Cited by 15biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesPolymer crystallization and propertiesPolymer composites and self-healing

Advanced Rheological, Dynamic Mechanical and Thermal Characterization of Phase-Separation Behavior of PLA/PCL Blends

Open access
Ivanov, Evgeni, Kotsilkova, Rumiana, Georgiev, Vladimir, Batakliev, Todor, Angelov, Verislav·2025·Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing

Abstract

This research presents a comprehensive investigation of PLA/PCL polymer blends using advanced rheological characterization, scanning electron microscopy (SEM), differential scanning calorimetry (DSC), and dynamic mechanical, thermal analysis (DMTA) to evaluate phase-separation behavior and functional properties. Polymer composites with various PLA/PCL ratios were fabricated via melt extrusion, a sustainable and scalable approach. The rheological studies revealed significant insights into the blends’ viscoelastic behavior, while SEM analyses provided detailed observations of microstructural phase separation. Thermal transitions and crystallization behaviors were evaluated through DSC, and the dynamic mechanical properties were examined via DMTA. The results confirmed that the tailored PLA/PCL blends exhibit properties suitable for advanced additive manufacturing (AM) and shape memory applications, merging flexibility and environmental sustainability. This study emphasizes the novelty of integrating multidisciplinary characterization methods to unravel the structure–property relationships in PLA/PCL systems. By addressing modern demands for eco-friendly, high-performance materials, this work establishes a foundation for the development of innovative polymer composites with potential applications in smart and responsive technologies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jmmp9020035

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 43 · Cited by 15

Authors
Ivanov, E., Kotsilkova, R., Georgiev, V., Batakliev, T., & Angelov, V.
Affiliations
Bulgarian Academy of Sciences (BG)
Corresponding author
Ivanov, Evgeni
Venue
Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-01-27
Volume
9
Issue
2
Pages
35
ISSN
2504-4494 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406870880
Cited by
15
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7
FWCI
3.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Manufacturing and Materials Processing (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
European Union (BG-RRP-2.011-0001-C01)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer crystallization and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Polymer composites and self-healing
Keywords
PLA/PCL blends, phase separation, polylactic acid, polycaprolactone, polymer blends, melt extrusion, viscoelastic behavior, crystallization behavior, thermal transitions, microstructure, shape memory polymers, additive manufacturing, structure-property relationships, biodegradable polymer composites

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review