Cited by 4Animal Behavior and Welfare StudiesPrimate Behavior and EcologyAnimal Behavior and Reproduction

Age and social history impact social interactions between bull Asian elephants (Elephas maximus) at Denver Zoo

Open access
Readyhough, Taylor S., Davis, Maura, Joseph, Sharon, Moresco, Anneke, Schreier, Amy L.·2023·Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens

Abstract

Wild bull Asian elephants spend time in all-male groups. Therefore, managers of ex situ populations increasingly house bulls together. We examined the social interactions of five bull Asian elephants at Denver Zoo, using instantaneous sampling to compare social interactions across adolescent and mature bulls, and bulls with a social history prior to the integration of this group compared to bulls with no social history. Both age and social history significantly affected bull behavior. Adolescent bulls exhibited more affiliative and submissive behaviors when housed with mixed-age and mature social partners compared to with only adolescents, and less non-contact agonistic behavior and less time in proximity to a conspecific with mixed-age groups compared to with only other adolescents. Mature bulls exhibited more affiliative behavior when they were with only adolescent bulls compared to only mature bulls, and more time in proximity to a conspecific and increased contact agonistic behavior with at least one adolescent compared to only mature bulls. Bulls in new social groups engaged in more affiliative, agonistic, and submissive behaviors, and spent less time in proximity, than when they were in previously established social combinations. As more institutions house bulls socially, our results provide insights into factors that may affect bull social interactions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/jzbg4010018

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The selected behaviors were grouped into categories considered functionally similar and defined as aggressive, affiliative, submissive, and other.

    “The selected behaviors were then grouped into categories considered functionally similar [26,23,43–45] and were defined as aggressive, affiliative, submissive, and other.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 4

Authors
Readyhough, T. S., Davis, M., Joseph, S., Moresco, A., & Schreier, A. L.
Affiliations
  • Regis University (US)
  • Denver Zoo (US)
Corresponding author
Readyhough, Taylor S.
Venue
Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-03-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
191-213
ISSN
2673-5636 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4322774676
Cited by
4
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1
FWCI
1.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Zoological and Botanical Gardens (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Association of Zoos and Aquariums (18-1523)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Primate Behavior and Ecology
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
Keywords
Asian elephant, social interaction, age effects, social history, affiliative behavior, agonistic behavior, submissiveness, captive elephants, zoo animal welfare

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review