Cited by 28Microgrid Control and OptimizationSmart Grid Energy ManagementElectric Power System Optimization

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Scheduling of Energy Storage System in Microgrids

Open access
Jung, Sang-Woo, An, Yoon-Young, Suh, BeomKyu, Park, YongBeom, Kim, Jian, Kim, Ki-Il·2025·Mathematics

Abstract

Efficient scheduling of Energy Storage Systems (ESS) within microgrids has emerged as a critical issue to ensure energy cost reduction, peak shaving, and battery health management. For ESS scheduling, both single-agent and multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approaches have been explored. However, the former has suffered from scalability to include multiple objectives while the latter lacks comprehensive consideration of diverse user objectives. To defeat the above issues, in this paper, we propose a new DRL-based scheduling algorithm using a multi-agent proximal policy optimization (MAPPO) framework that is combined with Pareto optimization. The proposed model employs two independent agents: one is to minimize electricity costs and the other does charge/discharge switching frequency to account for battery degradation. The candidate actions generated by the agents are evaluated through Pareto dominance, and the final action is selected via scalarization-reflecting operator-defined preferences. The simulation experiments were conducted using real industrial building load and photovoltaic (PV) generation data under realistic South Korean electricity tariff structures. The comparative evaluations against baseline DRL algorithms (TD3, SAC, PPO) demonstrate that the proposed MAPPO method significantly reduces electricity costs while minimizing battery-switching events. Furthermore, the results highlight that the proposed method achieves a balanced improvement in both economic efficiency and battery longevity, making it highly applicable to real-world dynamic microgrid environments. Specifically, the proposed MAPPO-based scheduling achieved a total electricity cost reduction of 14.68% compared to the No-ESS case and achieved 3.56% greater cost savings than other baseline reinforcement learning algorithms.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/math13121999

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Still being checked.

