Cited by 37biodegradable polymer synthesis and propertiesNatural Fiber Reinforced CompositesNanocomposite Films for Food Packaging

Modern Biodegradable Plastics—Processing and Properties Part II

Open access
Sikora, Janusz W., Majewski, Łukasz, Puszka, Andrzej·2021·Materials

Abstract

Four different plastics were tested: potato starch based plastic (TPS-P)–BIOPLAST GF 106/02; corn starch based plastic (TPS-C)–BioComp BF 01HP; polylactic acid (polylactide) plastic (PLA)—BioComp BF 7210 and low density polyethylene, trade name Malen E FABS 23-D022; as a petrochemical reference sample. Using the blown film extrusion method and various screw rotational speeds, films were obtained and tested, as a result of which the following were determined: breaking stress, strain at break, static and dynamic friction coefficient of film in longitudinal and transverse direction, puncture resistance and strain at break, color, brightness and gloss of film, surface roughness, barrier properties and microstructure. The biodegradable plastics tested are characterized by comparable or even better mechanical strength than petrochemical polyethylene for the range of film blowing processing parameters used here. The effect of the screw rotational speed on the mechanical characteristics of the films obtained was also demonstrated. With the increase in the screw rotational speed, the decrease of barrier properties was also observed. No correlation between roughness and permeability of gases and water vapor was shown. It was indicated that biodegradable plastics might be competitive for conventional petrochemical materials used in film blowing niche applications where cost, recyclability, optical and water vapor barrier properties are not critical.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ma14102523

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Sikora, J. W., Majewski, Ł., & Puszka, A.
Affiliations
  • Lublin University of Technology (PL)
  • Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (PL)
Corresponding author
Sikora, Janusz W.
Venue
Materials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-05-12
Volume
14
Issue
10
Pages
2523
ISSN
1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4245536219
Cited by
37
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 1
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Polish Ministry of Science and Higher Education (030/RID/2018/19)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Polymers and Plastics › Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
Keywords
biodegradable plastics, starch-based bioplastics, potato starch, corn starch, polylactic acid, low-density polyethylene, blown film extrusion, screw speed, mechanical properties, barrier properties, water vapor permeability, gas permeability, surface roughness, puncture resistance, friction coefficient, film microstructure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review