Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 23

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Evaluating the Genome-Based Average Nucleotide Identity Calculation for Identification of Twelve Yeast Species

Cortimiglia, Claudia, Alonso-Del-Real, Javier, Belloso Daza, Mireya Viviana, Querol, Amparo, Iacono, Giovanni, Cocconcelli, Pier Sandro·2024·Journal of Fungi

Abstract

Classifying a yeast strain into a recognized species is not always straightforward. Currently, the taxonomic delineation of yeast strains involves multiple approaches covering phenotypic characteristics and molecular methodologies, including genome-based analysis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability of the Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) calculation through FastANI, a tool created for bacterial species identification, for the assignment of strains to some yeast species. FastANI, the alignment of in silico-extracted D1/D2 sequences of LSU rRNA, and multiple alignments of orthologous genes (MAOG) were employed to analyze 644 assemblies from 12 yeast genera, encompassing various species, and on a dataset of hybrid Saccharomyces species. Overall, the analysis showed high consistency between results obtained with FastANI and MAOG, although, FastANI proved to be more discriminating than the other two methods applied to genomic sequences. In particular, FastANI was effective in distinguishing between strains belonging to different species, defining clear boundaries between them (cutoff: 94–96%). Our results show that FastANI is a reliable method for attributing a known yeast species to a particular strain. Moreover, although hybridization events make species discrimination more complex, it was revealed to be useful in the identification of these cases. We suggest its inclusion as a key component in a comprehensive approach to species delineation. Using this approach with a larger number of yeasts would validate it as a rapid technique to identify yeasts based on whole genome sequences.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jof10090646

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lachance, 2018, Kurtzman’s Evolving Concepts of Species, Genus and Higher Categories, FEMS Yeast Res., 18, foy103

Metadata

Authors
Cortimiglia, C., Alonso-Del-Real, J., Belloso Daza, M. V., Querol, A., Iacono, G., & Cocconcelli, P. S.
Venue
Journal of Fungi
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-09-11
Volume
10
Issue
9
Pages
646
ISSN
2309-608X
Cited by
23
References
61
Language
en
Funders
  • European Union—NextGenerationEU (PE00000003, CUP D93C22000890001)
  • Italian Ministry of University and Research (PE00000003, CUP D93C22000890001)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluating the Genome-Based Average Nucleotide Identity Calculation for Identification of Twelve Yeast Species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/jof10090646
The paper
Cortimiglia, C., Alonso-Del-Real, J., Belloso Daza, M. V., Querol, A., Iacono, G., & Cocconcelli, P. S. (2024). Evaluating the Genome-Based Average Nucleotide Identity Calculation for Identification of Twelve Yeast Species. Journal of Fungi. https://doi.org/10.3390/jof10090646

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.