The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluating the Genome-Based Average Nucleotide Identity Calculation for Identification of Twelve Yeast Species
Abstract
Classifying a yeast strain into a recognized species is not always straightforward. Currently, the taxonomic delineation of yeast strains involves multiple approaches covering phenotypic characteristics and molecular methodologies, including genome-based analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) calculation through FastANI, a tool created for bacterial species identification, for the assignment of strains to some yeast species. FastANI, the alignment of in silico-extracted D1/D2 sequences of LSU rRNA, and multiple alignments of orthologous genes (MAOG) were employed to analyze 644 assemblies from 12 yeast genera, encompassing various species, and on a dataset of hybrid Saccharomyces species. Overall, the analysis showed high consistency between results obtained with FastANI and MAOG, although, FastANI proved to be more discriminating than the other two methods applied to genomic sequences. In particular, FastANI was effective in distinguishing between strains belonging to different species, defining clear boundaries between them (cutoff: 94–96%). Our results show that FastANI is a reliable method for attributing a known yeast species to a particular strain. Moreover, although hybridization events make species discrimination more complex, it was revealed to be useful in the identification of these cases. We suggest its inclusion as a key component in a comprehensive approach to species delineation. Using this approach with a larger number of yeasts would validate it as a rapid technique to identify yeasts based on whole genome sequences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Trimmomatic: a flexible trimmer for Illumina sequence data
Bolger, A. M., Lohse, M., & Usadel, B. (2014) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu170 · Cited by 65,548
Manni, M., Berkeley, M. R., Seppey, M., Simão, F. A., & Zdobnov, E. M. (2021) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/molbev/msab199 · Cited by 6,187
High throughput ANI analysis of 90K prokaryotic genomes reveals clear species boundaries
Jain, C., Rodriguez-R, L. M., Phillippy, A. M., Konstantinidis, K. T., & Aluru, S. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07641-9 · Cited by 5,748
Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA polymerse II subunit
Liu, Y. J., Whelen, S., & Hall, B. D. (1999) · Molecular Biology and Evolution · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026092 · Cited by 3,828
A standardized bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny substantially revises the tree of life
Parks, D. H., Chuvochina, M., Waite, D. W., Rinke, C., Skarshewski, A., Chaumeil, P.-A., & Hugenholtz, P. (2018) · Nature Biotechnology · doi:10.1038/nbt.4229 · Cited by 3,603
Using SPAdes De Novo Assembler
Prjibelski, A., Antipov, D., Meleshko, D., Lapidus, A., & Korobeynikov, A. (2020) · Current Protocols in Bioinformatics · doi:10.1002/cpbi.102 · Cited by 3,555
Proposed minimal standards for the use of genome data for the taxonomy of prokaryotes
Chun, J., Oren, A., Ventosa, A., Christensen, H. K., Arahal, D. R., da Costa, M. S., Rooney, A. P., Yi, H., Xu, X.-W., Meyer, S. E. D., et al. (2018) · INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SYSTEMATIC AND EVOLUTIONARY MICROBIOLOGY · doi:10.1099/ijsem.0.002516 · Cited by 3,138
Kurtzman, C. P., & Robnett, C. J. (1998) · Antonie van Leeuwenhoek · doi:10.1023/a:1001761008817 · Cited by 2,353
Genome evolution across 1,011 Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates
Peter, J., De Chiara, M., Friedrich, A., Yue, J.-X., Pflieger, D., Bergström, A., Sigwalt, A., Barre, B., Freel, K., Llored, A., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0030-5 · Cited by 1,117
Kuraku, S., Zmasek, C. M., Nishimura, O., & Katoh, K. (2013) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/gkt389 · Cited by 962
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Lachance, 2018, Kurtzman’s Evolving Concepts of Species, Genus and Higher Categories, FEMS Yeast Res., 18, foy103
Metadata
- Authors
- Cortimiglia, C., Alonso-Del-Real, J., Belloso Daza, M. V., Querol, A., Iacono, G., & Cocconcelli, P. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Fungi
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2024-09-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 646
- ISSN
- 2309-608X
- Cited by
- 23
- References
- 61
- Language
- en
- Funders
- European Union—NextGenerationEU (PE00000003, CUP D93C22000890001)
- Italian Ministry of University and Research (PE00000003, CUP D93C22000890001)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the Genome-Based Average Nucleotide Identity Calculation for Identification of Twelve Yeast Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/jof10090646
- The paper
- Cortimiglia, C., Alonso-Del-Real, J., Belloso Daza, M. V., Querol, A., Iacono, G., & Cocconcelli, P. S. (2024). Evaluating the Genome-Based Average Nucleotide Identity Calculation for Identification of Twelve Yeast Species. Journal of Fungi. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090646
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.