Cited by 41Topic ModelingAdvanced Graph Neural NetworksSemantic Web and Ontologies

Knowledge Graphs and Their Reciprocal Relationship with Large Language Models

Open access
Dehal, Ramandeep Singh, Sharma, Mehak, Rajabi, Enayat·2025·Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction

Abstract

The reciprocal relationship between Large Language Models (LLMs) and Knowledge Graphs (KGs) highlights their synergistic potential in enhancing artificial intelligence (AI) applications. LLMs, with their natural language understanding and generative capabilities, support the automation of KG construction through entity recognition, relation extraction, and schema generation. Conversely, KGs serve as structured and interpretable data sources that improve the transparency, factual consistency and reliability of LLM-based applications, mitigating challenges such as hallucinations and lack of explainability. This study conducts a systematic literature review of 77 studies to examine AI methodologies supporting LLM–KG integration, including symbolic AI, machine learning, and hybrid approaches. The research explores diverse applications spanning healthcare, finance, justice, and industrial automation, revealing the transformative potential of this synergy. Through in-depth analysis, this study identifies key limitations in current approaches, including challenges in scalability with maintaining dynamic and real-time Knowledge Graphs, difficulty in adapting general-purpose LLMs to specialized domains, limited explainability in tracing model outputs to interpretable reasoning, and ethical concerns surrounding bias, fairness, and transparency. In response, the study highlights potential strategies to optimize LLM–KG synergy. The findings from this study provide actionable insights for researchers and practitioners aiming for robust, transparent, and adaptive AI systems to enhance knowledge-driven AI applications through LLM–KG integration, further advancing generative AI and explainable AI (XAI) applications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/make7020038

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Structured data integration significantly enhances LLM capabilities across multiple dimensions, with knowledge graphs providing structured information that reduces hallucinations by grounding responses in verifiable facts and improving factual accuracy through clearly defined information sources.

    “Structured data integration significantly enhances LLM capabilities across multiple dimensions, with knowledge graphs providing structured information that reduces hallucinations by grounding responses in verifiable facts and improving factual accuracy through clearly defined information sources [1010, 1352, 204, 571].”

    From A Survey of Context Engineering for Large Language Models (2025) · cites this paper as [204]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 98

  1. Qin, C.; Zhang, A.; Zhang, Z.; Chen, J.; Yasunaga, M.; Yang, D. Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver? arXiv 2023, arXiv:2302.06476. · arXiv
  2. Danilevsky, M.; Qian, K.; Aharonov, R.; Katsis, Y.; Kawas, B.; Sen, P. A Survey of the State of Explainable AI for Natural Language Processing. arXiv 2020, arXiv:2010.00711. · arXiv
  3. Pan, J.Z.; Razniewski, S.; Kalo, J.C.; Singhania, S.; Chen, J.; Dietze, S.; Jabeen, H.; Omeliyanenko, J.; Zhang, W.; Lissandrini, M.; et al. Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs: Opportunities and Challenges. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2308.06374. · arXiv
  4. Rajabi, E.; Etminani, K. Knowledge-graph-based explainable AI: A systematic review. J. Inf. Sci. 2024, 50, 1019-1029.
  5. Ibrahim, N.; Aboulela, S.; Ibrahim, A.; Kashef, R. A survey on augmenting Knowledge Graphs (KGs) with large language models (LLMs): Models, evaluation metrics, benchmarks, and challenges. Discov. Artif. Intell. 2024, 4, 76. [CrossRef] · DOI
  6. Bommasani, R.; Hudson, D.A.; Adeli, E.; Altman, R.; Arora, S.; Arx, S.v.; Bernstein, M.S.; Bohg, J.; Bosselut, A.; Brunskill, E.; et al. On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models. arXiv 2022, arXiv:2108.07258. · arXiv
  7. Li, D.; Xu, F. Synergizing Knowledge Graphs with Large Language Models: A Comprehensive Review and Future Prospects. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2407.18470. · arXiv
  8. Brown, T.; Mann, B.; Ryder, N.; Subbiah, M.; Kaplan, J.D.; Dhariwal, P.; Neelakantan, A.; Shyam, P.; Sastry, G.; Askell, A.; et al. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners. Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. 2020, 33, 1877-1901.
