Cited by 19Concrete and Cement Materials ResearchMicrobial Applications in Construction MaterialsMaterials Engineering and Processing

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Utilization of a PFA-GGBS-Based Precursor in Geopolymer Concrete Production as a Sustainable Substitute for Conventional Concrete

Open access

Abstract

Awareness of environmental sustainability is driving the shift from conventional Portland cement, a major contributor to carbon dioxide emissions, to more sustainable alternatives. This study focuses on developing a geopolymer concrete by optimizing geopolymer concrete mixtures with various ratios of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag (GGBS) and pulverized fly ash (PFA) as precursors, aiming to find a mix that maximizes strength while minimizing environmental impacts. The precursor was activated using a laboratory-synthesized silica fume (SF)-derived sodium silicate solution in combination with NaOH at a molarity of 10M. This study aims to find the optimal geopolymer concrete mix with a 0.55 water-to-binder ratio, a 0.40 alkali-to-precursor ratio, and a 1:1 sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratio. Ordinary Portland cement was used as the control mix binder (C), while the geopolymer mixes included varying GGBS-PFA compositions [CL0 (50% GGBS—50% PFA), CL1 (60% GGBS—40% PFA), CL2 (70% GGBS—30% PFA), CL3 (80% GGBS—20% PFA), and CL4 (90% GGBS—10% PFA)]. The engineering performance of the mixtures was assessed using slump, unconfined compressive strength, split tensile, and flexural strength tests in accordance with their relevant standards. Observations showed that GPC specimens exhibited similar or slightly higher strength values than conventional concrete using PC. In addition to strength, geopolymers have a smaller environmental footprint, consuming less energy and reducing greenhouse gas emissions. These qualities make geopolymer concrete a sustainable construction option that aligns with global efforts to reduce carbon emissions and conserve resources.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/ma18061309

