The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Critical Review of the Parameters Affecting the Effectiveness of Moisture Absorption Treatments Used for Natural Composites
Open accessAbstract
Natural composites can be fabricated through reinforcing either synthetic or bio-based polymers with hydrophilic natural fibers. Ultimate moisture absorption resistance at the fiber–matrix interface can be achieved when hydrophilic natural fibers are used to reinforce biopolymers due to the high degree of compatibility between them. However, the cost of biopolymers is several times higher than that of their synthetic counterparts, which hinders their dissemination in various industries. In order to produce economically feasible natural composites, synthetic resins are frequently reinforced with hydrophilic fibers, which increases the incompatibility issues such as the creation of voids and delamination at fiber–matrix interfaces. Therefore, applying chemical and/or physical treatments to eliminate the aforementioned drawbacks is of primary importance. However, it is demonstrated through this review study that these treatments do not guarantee a sufficient improvement of the moisture absorption properties of natural composites, and the moisture treatments should be applied under the consideration of the following parameters: (i) type of hosting matrix; (ii) type of natural fiber; (iii) loading of natural fiber; (iv) the hybridization of natural fibers with mineral/synthetic counterparts; (v) implantation of nanofillers. Complete discussion about each of these parameters is developed through this study.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Espert, A., Vilaplana, F., & Karlsson, S. (2004) · Composites Part A: Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.04.004 · Cited by 876
Dayo, A. Q., Gao, B.-C., Wang, J., Liu, W.-B., Derradji, M., Shah, A. H., & Babar, A. A. (2017) · Composites Science and Technology · doi:10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.03.024 · Cited by 158
Cited by
Al-Maharma, A. Y., Patil, S. P., & Markert, B. (2020) · Materials Research Express · doi:10.1088/2053-1591/abcc5d · Cited by 404
Self-citationJagadeesh, P., Puttegowda, M., Mavinkere Rangappa, S., & Siengchin, S. (2021) · Polymer Composites · doi:10.1002/pc.26312 · Cited by 281
Recent Advances in the Analysis of Functional and Structural Polymer Composites for Wind Turbines
Lagos, F., Menacer, B., Salas, A., Narayan, S., Medina, C., Valle, R., Garrido, C., Pincheira, G., Oñate, A., Hunter-Alarcón, R., et al. (2025) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym17172339 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Al-Maharma, A., & Al-Huniti, N.
- Venue
- Journal of Composites Science
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-03-18
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27
- ISSN
- 2504-477X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2921286765
- Cited by
- 173
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.22
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Critical Review of the Parameters Affecting the Effectiveness of Moisture Absorption Treatments Used for Natural Composites. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/jcs3010027
- The paper
- Al-Maharma, A., & Al-Huniti, N. (2019). Critical Review of the Parameters Affecting the Effectiveness of Moisture Absorption Treatments Used for Natural Composites. Journal of Composites Science. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcs3010027
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.