  9. Adhikari, A.; Wenink, E.; van der Waa, J.; Bouter, C.; Tolios, I.; Raaijmakers, S. Towards FAIR Explainable AI: A standardized ontology for mapping XAI solutions to use cases, explanations, and AI systems. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, New York, NY, USA, 29 June-1 July 2022; pp. 562-568. [CrossRef] · DOI
  10. Ananya, A.; Tiwari, S.; Mihindukulasooriya, N.; Soru, T.; Xu, Z.; Moussallem, D. Towards Harnessing Large Language Models as Autonomous Agents for Semantic Triple Extraction from Unstructured Text. 2024. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-37 47/text2kg_paper1.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  11. Saleh, A.O.M.; Tur, G.; Saygin, Y. SG-RAG: Multi-Hop Question Answering with Large Language Models Through Knowledge Graphs. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Natural Language and Speech Processing (ICNLSP), Trento, NJ, USA, 19-20 October 2024; pp. 439-448.
  12. Trinh, T.; Dao, A.; Nhung, H.T.H.; Son, H.T. VieMedKG: Knowledge Graph and Benchmark for Traditional Vietnamese Medicine. bioRxiv 2024.
  13. Li, Y.; Wang, Z.; Liu, Y.; Wang, L.; Liu, L.; Zhou, L. KARGEN: Knowledge-enhanced Automated Radiology Report Generation Using Large Language Models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2409.05370. · arXiv
  14. Ren, X.; Tang, J.; Yin, D.; Chawla, N.; Huang, C. A Survey of Large Language Models for Graphs. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, Barcelona, Spain, 25-29 August 2024; pp. 6616-6626.
  15. Sun, Y.; Xin, H.; Sun, K.; Xu, Y.E.; Yang, X.; Dong, X.L.; Tang, N.; Chen, L. Are Large Language Models a Good Replacement of Taxonomies? Proc. VLDB Endow. 2024, 17, 2919-2932. [CrossRef] · DOI
  16. Venkatakrishnan, R.; Tanyildizi, E.; Canbaz, M.A. Semantic interlinking of Immigration Data using LLMs for Knowledge Graph Construction. In Proceedings of the Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, Singapore, 13-17 May 2024; pp. 605-608. [CrossRef] · DOI
  17. Huang, Y.; Zeng, G. RD-P: A Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Prompter with Knowledge Graphs for LLMs. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, New York, NY, USA, 21-25 October 2024; pp. 942-952. [CrossRef] · DOI
  18. Colombo, A. Leveraging Knowledge Graphs and LLMs to Support and Monitor Legislative Systems. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Boise, ID, USA, 21-25 October 2024; pp. 5443-5446. [CrossRef] · DOI
  19. Wei, W.; Ren, X.; Tang, J.; Wang, Q.; Su, L.; Cheng, S.; Wang, J.; Yin, D.; Huang, C. LLMRec: Large Language Models with Graph Augmentation for Recommendation. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining, Merida, Mexico, 4-8 March 2024; pp. 806-815. [CrossRef] · DOI
  20. Dong, X.L. Generations of Knowledge Graphs: The Crazy Ideas and the Business Impact. Proc. VLDB Endow. 2023, 16, 4130-4137. [CrossRef] · DOI
  21. Wu, Q.; Wang, Y. Research on Intelligent Question-Answering Systems Based on Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs. In Proceedings of the 2023 16th International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Design (ISCID), Hangzhou, China, 16-17 December 2023; pp. 161-164.
  22. Fieblinger, R.; Alam, M.T.; Rastogi, N. Actionable Cyber Threat Intelligence Using Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW), Vienna, Austria, 8-12 July 2024; pp. 100-111.
  23. Vizcarra, J.; Haruta, S.; Kurokawa, M. Representing the Interaction between Users and Products via LLM-assisted Knowledge Graph Construction. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 18th International Conference on Semantic Computing (ICSC), Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 5-7 February 2024; pp. 231-232.