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Impram, 2020, Challenges of renewable energy penetration on power system flexibility: A survey, Energy Strategy Rev., 31, 100539, 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100539 · DOI
  2. Eltigani, 2015, Challenges of integrating renewable energy sources to smart grids: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 52, 770, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.140 · DOI
  3. Sinsel, 2020, Challenges and solution technologies for the integration of variable renewable energy sources—A review, Renew. Energy, 145, 2271, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.147 · DOI
  4. Liu, 2016, Microgrids for enhancing the power grid resilience in extreme conditions, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 8, 589
  5. Oliveira, D.Q. (2021). A critical review of energy storage technologies for microgrids. Energy Syst., 1–30. · DOI
  6. Shahzad, S. (2023). Possibilities, challenges, and future opportunities of microgrids: A review. Sustainability, 15. · DOI
  7. Allwyn, 2023, A comprehensive review on energy management strategy of microgrids, Energy Rep., 9, 5565, 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.360 · DOI
  8. Chaudhary, G. (2021). Review of energy storage and energy management system control strategies in microgrids. Energies, 14. · DOI
  9. Khan, 2019, Optimal energy management and control aspects of distributed microgrid using multi-agent systems, Sustain. Cities Soc., 44, 855, 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.009 · DOI
  10. Minchala, 2015, A review of optimal control techniques applied to the energy management and control of microgrids, Procedia Comput. Sci., 52, 780, 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.133 · DOI
  11. Jang, M.J. (2022). Optimization of ESS scheduling for cost reduction in commercial and industry customers in Korea. Sustainability, 14. · DOI
  12. Kim, 2017, Operation scheduling for an energy storage system considering reliability and aging, Energy, 141, 389, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.091 · DOI
  13. Raghavan, 2020, Optimization of day-ahead energy storage system scheduling in microgrid using genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization, IEEE Access, 8, 173068, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025673 · DOI
  14. Shakya, 2023, Reinforcement learning algorithms: A brief survey, Expert Syst. Appl., 231, 120495, 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120495 · DOI
  15. Ojand, 2021, Q-learning-based model predictive control for energy management in residential aggregator, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 19, 70, 10.1109/TASE.2021.3091334 · DOI
  16. Ji, Y. (2019). Real-time energy management of a microgrid using deep reinforcement learning. Energies, 12. · DOI
  17. Gorostiza, 2020, Deep reinforcement learning-based controller for SOC management of multi-electrical energy storage system, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 11, 5039, 10.1109/TSG.2020.2996274 · DOI
  18. Fan, L. (2021). Optimal scheduling of microgrid based on deep deterministic policy gradient and transfer learning. Energies, 14. · DOI
  19. Li, 2020, Real-time residential demand response, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 11, 4144, 10.1109/TSG.2020.2978061 · DOI
  20. Kang, 2024, Reinforcement learning-based optimal scheduling model of battery energy storage system at the building level, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 190, 114054, 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114054 · DOI
  21. Xu, 2024, An optimal solutions-guided deep reinforcement learning approach for online energy storage control, Appl. Energy, 361, 122915, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122915 · DOI
  22. Pinciroli, 2023, Optimal operation and maintenance of energy storage systems in grid-connected microgrids by deep reinforcement learning, Appl. Energy, 352, 121947, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121947 · DOI
  23. Thilo, 2023, Minimizing energy cost in pv battery storage systems using reinforcement learning, IEEE Access, 11, 39855, 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3267978 · DOI
  24. Zheng, 2024, Optimal scheduling strategy of electricity and thermal energy storage based on soft actor-critic reinforcement learning approach, J. Energy Storage, 92, 112084, 10.1016/j.est.2024.112084 · DOI
  25. Farzin, 2016, A stochastic multi-objective framework for optimal scheduling of energy storage systems in microgrids, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 8, 117, 10.1109/TSG.2016.2598678 · DOI
  26. Geng, S. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of a microgrid considering the uncertainty of supply and demand. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
  27. Wei, 2024, A multi-objective fuzzy optimization model for multi-type aircraft flight scheduling problem, Transport, 39, 313, 10.3846/transport.2024.20536 · DOI
  28. Zhou, 2022, Reinforcement learning-based scheduling strategy for energy storage in microgrid, J. Energy Storage, 51, 104379, 10.1016/j.est.2022.104379 · DOI
  29. Mao, 2025, A short-term power prediction method based on numerical weather prediction correction and the fusion of adaptive spatiotemporal graph feature information for wind farm cluster, Expert Syst. Appl., 274, 126979, 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126979 · DOI
  30. Zhang, T., Zhao, W., He, Q., and Xu, J. (2025). Optimization of Microgrid Dispatching by Integrating Photovoltaic Power Generation Forecast. Sustainability, 17. · DOI
  31. Hassan, 2022, A comprehensive review of battery state of charge estimation techniques, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 54, 102801
  32. Li, 2023, Accelerated aging of lithium-ion batteries: Bridging battery aging analysis and operational lifetime prediction, Sci. Bull., 68, 3055, 10.1016/j.scib.2023.10.029 · DOI
  33. Park, W.Y. (2023). Korean Power System Challenges and Opportunities, Priorities for Swift and Successful Clean Energy Deployment at Scale. · DOI
  34. Celik, B. (2022). Prediction of battery cycle life using early-cycle data, machine learning and data management. Batteries, 8. · DOI
  35. Severson, 2019, Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation, Nat. Energy, 4, 383, 10.1038/s41560-019-0356-8 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Fanoro, M., Mladen, B., and Saurabh, S. (2022). A review of the impact of battery degradation on energy management systems with a special emphasis on electric vehicles. Energies, 15. · DOI
  37. Schulman, J., Levine, S., Abbeel, P., Jordan, M., and Moritz, P. (2015, January 6–11). Trust Region Policy Optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 28

Metadata

Authors
Jung, S.-W., An, Y.-Y., Suh, B., Park, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, K.-I.
Affiliations
  • Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34143, Republic of Korea
  • Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
  • Chungnam National University (KR)
Corresponding author
Kim, Ki-Il
Venue
Mathematics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2025-06-17
Volume
13
Issue
12
Pages
1999
ISSN
2227-7390 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4411369138
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 6
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mathematics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2022-00165225, RS-2022-II221200)
  • Institute for Information and communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (RS-2022-00165225, RS-2022-II221200)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
Keywords
energy storage scheduling, microgrids, multi-agent deep reinforcement learning, proximal policy optimization, multi-objective optimization, battery degradation, electricity cost reduction, photovoltaic generation, building loads, electricity tariffs, peak shaving

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Scheduling of Energy Storage System in Microgrids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/math13121999
The paper
Jung, S.-W., An, Y.-Y., Suh, B., Park, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, K.-I. (2025). Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Scheduling of Energy Storage System in Microgrids. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13121999