Cited by 12Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchZeolite Catalysis and SynthesisMagnesium Oxide Properties and Applications

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Formation of Geopolymers Using Sodium Silicate Solution and Aluminum Orthophosphate

Open access

Abstract

This paper reports the formation and structure of fast setting geopolymers activated by using three sodium silicate solutions with different modules (1.6, 2.0 and 2.4) and a berlinite-type aluminum orthophosphate. By varying the concentration of the aluminum orthophosphate, different Si/Al-ratios were established (6, 3 and 2). Reaction kinetics of binders were determined by isothermal calorimetric measurements at 20 °C. X-ray diffraction analysis as well as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) measurements were performed on binders to determine differences in structure by varying the alkalinity of the sodium silicate solutions and the Si/Al-ratio. The calorimetric results indicated that the higher the alkalinity of the sodium silicate solution, the higher the solubility and degree of conversion of the aluminum orthophosphate. The results of X-ray diffraction and Rietveldt analysis, as well as the NMR measurements, confirmed the assumption of the calorimetric experiments that first the aluminum orthophosphate was dissolved and then a polycondensation to an amorphous aluminosilicate network occurred. The different amounts of amorphous phases formed as a function of the alkalinity of the sodium silicate solution, indicate that tetrahydroxoaluminate species were formed during the dissolution of the aluminum orthophosphate, which reduce the pH value. This led to no further dissolution of the aluminum orthophosphate, which remained unreacted.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ma13184202