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 Slump data for fresh OPC and geopolymer concrete mixes.
Figure 1 Slump data for fresh OPC and geopolymer concrete mixes.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 2 Mean density of hardened concrete.
Figure 2 Mean density of hardened concrete.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 3 Compressive strength results at various curing times of concrete mixtures.
Figure 3 Compressive strength results at various curing times of concrete mixtures.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 4 Mean split tensile strength (N/mm2) of concrete mixtures after 28 days of curing.
Figure 4 Mean split tensile strength (N/mm2) of concrete mixtures after 28 days of curing.CC BY · PubMed Central
Figure 5 Flexural strength of concrete specimen after 28 days of curing.
Figure 5 Flexural strength of concrete specimen after 28 days of curing.CC BY · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Younes, 2023, Incorporating coarse and fine recycled aggregates into concrete mixes: Mechanical characterization and environmental impact, J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag., 26, 654, 10.1007/s10163-023-01834-1 · DOI
  2. Tam, 2018, A review of recycled aggregate in concrete applications (2000–2017), Constr. Build. Mater., 172, 272, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.03.240 · DOI
  3. Baltazar, L.G. (2022). Performance of Silica Fume-Based Geopolymer Grouts for Heritage Masonry Consolidation. Crystals, 12. · DOI
  4. Fernandes, 2021, Controlling efflorescence in geopolymers: A new approach, Case Stud. Constr. Mater., 15, e00740
  5. Altameemi, S., Adeleke, B.O., Kinuthia, J.M., and Oti, J. (2025). Understanding the Effect of Waiting for the Dissolution of Sodium Hydroxide in Geopolymer Concrete Mixes. Materials, 18. · DOI
  6. Farhan, 2020, Assessment of important parameters involved in the synthesis of geopolymer composites: A review, Constr. Build. Mater., 264, 120276, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.120276 · DOI
  7. Kong, 2008, Damage behavior of geopolymer composites exposed to elevated temperatures, Cem. Concr. Compos., 30, 986, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2008.08.001 · DOI
  8. Davidovits, J. (1994). Properties of Geopolymer cements. First International Conference on Alkaline Cements and Concretes, Scientific Research Institute on Binders and Materials.
  9. Palomo, 1999, Alkali-activated fly ashes: A cement for the future, Cem. Concr. Res., 29, 1323, 10.1016/S0008-8846(98)00243-9 · DOI
  10. Lee, 2004, The interface between natural siliceous aggregates and geopolymers, Cem. Concr. Res., 34, 195, 10.1016/S0008-8846(03)00250-3 · DOI
  11. Herbert, 2011, Life cycle assessment (LCA) of alkali-activated cements and concretes, Cem. Concr. Res., 41, 442
  12. Reddy, 2018, Mix design development of fly ash and ground granulated blast furnace slag based geopolymer concrete, J. Build. Eng., 20, 712, 10.1016/j.jobe.2018.09.010 · DOI
  13. Hadi, 2019, Optimum mix design of geopolymer pastes and concretes cured in ambient condition based on compressive strength, setting time and workability, J. Build. Eng., 23, 301, 10.1016/j.jobe.2019.02.006 · DOI
  14. Rafeet, 2017, Guidelines for mix proportioning of fly ash/GGBS based alkali activated concretes, Constr. Build. Mater., 147, 130, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.04.036 · DOI
  15. Li, 2018, A mixture proportioning method for the development of performance-based alkali-activated slag-based concrete, Cem. Concr. Compos., 93, 163, 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2018.07.009 · DOI
  16. Oti, J., Adeleke, B.O., Mudiyanselage, P.R., and Kinuthia, J. (2024). A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of GGBS-Based Geopolymer Concrete Activated by a Rice Husk Ash-Synthesised Sodium Silicate Solution and Sodium Hydroxide. Recycling, 9. · DOI
  17. Nath, 2014, Effect of GGBFS on setting, workability and early strength properties of fly ash geopolymer concrete cured in ambient condition, Constr. Build. Mater., 66, 163, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.05.080 · DOI
  18. Hadi, 2017, Design of geopolymer concrete with GGBFS at ambient curing condition using Taguchi method, Constr. Build. Mater., 140, 424, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.02.131 · DOI
  19. Billong, 2021, Using silica fume based activator in sustainable geopolymer binder for building application, Constr. Build. Mater., 275, 122177, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.122177 · DOI
  20. Adeleke, B.O., Kinuthia, J.M., Oti, J., and Ebailila, M. (2023). Physico-Mechanical Evaluation of Geopolymer Concrete Activated by Sodium Hydroxide and Silica Fume-Synthesised Sodium Silicate Solution. Materials, 16. · DOI · Paper page
  21. Xu, 2000, The geopolymerisation of alumino-silicate minerals, Int. J. Miner. Process., 59, 247, 10.1016/S0301-7516(99)00074-5 · DOI
  22. 2018, A quantitative method of approach in designing the mix proportions of fly ash and GGBS-based geopolymer concrete, Aust. J. Civ. Eng., 16, 53, 10.1080/14488353.2018.1450716 · DOI
  23. Rangan, B.V. (2008). Fly Ash-Based Geopolymer Concrete, Faculty of Engineering, Curtin University of Technology. Research Report GC4. · DOI
  24. Provis, 2014, Geopolymers and Related Alkali-Activated Materials, Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 44, 299, 10.1146/annurev-matsci-070813-113515 · DOI
  25. Adam, 2019, The Effects of Water to Solid Ratio, Activator to Binder Ratio, and Lime Proportion on the Compressive Strength of Ambient-Cured Geopolymer Concrete, J. Civ. Eng. Forum, 5, 161, 10.22146/jcef.43878 · DOI
  26. Kamarudin, 2012, Correlation between Na2SiO3/NaOH ratio and fly ash/alkaline activator ratio to the strength of geopolymer, Mater. Manuf. Technol. II, 341–342, 189
  27. Liyana, 2014, Effect of fly ash/alkaline activator ratio and sodium silicate/NaOH ratio on fly ash geopolymer coating strength, Key Eng. Mater., 594–595, 146
  28. Smith, 2020, The impact of fly ash and silica fume on the compressive strength of concrete, J. Mater. Civ. Eng., 32, 6
  29. Choudhary, 2020, Impact on fresh, mechanical, and microstructural properties of high strength self-compacting concrete by marble cutting slurry waste, fly ash, and silica fume, Constr. Build. Mater., 239, 117888, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.117888 · DOI
  30. Rao, 2017, Flexural & Tensile Strength Properties of GGBS and Phosphogypsum Blended Geopolymer Concrete, Int. J. ChemTech Res., 10, 661

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Oti, J., Adeleke, B. O., Casabuena, L. R., Kinuthia, J. M., & Sule, S.
Affiliations
  • University of South Wales (GB)
  • University of Port Harcourt (NG)
Corresponding author
Adeleke, Blessing O.
Venue
Materials
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-03-16
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1309
ISSN
1996-1944 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4408533860
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 8
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Concrete and Cement Materials Research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Applications in Construction Materials
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Materials Engineering and Processing
Keywords
geopolymer concrete, ground granulated blast furnace slag, pulverized fly ash, sodium silicate activation, sodium hydroxide, cement replacement, compressive strength, splitting tensile strength, flexural strength, slump, water-to-binder ratio, CO2 emission reduction, sustainable construction materials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review