Cited by 0Aortic Disease and Treatment ApproachesAcute Kidney Injury ResearchAortic aneurysm repair treatments

Outcomes of Patients with Postoperative Acute Kidney Injury After Acute Type A Aortic Dissection Repair

Open access
Samanidis, George, Kolovou, Kyriaki, Kanakis, Meletios, Katsaridis, Sotirios, Perreas, Konstantinos·2024·Journal of Personalized Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Acute type A aortic dissection (ATAAD) repair is associated with high morbidity postoperatively. The aim of this study is to evaluate the incidence and risk factors for acute kidney injury in patients who underwent ATAAD repair. Patients and Methods: Two hundred and twenty-three patients underwent ATAAD repair. Postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) was evaluated according to the Kidney Disease—Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Results: Postoperative AKI was observed in 140 patients (62.8%). The patients with postoperative AKI classified by KDIGO stages: 1 = 53 (23.8%), 2 = 36 (16.1%), and 3 = 51 (22.9%) patients. Twenty-eight patients (12.6%) underwent replacement renal therapy due to severe renal impairment (KDIGO stage 3). Multivariable logistic regression analysis (adjusted to risk factors) showed that preoperative eGFR was the risk factor for postoperative RRT (odds ratio (OR) = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.92–0.97, p < 0.01). The lengths of hospital and intensive care-unit stay differed between the patients with and without postoperative RRT (p < 0.001 for both). Postoperative RRT was associated with 30-day mortality (10.3% versus 35.7%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Postoperative AKI was associated with high morbidity and mortality rate in patients after ATAAD repair.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jpm15010009

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 17

Authors
Samanidis, G., Kolovou, K., Kanakis, M., Katsaridis, S., & Perreas, K.
Affiliations
Onassis Cardiac Surgery Center (GR)
Corresponding author
Samanidis, George
Venue
Journal of Personalized Medicine
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2024-12-28
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
9
ISSN
2075-4426 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4405968359
Cited by
0
References
17
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Personalized Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Aortic aneurysm repair treatments
Keywords
acute type A aortic dissection, postoperative acute kidney injury, renal replacement therapy, risk factors, estimated glomerular filtration rate, 30-day mortality, ICU length of stay, KDIGO criteria

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review