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Static 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of used silica solutions.
Figure 1 Static 29Si nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of used silica solutions.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the used aluminum orthophosphate.
Figure 2 Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) image of the used aluminum orthophosphate.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 27Al MAS NMR spectrum (a) and the 31P MAS NMR spectrum (b) of the used AlPO4.
Figure 3 27Al MAS NMR spectrum (a) and the 31P MAS NMR spectrum (b) of the used AlPO4.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Calorimetric measurements of the reaction kinetics of sodium silicate solution (module: 1.6) and different Si/Al-ratios of 2, 3 and 6.
Figure 4 Calorimetric measurements of the reaction kinetics of sodium silicate solution (module: 1.6) and different Si/Al-ratios of 2, 3 and 6.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Calorimetric measurements of the reaction kinetics of sodium silicate solution (module: 2.0) and different Si/Al-ratios of 2, 3 and 6.
Figure 5 Calorimetric measurements of the reaction kinetics of sodium silicate solution (module: 2.0) and different Si/Al-ratios of 2, 3 and 6.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 6 Calorimetric measurements of the reaction kinetics of sodium silicate solution (module: 2.4) and different Si/Al-ratios of 2, 3 and 6.
Figure 6 Calorimetric measurements of the reaction kinetics of sodium silicate solution (module: 2.4) and different Si/Al-ratios of 2, 3 and 6.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 7 Phase composition of the formed geopolymer binders using a Si/Al-ratio of 6 and different sodium silicate solution (SiO2/Na2O = 1.6, 2.0 and 2.4).
Figure 7 Phase composition of the formed geopolymer binders using a Si/Al-ratio of 6 and different sodium silicate solution (SiO2/Na2O = 1.6, 2.0 and 2.4).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 8 Phase composition of the formed geopolymer binders using a Si/Al-ratio of 3 and different sodium silicate solution (SiO2/Na2O = 1.6, 2.0 and 2.4).
Figure 8 Phase composition of the formed geopolymer binders using a Si/Al-ratio of 3 and different sodium silicate solution (SiO2/Na2O = 1.6, 2.0 and 2.4).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 9 Phase composition of the formed geopolymer using a Si/Al-ratio of 2 and different sodium silicate solution (SiO2/Na2O = 1.6, 2.0 and 2.4).
Figure 9 Phase composition of the formed geopolymer using a Si/Al-ratio of 2 and different sodium silicate solution (SiO2/Na2O = 1.6, 2.0 and 2.4).CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 10 Static 29Si NMR of silica solution (SiO2/Na2O = 2.4, 2.0 and 1.6, dotted lines) and 29Si MAS NMR of binders A-C (solid lines), formed by addition of berlinite (Si/Al = 3) to these solutions.
Figure 10 Static 29Si NMR of silica solution (SiO2/Na2O = 2.4, 2.0 and 1.6, dotted lines) and 29Si MAS NMR of binders A-C (solid lines), formed by addition of berlinite (Si/Al = 3) to these solutions.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 11 Static 29Si NMR of silica solution (SiO2/Na2O = 1.6, red dotted line) and 29Si MAS NMR of binders C-E, formed by addition of berlinite (Si/Al = 2, 3 and 6) to this solution.
Figure 11 Static 29Si NMR of silica solution (SiO2/Na2O = 1.6, red dotted line) and 29Si MAS NMR of binders C-E, formed by addition of berlinite (Si/Al = 2, 3 and 6) to this solution.CC BY · PubMed Central
Scheme 1 Dissolution reaction of berlinite under alkaline conditions.
Scheme 1 Dissolution reaction of berlinite under alkaline conditions.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 12 27Al MAS NMR spectra of binders A–E.
Figure 12 27Al MAS NMR spectra of binders A–E.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 13 31P MAS NMR spectra of binders A–E.
Figure 13 31P MAS NMR spectra of binders A–E.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Scrivener, 2018, Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry, Cem. Concr. Res., 114, 2, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2018.03.015 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Davidovits, 1991, Geopolymers, J. Therm. Anal., 37, 1633, 10.1007/BF01912193 · DOI
  3. Singh, N.B., and Middendorf, B. (2020). Geopolymers as an alternative to Portland cement: An Overview. Constr. Build. Mater., 237. · DOI
  4. Gharzouni, 2015, Effect of reactivity of alkaline solution and metakaolin on the geopolymer formation, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 410, 127, 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2014.12.021 · DOI
  5. Cao, 2005, Synthesis and structure characterization of geopolymeric material based on metakaolinite and phosphoric acid, Kuei Suan Jen Hsueh Pao/J. Chin. Ceram. Soc., 33, 1385
  6. Celerier, 2018, Composition and properties of phosphoric acid-based geopolymers, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 493, 94, 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2018.04.044 · DOI
  7. Kamseu, 2017, Influence of the molar concentration of phosphoric acid solution on the properties of metakaolin-phosphate-based geopolymer cements, Appl. Clay Sci., 147, 184, 10.1016/j.clay.2017.07.036 · DOI
  8. 2017, Mechanical and microstructural properties of metakaolin-based geopolymer cements from sodium waterglass and phosphoric acid solution as hardeners: A comparative study, Appl. Clay Sci., 140, 81, 10.1016/j.clay.2017.02.002 · DOI
  9. Douiri, 2014, Structural, thermal and dielectric properties of phosphoric acid-based geopolymers with different amounts of H3PO4, Mater. Lett., 116, 9, 10.1016/j.matlet.2013.10.075 · DOI
  10. Douiri, 2016, Enhanced dielectric performance of metakaolin–H3PO4 geopolymers, Mater. Lett., 164, 299, 10.1016/j.matlet.2015.10.172 · DOI
  11. Liu, 2012, The phase evolution of phosphoric acid-based geopolymers at elevated temperatures, Mater. Lett., 66, 10, 10.1016/j.matlet.2011.08.043 · DOI
  12. Louati, 2016, Acid based geopolymerization kinetics: Effect of clay particle size, Appl. Clay Sci., 132–133, 571, 10.1016/j.clay.2016.08.007 · DOI
  13. Wang, 2017, Phosphate-based geopolymer: Formation mechanism and thermal stability, Mater. Lett., 190, 209, 10.1016/j.matlet.2017.01.022 · DOI
  14. Zribi, 2019, Effect of curing temperature on the synthesis, structure and mechanical properties of phosphate-based geopolymers, J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 511, 62, 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2019.01.032 · DOI
  15. Bothe, 1993, Low-Temperature Formation of Aluminum Orthophosphate, J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 76, 362, 10.1111/j.1151-2916.1993.tb03793.x · DOI
  16. Perera, 2008, Relative strengths of phosphoric acid-reacted and alkali-reacted metakaolin materials, J. Mater. Sci., 43, 6562, 10.1007/s10853-008-2913-6 · DOI
  17. Engelhardt, 1975, 29Si-NMR-Spektroskopie an Silicatlösungen. II. Zur Abhängigkeit der Struktur der Silicatanionen in wäßrigen Natriumsilicatlösungen vom Na: Si-Verhältnis, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 418, 17, 10.1002/zaac.19754180103 · DOI
  18. Favier, 2015, A multinuclear static NMR study of geopolymerisation, Cem. Concr. Res., 75, 104, 10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.03.003 · DOI
  19. Grunze, 1983, Hochfeld-27Al-NMR-Untersuchungen zur Aluminiumkoordination in kristallinen Aluminiumphosphaten, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 500, 80, 10.1002/zaac.19835000511 · DOI
  20. Jahn, 1984, High-resolution solid-state 27Al and 31P NMR: Correlation between chemical shift and mean Al-O-P angle in AlPO4 polymorphs, Chem. Phys. Lett., 109, 332, 10.1016/0009-2614(84)85596-7 · DOI
  21. Turner, 1986, Structure and cation effects on phosphorus-31 NMR chemical shifts and chemical-shift anisotropies of orthophosphates, J. Magn. Reason., 70, 408
  22. Lippmaa, 1980, Structural studies of silicates by solid-state high-resolution silicon-29 NMR, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 102, 4889, 10.1021/ja00535a008 · DOI
  23. Engelhardt, 1982, Si-29 Nmr Investigations on the Anion Structure of Crystalline Tetramethylammonium-Aluminosilicates and Aluminosilicate Solutions, Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem., 484, 22, 10.1002/zaac.19824840103 · DOI
  24. MacKenzie, 2010, A new hydroxide-based synthesis method for inorganic polymers, J. Mater. Sci., 45, 3284, 10.1007/s10853-010-4340-8 · DOI
  25. Barbosa, 2000, Synthesis and characterisation of materials based on inorganic polymers of alumina and silica: Sodium polysialate polymers, Int. J. Inorg. Mater., 2, 309, 10.1016/S1466-6049(00)00041-6 · DOI
  26. Shigenobu, 1989, High-Resolution Solid-State 31P NMR of Alkali Phosphates, Bull. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 62, 3061, 10.1246/bcsj.62.3061 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Partschefeld, S., Wiegand, T., Bellmann, F., & Osburg, A.
Affiliations
Bauhaus-Universität Weimar (DE)
Corresponding author
Partschefeld, Stephan
Venue
Materials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2020-09-21
Volume
13
Issue
18
Pages
4202
ISSN
1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3087219239
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Publication Server of Weimar Bauhaus-University (Weimar Bauhaus-University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Zeolite Catalysis and Synthesis
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Magnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
Keywords
geopolymer, sodium silicate solution, berlinite, Si/Al ratio, alkalinity, reaction kinetics, calorimetry, polycondensation, binder structure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review