  24. Kosten, C.; Cudré-Mauroux, P.; Stockinger, K. Spider4SPARQL: A Complex Benchmark for Evaluating Knowledge Graph Question Answering Systems. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (BigData), Sorrento, Italy, 15-18 December 2023; pp. 5272-5281. [CrossRef] · DOI
  25. Taffa, T.A.; Usbeck, R. Leveraging LLMs in Scholarly Knowledge Graph Question Answering. arXiv 2023, arXiv:2311.09841. · arXiv
  26. Ding, Z.; Cai, H.; Wu, J.; Ma, Y.; Liao, R.; Xiong, B.; Tresp, V. zrLLM: Zero-Shot Relational Learning on Temporal Knowledge Graphs with Large Language Models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2311.10112. · arXiv
  27. Chen, L.; Xu, J.; Wu, T.; Liu, J. Information Extraction of Aviation Accident Causation Knowledge Graph: An LLM-Based Approach. Electronics 2024, 13, 3936. [CrossRef] · DOI
  28. Braşoveanu, A.M.P.; Nixon, L.J.B.; Weichselbraun, A.; Scharl, A. Framing Few-Shot Knowledge Graph Completion with Large Language Models. Electronics 2024, 13, 3936.
  29. Jiang, L.; Yan, X.; Usbeck, R. A Structure and Content Prompt-Based Method for Knowledge Graph Question Answering over Scholarly Data. 2023. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3592/paper3.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  30. Mohanty, A. EduEmbedd-A Knowledge Graph Embedding for Education. 2023. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-35 32/paper1.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  31. Pliukhin, D.; Radyush, D.; Kovriguina, L.; Mouromtsev, D. Improving Subgraph Extraction Algorithms for One-Shot SPARQL Query Generation with Large Language Models. 2024. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3592/paper6.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  32. Vasisht, K.; Ganesan, B.; Kumar, V.; Bhatnagar, V. Infusing Knowledge into Large Language Models with Contextual Prompts. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Natural Language Processing (ICON), Goa, India, 14-17 December 2023;
  33. Liu, S.; Fang, Y. Use Large Language Models for Named Entity Disambiguation in Academic Knowledge Graphs; Atlantis Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2023; pp. 681-691.
  34. de Paiva, V.; Gao, Q.; Kovalev, P.; Moss, L.S. Extracting Mathematical Concepts with Large Language Models. 2023. Available online: https://cicm-conference.org/2023/mathui/mathuiPubs/CICM_2023_paper_8826.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  35. Thießen, F.; D'Souza, J.; Stocker, M. Probing Large Language Models for Scientific Synonyms. 2023. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3510/paper_nlp_2.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  36. Wang, F.; Shi, D.; Aguilar, J.; Cui, X.; Jiang, J.; Shen, L.; Li, M. LLM-KGMQA: Large Language Model-Augmented Multi- Hop Question-Answering System Based on Knowledge Graph in Medical Field. 2024. ISSN: 2693-5015. Available online: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-4721418/v1 (accessed on 1 March 2025). [CrossRef] · DOI
  37. Yang, J. Integrated Application of LLM Model and Knowledge Graph in Medical Text Mining and Knowledge Extraction. Soc. Med. Health Manag. 2024, 5, 56-62.
