Cited by 30Nanoparticle-Based Drug DeliveryNanoplatforms for cancer theranosticsUltrasound and Hyperthermia Applications

EPR-Effect Enhancers Strongly Potentiate Tumor-Targeted Delivery of Nanomedicines to Advanced Cancers: Further Extension to Enhancement of the Therapeutic Effect

Open access
Islam, Waliul, Kimura, Shintaro, Islam, Rayhanul, Harada, Ayaka, Ono, Katsuhiko, Fang, Jun, Niidome, Takuro, Sawa, Tomohiro +1 more·2021·Journal of Personalized Medicine

Abstract

For more than three decades, enhanced permeability and retention (EPR)-effect-based nanomedicines have received considerable attention for tumor-selective treatment of solid tumors. However, treatment of advanced cancers remains a huge challenge in clinical situations because of occluded or embolized tumor blood vessels, which lead to so-called heterogeneity of the EPR effect. We previously developed a method to restore impaired blood flow in blood vessels by using nitric oxide donors and other agents called EPR-effect enhancers. Here, we show that two novel EPR-effect enhancers—isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN, Nitrol®) and sildenafil citrate—strongly potentiated delivery of three macromolecular drugs to tumors: a complex of poly(styrene-co-maleic acid) (SMA) and cisplatin, named Smaplatin® (chemotherapy); poly(N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide) polymer-conjugated zinc protoporphyrin (photodynamic therapy and imaging); and SMA glucosamine-conjugated boric acid complex (boron neutron capture therapy). We tested these nanodrugs in mice with advanced C26 tumors. When these nanomedicines were administered together with ISDN or sildenafil, tumor delivery and thus positive therapeutic results increased two- to four-fold in tumors with diameters of 15 mm or more. These results confirmed the rationale for using EPR-effect enhancers to restore tumor blood flow. In conclusion, all EPR-effect enhancers tested showed great potential for application in cancer therapy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jpm11060487

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many clinical cancers such as late-stage and refractory tumors are associated with poor blood flow due to coagulation and thrombi formation, exhibiting poor EPR effect.

    “However, many clinical cancers such as late-stage tumors and refractory tumors are associated with poor blood flow due to the coagulation and thrombi formation exhibiting poor EPR effect [7,8,9,10,11,12].”

    From Approaches to Improve EPR-Based Drug Delivery for Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis (2023) · cites this paper as [9]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says that vascular clots or thrombi often suppress blood flow in large clinical tumors, limiting the EPR effect; it also links obstructed blood flow to advanced cancers. It does not specifically identify refractory tumors as having this problem, and notes that some human tumors retain a considerable EPR effect. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The EPR effect can be enhanced by modifying vascular intermediaries such as angiotensin II, nitroglycerin or NO, CO, and enzyme inhibitors.

    “The EPR effect can be enhanced by modifying vascular intermediaries such as angiotensin II, nitroglycerin or NO, CO, and enzyme inhibitors [7,8,9,10].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 30

Authors
Islam, W., Kimura, S., Islam, R., Harada, A., Ono, K., Fang, J., Niidome, T., Sawa, T., & Maeda, H.
Affiliations
  • Kumamoto University (JP)
  • Sojo University (JP)
  • Tohoku University (JP)
Corresponding author
Fang, Jun
Venue
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-28
Volume
11
Issue
6
Pages
487
ISSN
2075-4426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3165051754
Cited by
30
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3
FWCI
1.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (29400001, 17016076, 18H04059)
  • Japan Science and Technology Agency (AS242Z01542Q)
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare (General 001)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications
Keywords
enhanced permeability and retention effect, isosorbide dinitrate, sildenafil, nitric oxide donors, anticancer drug delivery, advanced solid tumors, cisplatin, poly(styrene-co-maleic acid), zinc protoporphyrin, photodynamic therapy, boron neutron capture therapy, C26 colon carcinoma, macromolecular drug delivery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review