The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Biocompatibility of Bacterial Cellulose Based Biomaterials
Open accessAbstract
Some bacteria can synthesize cellulose when they are cultivated under adequate conditions. These bacteria produce a mat of cellulose on the top of the culture medium, which is formed by a three-dimensional coherent network of pure cellulose nanofibers. Bacterial cellulose (BC) has been widely used in different fields, such as the paper industry, electronics and tissue engineering due to its remarkable mechanical properties, conformability and porosity. Nanocomposites based on BC have received much attention, because of the possibility of combining the good properties of BC with other materials for specific applications. BC nanocomposites can be processed either in a static or an agitated medium. The fabrication of BC nanocomposites in static media can be carried out while keeping the original mat structure obtained after the synthesis to form the final nanocomposite or by altering the culture media with other components. The present article reviews the issue of biocompatibility of BC and BC nanocomposites. Biomedical aspects, such as surface modification for improving cell adhesion, in vitro and in vivo studies are given along with details concerning the physics of network formation and the changes that occur in the cellulose networks due to the presence of a second phase. The relevance of biocompatibility studies for the development of BC-based materials in bone, skin and cardiovascular tissue engineering is also discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Kombucha Fermentation and Its Antimicrobial Activity
Sreeramulu, G., Zhu, Y., & Knol, W. (2000) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/jf991333m · Cited by 317
Cited by
Biopolymer-based functional composites for medical applications
Park, S.-B., Lih, E., Park, K.-S., Joung, Y. K., & Han, D. K. (2017) · Progress in Polymer Science · doi:10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2016.12.003 · Cited by 429
Jiang, Q., Gholami Derami, H., Ghim, D., Cao, S., Jun, Y.-S., & Singamaneni, S. (2017) · Journal of Materials Chemistry A · doi:10.1039/c7ta04834c · Cited by 322
Vandana, & Das, S. (2022) · Carbohydrate Polymers · doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2022.119536 · Cited by 199
Kadier, A., Ilyas, R. A., Huzaifah, M. R. M., Harihastuti, N., Sapuan, S. M., Harussani, M. M., Azlin, M. N. M., Yuliasni, R., Ibrahim, R., Atikah, M. S. N., et al. (2021) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym13193365 · Cited by 140
Biomass-derived electrodes for flexible supercapacitors
Herou, S., Schlee, P., Jorge, A. B., & Titirici, M. (2018) · Current Opinion in Green and Sustainable Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.cogsc.2017.10.005 · Cited by 77
Metadata
- Authors
- Torres, F., Commeaux, S., & Troncoso, O.
- Venue
- Journal of Functional Biomaterials
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2012-12-05
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 864-878
- ISSN
- 2079-4983 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2050206269
- Cited by
- 268
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Biocompatibility of Bacterial Cellulose Based Biomaterials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/jfb3040864
- The paper
- Torres, F., Commeaux, S., & Troncoso, O. (2012). Biocompatibility of Bacterial Cellulose Based Biomaterials. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb3040864
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.