The DOI matches its Crossref record; 87 of the 87 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-Focus Image Fusion: Algorithms, Evaluation, and a Library
Abstract
Image fusion is a process that integrates similar types of images collected from heterogeneous sources into one image in which the information is more definite and certain. Hence, the resultant image is anticipated as more explanatory and enlightening both for human and machine perception. Different image combination methods have been presented to consolidate significant data from a collection of images into one image. As a result of its applications and advantages in variety of fields such as remote sensing, surveillance, and medical imaging, it is significant to comprehend image fusion algorithms and have a comparative study on them. This paper presents a review of the present state-of-the-art and well-known image fusion techniques. The performance of each algorithm is assessed qualitatively and quantitatively on two benchmark multi-focus image datasets. We also produce a multi-focus image fusion dataset by collecting the widely used test images in different studies. The quantitative evaluation of fusion results is performed using a set of image fusion quality assessment metrics. The performance is also evaluated using different statistical measures. Another contribution of this paper is the proposal of a multi-focus image fusion library, to the best of our knowledge, no such library exists so far. The library provides implementation of numerous state-of-the-art image fusion algorithms and is made available publicly at project website.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity
Wang, Z., Bovik, A. C., Sheikh, H. R., & Simoncelli, E. P. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2003.819861 · Cited by 57,892
Distinctive Image Features from Scale-Invariant Keypoints
Lowe, D. G. (2004) · International Journal of Computer Vision · doi:10.1023/b:visi.0000029664.99615.94 · Cited by 55,589
The Laplacian pyramid as a compact image code
Burt, P., & Adelson, E. (1983) · IEEE Transactions on Communications · doi:10.1109/tcom.1983.1095851 · Cited by 6,077
He, K., Sun, J., & Tang, X. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2012.213 · Cited by 5,546
Greed is Good: Algorithmic Results for Sparse Approximation
Tropp, J. A. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Information Theory · doi:10.1109/tit.2004.834793 · Cited by 3,635
Objective image fusion performance measure
Xydeas, C. S., & Petrović, V. (2000) · Electronics Letters · doi:10.1049/el:20000267 · Cited by 1,996
Sparse Representation for Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Wright, J., Ma, Y., Mairal, J., Sapiro, G., Huang, T. S., & Yan, S. (2010) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2010.2044470 · Cited by 1,847
Image Fusion With Guided Filtering
Li, S., Kang, X., & Hu, J. (2013) · IEEE Transactions on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/tip.2013.2244222 · Cited by 1,781
Multisensor Image Fusion Using the Wavelet Transform
Li, H., Manjunath, B. S., & Mitra, S. K. (1995) · Graphical Models and Image Processing · doi:10.1006/gmip.1995.1022 · Cited by 1,574
Multi-sensor image fusion using the wavelet transform
Li, H., Manjunath, B. S., & Mitra, S. K. (2002) · Proceedings of 1st International Conference on Image Processing · doi:10.1109/icip.1994.413273 · Cited by 1,513
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Adelson, 1984, Pyramid methods in image processing, RCA Eng., 29, 33
- Naidu, 2013, A Novel Image Fusion Technique using DCT based Laplacian Pyramid, Int. J. Inven. Eng. Sci. (IJIES), 1, 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Zafar, R., Farid, M. S., & Khan, M. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Imaging
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-07-02
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 60
- ISSN
- 2313-433X
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 87
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Focus Image Fusion: Algorithms, Evaluation, and a Library. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/jimaging6070060
- The paper
- Zafar, R., Farid, M. S., & Khan, M. H. (2020). Multi-Focus Image Fusion: Algorithms, Evaluation, and a Library. Journal of Imaging. https://doi.org/10.3390/jimaging6070060
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.