Virtual Reality Exercise for Anxiety and Depression: A Preliminary Review of Current Research in an Emerging Field
Open accessAbstract
Objective: Although current evidence supports the use of virtual reality (VR) in the treatment of mental disorders, it is unknown whether VR exercise would be beneficial to mental health. This review synthesized literature concerning the effect of VR exercise on anxiety and depression among various populations. Methods: Ten electronic databases were searched for studies on this topic from January 2000 through October 2017. Studies were eligible if the article: (1) was peer-reviewed; (2) was published in English; and (3) used quantitative measures in assessing anxiety- and depression-related outcomes. Results: A total of five empirical studies met the eligibility criteria. These studies included two randomized clinical trials, one control trial, and two cross-sectional studies. Four studies reported significant improvements in anxiety- and depression-related measures following VR exercise, including reduced tiredness and tension, in addition to increased energy and enjoyment. Nonetheless, one study failed to support the effectiveness of VR exercise over traditional exercise alone on depressive symptoms. Conclusions: Findings favor VR exercise in alleviating anxiety and depression symptomology. However, existing evidence is insufficient to support the advantages of VR exercise as a standalone treatment over traditional therapy in the alleviation of anxiety and depression given the paucity of studies, small sample sizes, and lack of high-quality research designs. Future studies may build upon these limitations to discern the optimal manner by which to employ VR exercise in clinical settings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The limited number of studies in Zeng et al [24] can be primarily attributed to the authors' focus on exercise interventions using VR.
“Regarding the second review, the limited number of studies included can be primarily attributed to the authors’ focus on exercise interventions using VR.”
From Immersive technologies for depression care: scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
The primary facilitator for implementation of IMT interventions for depressive symptoms described in the literature is the availability of evidence supporting the efficacy of the treatment.
“The primary facilitator for the implementation of IMT interventions for depressive symptoms described in the literature is the availability of evidence supporting the efficacy of the treatment [23,24].”
From Immersive technologies for depression care: scoping review (2024) · cites this paper as [24]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 42 · Cited by 224
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [1]Kazdin A.E. Encyclopedia of Psychology Oxford University Press Washington, DC, USA 2000
- [2]Anxiety and Depression Association of America Facts & Statistics 2017 Available online: https://adaa.org/about-adaa/press-room/facts-statistics (accessed on 23 November 2017)
- Authors
- Zeng, N., Pope, Z., Lee, J., & Gao, Z.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- University of Minnesota, Duluth (US)
- Corresponding author
- Gao, Zan
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Medicine
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2018-03-04
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 42
- ISSN
- 2077-0383 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5867568
- OpenAlex
- W2790909468
- Cited by
- 224
- References
- 42
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 3
- FWCI
- 3.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Human-Computer Interaction › Virtual Reality Applications and Impacts
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
- Keywords
- virtual reality exercise, anxiety, depression, depressive symptoms, mental health, exercise therapy, virtual reality therapy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review