  38. Li, Q.; Chen, Z.; Ji, C.; Jiang, S.; Li, J. LLM-based Multi-Level Knowledge Generation for Few-shot Knowledge Graph Completion. In Proceedings of the Thirty-ThirdInternational Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Jeju, Republic of Korea, 3-9 August 2024; pp. 2135-2143. [CrossRef] · DOI
  39. Laurenzi, E.; Mathys, A.; Martin, A. An LLM-Aided Enterprise Knowledge Graph (EKG) Engineering Process. Proc. AAAI Symp. Ser. 2024, 3, 148-156. [CrossRef] · DOI
  40. Gupta, T.K.; Goel, T.; Verma, I.; Dey, L.; Bhardwaj, S. Knowledge Graph Aided LLM Based ESG Question-Answering from News. 2024. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-3753/paper6.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  41. Ghanem, H.; Cruz, C. Fine-Tuning vs. Prompting: Evaluating the Knowledge Graph Construction with LLMs. 2024. Available online: https://hal.science/hal-04862235/ (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  42. Son, J.; Seonwoo, Y.; Yoon, S.; Thorne, J.; Oh, A. Multi-hop Database Reasoning with Virtual Knowledge Graph. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models (KaLLM 2024), Bangkok, Thailand, 15 August 2024;
  43. Biswas, R., Kaffee, L.A., Agarwal, O., Minervini, P., Singh, S., de Melo, G., Eds.; Association for Computational Linguistics: Bangkok, Thailand, 2024; pp. 1-11. [CrossRef] · DOI
  44. Dernbach, S.; Agarwal, K.; Zuniga, A.; Henry, M.; Choudhury, S. GLaM: Fine-Tuning Large Language Models for Domain Knowledge Graph Alignment via Neighborhood Partitioning and Generative Subgraph Encoding. Proc. AAAI Symp. Ser. 2024, 3, 82-89. [CrossRef] · DOI · Paper page
  45. Reitemeyer, B.; Fill, H.G. Leveraging LLMs in Semantic Mapping for Knowledge Graph-Based Automated Enterprise Model Generation; Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.: Berlin, Germany, 2024. [CrossRef] · DOI
  46. Kollegger, A.B.; Erdl, A.; Hunger, M. Knowledge Graph Builder-Constructing a Graph from Arbitrary Text Using an LLM. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Symposium on Graph Drawing and Network Visualization (GD 2024), Vienna, Austria, 18-20 September 2024;
  47. Felsner, S., Klein, K., Eds.; Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik: Dagstuhl, Germany, 2024; Volume 320, pp. 61:1-61:2.
  48. Li, V.X.; Tan, Y. Dynamic Knowledge Graph Asset Pricing. 2024. Available online: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm? abstract_id=4841921 (accessed on 1 March 2025). [CrossRef] · DOI
  49. Tufek, N.; Saissre, A.; Just, V.P.; Ekaputra, F.J.; Sabou, M.; Hanbury, A. Validating Semantic Artifacts with Large Language Models. In European Semantic Web Conference; Springer Nature: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 92-101. [CrossRef] · DOI
  50. Gan, L.; Blum, M.; Dessí, D.; Mathiak, B.; Schenkel, R.; Dietze, S. Hidden Entity Detection from GitHub Leveraging Large Language Models. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2501.04455. · arXiv
  51. Martin, A.; Witschel, H.F.; Mandl, M.; Stockhecke, M. Semantic Verification in Large Language Model-based Retrieval Augmented Generation. Proc. AAAI Symp. Ser. 2024, 3, 188-192. [CrossRef] · DOI
  52. Chu, J.M.; Lo, H.C.; Hsiang, J.; Cho, C.C. Patent Response System Optimised for Faithfulness: Procedural Knowledge Embodiment with Knowledge Graph and Retrieval Augmented Generation. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Towards Knowledgeable Language Models (KnowLLM 2024), Bangkok, Thailand, 16 August 2024;
  53. Li, S., Li, M., Zhang, M.J., Choi, E., Geva, M., Hase, P., Ji, H., Eds.; Association for Computational Linguistics: Bangkok, Thailand, 2024; pp. 146-155. [CrossRef] · DOI
  54. Dobriy, D. Employing RAG to Create a Conference Knowledge Graph from Text. 2024. Available online: https://ceur-ws.org/ Vol-3747/text2kg_paper4.pdf (accessed on 1 March 2025).
  55. Camboim de Sá, J.; Anastasiou, D.; Da Silveira, M.; Pruski, C. Socio-cultural adapted chatbots: Harnessing Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models for enhanced context awarenes. In Proceedings of the 1st Worskhop on Towards Ethical and Inclusive Conversational AI: Language Attitudes, Linguistic Diversity, and Language Rights (TEICAI 2024), St. Julian's, Malta, 22 March 2024;
  56. Hosseini-Kivanani, N., Höhn, S., Anastasiou, D., Migge, B., Soltan, A., Dippold, D., Kamlovskaya, E., Philippy, F., Eds.; Association for Computational Linguistics: St Julians, Malta, 2024; pp. 21-27.
