-drug deprescribing as low; its discussion of insufficient evidence is more limited. (LLM, conf=0.85)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 112 · Cited by 59

Authors
Watson, N. F., Benca, R. M., Krystal, A. D., McCall, W. V., & Neubauer, D. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Augusta University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
Corresponding author
Watson, Nathaniel F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-03-25
Volume
12
Issue
7
Pages
2493
ISSN
2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4361007887
Cited by
59
References
112
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Idorsia Pharmaceuticals US Inc. (Idorsia)
  • LAS Communications, Inc.
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
insomnia, drug switching, benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, zolpidem, eszopiclone, zaleplon, DORA, doxepin, ramelteon, tapering, cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia, shared decision-making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review