The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Multi-Party Evolutionary Game Analysis of Accounts Receivable Financing under the Application of Central Bank Digital Currency
Open accessAbstract
Accounts receivable financing is one of the most prominent financing approaches in supply chain finance; nevertheless, in the actual financing process, financial institutions and SMEs have credit risk and information asymmetry risk, which leads to frequent nonpayment and collaboration fraudulent loans. This paper introduces central bank digital currency into traditional accounts receivable financing and solves the credit risk and information asymmetry risk using two technologies of central bank digital currency: digital technology and blockchain technology; digital technology enables the supervision of capital flow, and blockchain technology enables for access to logistics and information flow. In the context of using central bank digital currency technology, this paper builds an evolutionary game model of whether financial institutions use central bank digital currency and whether SMEs repay the loan, compares the evolutionary stabilization strategies of financial institutions and SMEs, calculates and analyzes the model’s impact, investigates changes in the decision-making and evolutionary paths of both parties, and then conducts numerical simulation analysis using Matlab and Python to verify the model’s reliability further. According to the results, adding central bank digital currency to the traditional accounts receivable financing model can reduce the loan risk of financial institutions, increase the credibility of accounts receivable financing, expedite the implementation of accounts receivable financing, and alleviate the financing concerns of SMEs.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Zhigang, Z., Liu, Y., Yu, H., & Chen, Q. (2020) · Microprocessors and Microsystems · doi:10.1016/j.micpro.2020.103589 · Cited by 21
RetractedBlockchain technology and its relationships to sustainable supply chain management
Saberi, S., Kouhizadeh, M., Sarkis, J., & Shen, L. (2019) · International Journal of Production Research · doi:10.1080/00207543.2018.1533261 · Cited by 4,118
Smart Contract Development: Challenges and Opportunities
Zou, W., Lo, D., Kochhar, P. S., Le, X.-B. D., Xia, X., Feng, Y., Chen, Z., & Xu, B. (2019) · IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering · doi:10.1109/tse.2019.2942301 · Cited by 729
Chang, S., Chen, Y.-C., & Lu, M. (2019) · Technological forecasting & social change · doi:10.1016/j.techfore.2019.03.015 · Cited by 544
Supply chain finance: a literature review
Gelsomino, L. M., Mangiaracina, R., Perego, A., & Tumino, A. (2016) · International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management · doi:10.1108/ijpdlm-08-2014-0173 · Cited by 532
Supply Chain Finance Innovation Using Blockchain
Du, M., Chen, Q., Xiao, J., Yang, H., & Ma, X. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management · doi:10.1109/tem.2020.2971858 · Cited by 441
Lim, M. K., Li, Y., Wang, C., & Tseng, M. (2021) · Computers & Industrial Engineering · doi:10.1016/j.cie.2021.107133 · Cited by 428
Blockchain-based authentication and authorization for smart city applications
Esposito, C., Ficco, M., & Gupta, B. B. (2020) · Information Processing & Management · doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102468 · Cited by 406
Fintech, Cryptocurrencies, and CBDC: Financial Structural Transformation in China
Allen, F., Gu, X., & Jagtiani, J. A. (2022) · Journal of International Money and Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jimonfin.2022.102625 · Cited by 398
Centrally Banked Cryptocurrencies
Danezis, G., & Meiklejohn, S. (2016) · Network and Distributed System Security Symposium · doi:10.14722/ndss.2016.23187 · Cited by 310
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital financial inclusion and quality of economic growth
Xi, W., & Wang, Y. (2023) · Heliyon · doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e19731 · Cited by 76
Filling the SME credit gap: a systematic review of blockchain-based SME finance literature
Kumar, D., Phani, B. V., Chilamkurti, N., Saurabh, S., & Ratten, V. (2023) · Journal of Trade Science · doi:10.1108/jts-06-2023-0003 · Cited by 58
Does digital transformation improve the cost efficiency of commercial banks? Evidence from China
Shen, C., Wu, J., Li, Y., & Chen, Q. (2024) · Finance research letters · doi:10.1016/j.frl.2024.106619 · Cited by 44
Blockchain applications in the construction supply chain
Heydari, M., & Shojaei, A. (2025) · Automation in Construction · doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2025.105998 · Cited by 27
Blockchain-enabled enterprise bleaching green regulation banking evolution game analysis
Xu, L., & Tian, T. (2023) · Environment Development and Sustainability · doi:10.1007/s10668-023-03768-y · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, Q., Yang, D., & Qin, J.
- Affiliations
- Intelligent Manufacturing Technology & System, China (Shanghai) Institute of FTZ Supply Chain, Shanghai 200120, China
- Shanghai Maritime University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Yang, Dihong
- Venue
- Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2023-02-20
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 394-415
- ISSN
- 0718-1876 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4321371263
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 37
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6
- FWCI
- 5.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Journal of theoretical and applied electronic commerce research (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Blockchain Technology Applications and Security
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Supply Chain and Inventory Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Accounting › Working Capital and Financial Performance
- Keywords
- receivables financing, central bank digital currency, supply chain finance, credit risk, information asymmetry, blockchain, SME financing, financial institutions, evolutionary game model, loan repayment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