  57. Iga, V.I.R.; Silaghi, G.C. LLMs for Knowledge-Graphs Enhanced Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems: Challenges and Opportunities. In Proceedings of the Advanced Information Systems Engineering Workshops, Limassol, Cyprus, 3-7 June 2024;
  58. Almeida, J.P.A., Di Ciccio, C., Kalloniatis, C., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2024; pp. 168-179. [CrossRef] · DOI
  59. Zhao, Q.; Qian, H.; Liu, Z.; Zhang, G.D.; Gu, L. Breaking the Barrier: Utilizing Large Language Models for Industrial Recommendation Systems through an Inferential Knowledge Graph. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Boise, ID, USA, 21-25 October 2024; pp. 5086-5093. [CrossRef] · DOI
  60. Zhang, Y.; Chen, Z.; Guo, L.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, W.; Chen, H. Making Large Language Models Perform Better in Knowledge Graph Completion. In Proceedings of the 32nd ACM International Conference on Multimedia, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, 28 October-1 November 2024; pp. 233-242. [CrossRef] · DOI
  61. Liu, L.; Wang, Z.; Bai, J.; Song, Y.; Tong, H. New Frontiers of Knowledge Graph Reasoning: Recent Advances and Future Trends. In Proceedings of the Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2024, Singapore, 13-17 May 2024; pp. 1294-1297. [CrossRef] · DOI
  62. Wu, L.I.; Su, Y.; Li, G. Zero-Shot Construction of Chinese Medical Knowledge Graph with GPT-3.5-turbo and GPT-4. ACM Trans. Manag. Inf. Syst. 2024, 16, 3657305. [CrossRef] · DOI
  63. Bui, T.; Tran, O.; Nguyen, P.; Ho, B.; Nguyen, L.; Bui, T.; Quan, T. Cross-Data Knowledge Graph Construction for LLM-enabled Educational Question-Answering System: A Case Study at HCMUT. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM Workshop on AI-Powered Q&A Systems for Multimedia, Phuket, Thailand, 14 June 2024; pp. 36-43. [CrossRef] · DOI
  64. Jiang, Y.; Yao, J.; Li, F.; Zhang, Y. Research on Engineering Management Question-answering System in the Communication Industry Based on Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs. In Proceedings of the 2024 7th International Conference on Machine Vision and Applications, Singapore, 12-14 March 2024; pp. 100-105. [CrossRef] · DOI
  65. Le, D.; Zhao, K.; Wang, M.; Wu, Y. GraphLingo: Domain Knowledge Exploration by Synchronizing Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 40th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE), Utrecht, The Netherlands, 13-16 May 2024; pp. 5477-5480.
  66. Li, D.; Xu, F. The Deep Integration of Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models: Advancements, Challenges, and Future Directions. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Sensors, Electronics and Computer Engineering (ICSECE), Jinzhou, China, 29-31 August 2024; pp. 157-162. [CrossRef] · DOI
  67. Abu-Rasheed, H.; Weber, C.; Fathi, M. Knowledge Graphs as Context Sources for LLM-Based Explanations of Learning Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), Kos, Greece, 8-11 May 2024; pp. 1-5.
  68. Xu, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, H.; Lu, J.; Xiao, G. ChatTf: A Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Intelligent Q&A System for Mitigating Factuality Hallucinations in Traditional Folklore. IEEE Access 2024, 12, 162638-162650.
  69. Song, Y.; Sun, P.; Liu, H.; Li, Z.; Song, W.; Xiao, Y.; Zhou, X. Scene-Driven Multimodal Knowledge Graph Construction for Embodied AI. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024, 36, 6962-6976.
  70. Jovanović, M.; Campbell, M. Connecting AI: Merging Large Language Models and Knowledge Graph. Computer 2023, 56, 103-108.
  71. Knez, T.; Žitnik, S. Towards Using Automatically Enhanced Knowledge Graphs to Aid Temporal Relation Extraction. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Patient-Oriented Language Processing (CL4Health) @ LREC-COLING 2024;
