The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles for Wound Healing Application: Progress and Future Trends
Open accessAbstract
Recent data have reported that the burden of infections related to antibiotic-resistant bacteria in the European Union and European Economic Area (EEA) can be estimated as the cumulative burden of tuberculosis, influenza, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). In wound management, the control of infections represents a crucial issue and a multi-billion dollar industry worldwide. For diabetic wounds ulcers, in particular, infections are related to the majority of amputations in diabetic patients, which today represent an increasing number of the elderly. The greatest barrier to healing is represented by the biofilm, an organized consortium of bacteria encapsulated in a self-produced extracellular polymeric substance with high resistance to conventional antimicrobial therapies. There is an urgent need for novel anti-biofilm strategies and novel antimicrobial agents and, in this scenario, silver nanotechnology has received tremendous attention in recent years in therapeutically enhanced healthcare. Due to its intrinsic therapeutic properties and the broad-spectrum antimicrobial efficacy, silver nanoparticles have opened new horizons towards novel approaches in the control of infections in wound healing. This review aims at providing the reader with an overview of the most recent progress in silver nanotechnology, with a special focus on the role of silver in the wound healing process.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The antimicrobial activity of nanoparticles: present situation and prospects for the future
Wang, L., Hu, C., & Shao, L. (2017) · International Journal of Nanomedicine · doi:10.2147/ijn.s121956 · Cited by 4,062
Strategies for combating bacterial biofilm infections
Wu, H., Moser, C., Wang, H.-Z., Høiby, N., & Song, Z.-J. (2015) · International Journal of Oral Science · doi:10.1038/ijos.2014.65 · Cited by 925
Syafiuddin, A., Salmiati, Salim, M. R., Beng Hong Kueh, A., Hadibarata, T., & Nur, H. (2017) · Journal of the Chinese Chemical Society · doi:10.1002/jccs.201700067 · Cited by 415
Cited by
Silver Nanoparticles: Bactericidal and Mechanistic Approach against Drug Resistant Pathogens
More, P. R., Pandit, S., Filippis, A. D., Franci, G., Mijakovic, I., & Galdiero, M. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11020369 · Cited by 745
A review of current advancements for wound healing: Biomaterial applications and medical devices
Deng, X., Gould, M., & Ali, M. A. (2022) · Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part B: Applied Biomaterials · doi:10.1002/jbm.b.35086 · Cited by 355
Maghimaa, M., & Alharbi, S. A. (2020) · Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology B: Biology · doi:10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2020.111806 · Cited by 253
Metadata
- Authors
- Paladini, F., & Pollini, M.
- Venue
- Materials
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-08-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 2540
- ISSN
- 1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2968441064
- Cited by
- 540
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 16.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles for Wound Healing Application: Progress and Future Trends. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/ma12162540
- The paper
- Paladini, F., & Pollini, M. (2019). Antimicrobial Silver Nanoparticles for Wound Healing Application: Progress and Future Trends. Materials. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12162540
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
