A Systematic Review of Recent Deep Learning Approaches for 3D Human Pose Estimation
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Three-dimensional human pose estimation has made significant advancements through the integration of deep learning techniques. This survey provides a comprehensive review of recent 3D human pose estimation methods, with a focus on monocular images, videos, and multi-view cameras. Our approach stands out through a systematic literature review methodology, ensuring an up-to-date and meticulous overview. Unlike many existing surveys that categorize approaches based on learning paradigms, our survey offers a fresh perspective, delving deeper into the subject. For image-based approaches, we not only follow existing categorizations but also introduce and compare significant 2D models. Additionally, we provide a comparative analysis of these methods, enhancing the understanding of image-based pose estimation techniques. In the realm of video-based approaches, we categorize them based on the types of models used to capture inter-frame information. Furthermore, in the context of multi-person pose estimation, our survey uniquely differentiates between approaches focusing on relative poses and those addressing absolute poses. Our survey aims to serve as a pivotal resource for researchers, highlighting state-of-the-art deep learning strategies and identifying promising directions for future exploration in 3D human pose estimation.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Feature Pyramid Networks for Object Detection
Lin, T.-Y., Dollar, P., Girshick, R., He, K., Hariharan, B., & Belongie, S. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.106 · Cited by 30,939 · cited 1× · see citing works
“It infers camera-centric root depths using 2.5D pose and geometry information and then refines the 2.5D pose estimation learning using root depths.”
MethodLoper, M., Mahmood, N., Romero, J., Pons-Moll, G., & J, B. M. (2015) · ACM Transactions on Graphics · doi:10.1145/2816795.2818013 · Cited by 3,734 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Additionally, an ordinal matrix is introduced to select the correct pose estimation, highlighting the ability to handle ordinal ranking.”
MethodHuman3.6M: Large Scale Datasets and Predictive Methods for 3D Human Sensing in Natural Environments
Ionescu, C., Papava, D., Olaru, V., & Sminchisescu, C. (2014) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2013.248 · Cited by 3,653 · cited 1× · see citing works
“The same authors proposed a method in [82] to learn a regression model for 3D pose mapping from videos using CNNs.”
MethodTemporal Convolutional Networks for Action Segmentation and Detection
Lea, C., Flynn, M. D., Vidal, R., Reiter, A., & Hager, G. D. (2017) · 2017 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2017.113 · Cited by 2,238 · cited 24× · see citing works
“By incorporating GCNs to capture the structural relationships between human body joints into their respective frameworks, DiffuPose, learning skeletal graph neural networks, and LCN showcase the effectiveness of graph-based approaches in improving the accuracy and robustness of 3D human pose estimation.”
BackgroundInfluentialHuman Pose Estimation with Iterative Error Feedback
Carreira, J., Agrawal, P., Fragkiadaki, K., & Malik, J. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.512 · Cited by 805 · see citing works
A Comprehensive Survey of Vision-Based Human Action Recognition Methods
Zhang, H.-B., Zhang, Y.-X., Zhong, B., Lei, Q., Yang, L., Du, J.-X., & Chen, D.-S. (2019) · Sensors · doi:10.3390/s19051005 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- El Kaid, A., & Baïna, K.
- Affiliations
- Alqualsadi Research Team, Rabat IT Center, ENSIAS, Mohammed V University in Rabat, Rabat 10112, Morocco
- Venue
- Journal of Imaging
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-12-12
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 275
- ISSN
- 2313-433X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10743718
- OpenAlex
- W4389626868
- Cited by
- 44
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 1
- FWCI
- 1.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of Imaging (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- CIFRE France/Morocco (2018/1635)
- University Mohammed V in Rabat, Morocco (2018/1635)
- ANRT and CNRST (2018/1635)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Human Pose and Action Recognition
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › 3D Shape Modeling and Analysis
- Keywords
- 3D human pose estimation, deep learning, monocular images, video-based pose estimation, multi-view cameras, 2D pose estimation, multi-person pose estimation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review