  72. Demner-Fushman, D., Ananiadou, S., Thompson, P., Ondov, B., Eds.; ELRA and ICCL: Torino, Italy, 2024; pp. 131-136.
  73. Cao, X.; Xu, W.; Zhao, J.; Duan, Y.; Yang, X. Research on Large Language Model for Coal Mine Equipment Maintenance Based on Multi-Source Text. Appl. Sci. 2024, 14, 2946. [CrossRef] · DOI
  74. Schneider, P.; Klettner, M.; Simperl, E.; Matthes, F. A Comparative Analysis of Conversational Large Language Models in Knowledge-Based Text Generation. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2402.01495. · arXiv
  75. Xu, S.; Chen, M.; Chen, S. Enhancing Retrieval-Augmented Generation Models with Knowledge Graphs: Innovative Practices Through a Dual-Pathway Approach. In Proceedings of the Advanced Intelligent Computing Technology and Applications, Tianjin, China, 5-8 August 2024;
  76. Huang, D.S., Si, Z., Chen, W., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 398-409. [CrossRef] · DOI
  77. Huang, Q.; Wan, Z.; Xing, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, J.; Xu, X.; Lu, Q. Let's Chat to Find the APIs: Connecting Human, LLM and Knowledge Graph through AI Chain. In Proceedings of the 2023 38th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), Luxembourg, 11-15 September 2023; pp. 471-483. [CrossRef] · DOI
  78. Sequeda, J.; Allemang, D.; Jacob, B. A Benchmark to Understand the Role of Knowledge Graphs on Large Language Model's Accuracy for Question Answering on Enterprise SQL Databases. In Proceedings of the 7th Joint Workshop on Graph Data Management Experiences & Systems (GRADES) and Network Data Analytics (NDA), Santiago, Chile, 14 June 2024; pp. 1-12. [CrossRef] · DOI
  79. Fu, L.; Guan, H.; Du, K.; Lin, J.; Xia, W.; Zhang, W.; Tang, R.; Wang, Y.; Yu, Y. SINKT: A Structure-Aware Inductive Knowledge Tracing Model with Large Language Model. In Proceedings of the 33rd ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, Boise, ID, USA, 21-25 October 2024; pp. 632-642. [CrossRef] · DOI
  80. Hu, Z.; Yang, P.; Liu, F.; Meng, Y.; Liu, X. Prompting Large Language Models with Knowledge-Injection for Knowledge-Based Visual Question Answering. Big Data Min. Anal. 2024, 7, 843-857.
  81. Agrawal, G.; Pal, K.; Deng, Y.; Liu, H.; Chen, Y.C. CyberQ: Generating Questions and Answers for Cybersecurity Education Using Knowledge Graph-Augmented LLMs. Proc. AAAI Conf. Artif. Intell. 2024, 38, 23164-23172. [CrossRef] · DOI
  82. Hertling, S.; Paulheim, H. OLaLa: Ontology Matching with Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 12th Knowledge Capture Conference 2023, Pensacola, FL, USA, 5-7 December 2023; pp. 131-139. [CrossRef] · DOI
  83. Cadeddu, A.; Chessa, A.; De Leo, V.; Fenu, G.; Motta, E.; Osborne, F.; Reforgiato Recupero, D.; Salatino, A.; Secchi, L. Optimizing Tourism Accommodation Offers by Integrating Language Models and Knowledge Graph Technologies. Information 2024, 15, 398.
  84. Hello, N.; Di Lorenzo, P.; Strinati, E.C. Semantic Communication Enhanced by Knowledge Graph Representation Learning. In Proceedings of the 2024 IEEE 25th International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), Lucca, Italy, 10-13 September 2024; pp. 876-880.
  85. Nguyen, D.A.K.; Kha, S.; Le, T.V. HybridGCN: An Integrative Model for Scalable Recommender Systems with Knowledge Graph and Graph Neural Networks. Int. J. Adv. Comput. Sci. Appl. 2024, 15, 1327.
  86. Zhao, J.; Ma, Z.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, X.; Liu, Q.; Zhang, C. Self-consistency, Extract and Rectify: Knowledge Graph Enhance Large Language Model for Electric Power Question Answering. In Proceedings of the Advanced Intelligent Computing Technology and Applications, Tianjin, China, 5-8 August 2024;
  87. Huang, D.S., Pan, Y., Guo, J., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2024; pp. 493-504. [CrossRef] · DOI
  88. Wu, L.I.; Li, G. Zero-Shot Construction of Chinese Medical Knowledge Graph with ChatGPT. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Conference on Medical Artificial Intelligence (MedAI), Beijing, China, 18-19 November 2023; pp. 278-283. [CrossRef] · DOI
  89. Su, Y.; Liao, D.; Xing, Z.; Huang, Q.; Xie, M.; Lu, Q.; Xu, X. Enhancing Exploratory Testing by Large Language Model and Knowledge Graph. In Proceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, 14-20 April 2024; pp. 1-12. [CrossRef] · DOI
  90. Jin, B.; Liu, G.; Han, C.; Jiang, M.; Ji, H.; Han, J. Large Language Models on Graphs: A Comprehensive Survey. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2024, 36, 8622-8642.
  91. Procko, T.T.; Elvira, T.; Ochoa, O. GPT-4: A Stochastic Parrot or Ontological Craftsman? Discovering Implicit Knowledge Structures in Large Language Models. In Proceedings of the 2023 Fifth International Conference on Transdisciplinary AI (TransAI), Laguna Hills, CA, USA, 25-27 September 2023; pp. 147-154. [CrossRef] · DOI
  92. Sun, Y.; Yang, W.; Liu, Y. The Application of Constructing Knowledge Graph of Oral Historical Archives Resources Based on LLM-RAG. In Proceedings of the 2024 8th International Conference on Information System and Data Mining, New York, NY, USA, 24-26 June 2024; pp. 142-149. [CrossRef] · DOI
  93. Chen, Y.; Cui, S.; Huang, K.; Wang, S.; Tang, C.; Liu, T.; Fang, B. Improving Adaptive Knowledge Graph Construction via Large Language Models with Multiple Views. In Proceedings of the Knowledge Graph and Semantic Computing: Knowledge Graph Empowers Artificial General Intelligence, Shenyang, China, 24-27 August 2023;
  94. Wang, H., Han, X., Liu, M., Cheng, G., Liu, Y., Zhang, N., Eds.; Springer Nature: Singapore, 2023; pp. 273-284. [CrossRef] · DOI
  95. Khorashadizadeh, H.; Amara, F.Z.; Ezzabady, M.; Ieng, F.; Tiwari, S.; Mihindukulasooriya, N.; Groppe, J.; Sahri, S.; Benamara, F.; Groppe, S. Research Trends for the Interplay between Large Language Models and Knowledge Graphs. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2406.08223. 100. · arXiv
  96. Dehal, R.S.; Sharma, M.; de Souza Santos, R. Exposing Algorithmic Discrimination and Its Consequences in Modern Society: Insights from a Scoping Study. In Proceedings of the 46th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society, New York, NY, USA, 14-20 April 2024; pp. 69-73. [CrossRef] 101. Peng, B.; Zhu, Y.; Liu, Y.; Bo, X.; Shi, H.; Hong, C.; Zhang, Y.; Tang, S. Graph Retrieval-Augmented Generation: A Survey. arXiv 2024, arXiv:2408.08921. 102. Guo, D.; Ren, S.; Lu, S.; Feng, Z.; Tang, D.; Liu, S.; Zhou, L.; Duan, N.; Svyatkovskiy, A.; Fu, S.; et al. GraphCodeBERT: Pre-training Code Representations with Data Flow. arXiv 2021, arXiv:2009.08366. 103. · DOI
  97. Andrus, B.R.; Nasiri, Y.; Cui, S.; Cullen, B.; Fulda, N. Enhanced Story Comprehension for Large Language Models through Dynamic Document-Based Knowledge Graphs. Proc. Aaai Conf. Artif. Intell. 2022, 36, 10436-10444.
  98. CrossRef · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dehal, R. S., Sharma, M., & Rajabi, E.
Affiliations
Cape Breton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Rajabi, Enayat
Venue
Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-04-21
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
38
ISSN
2504-4990 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4409634738
Cited by
41
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 31 · 2025: 10
FWCI
16.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
NSERC (Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council) Discovery Grant (RGPIN-2020-05869)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Advanced Graph Neural Networks
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Semantic Web and Ontologies
Keywords
knowledge graphs, large language models, knowledge graph construction, entity recognition, relation extraction, schema generation, hallucination mitigation, explainable AI, interpretability, domain adaptation, bias and fairness, medical applications, financial applications, industrial automation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review