The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Scheduling of Energy Storage System in Microgrids
Open accessAbstract
Efficient scheduling of Energy Storage Systems (ESS) within microgrids has emerged as a critical issue to ensure energy cost reduction, peak shaving, and battery health management. For ESS scheduling, both single-agent and multi-agent deep reinforcement learning (DRL) approaches have been explored. However, the former has suffered from scalability to include multiple objectives while the latter lacks comprehensive consideration of diverse user objectives. To defeat the above issues, in this paper, we propose a new DRL-based scheduling algorithm using a multi-agent proximal policy optimization (MAPPO) framework that is combined with Pareto optimization. The proposed model employs two independent agents: one is to minimize electricity costs and the other does charge/discharge switching frequency to account for battery degradation. The candidate actions generated by the agents are evaluated through Pareto dominance, and the final action is selected via scalarization-reflecting operator-defined preferences. The simulation experiments were conducted using real industrial building load and photovoltaic (PV) generation data under realistic South Korean electricity tariff structures. The comparative evaluations against baseline DRL algorithms (TD3, SAC, PPO) demonstrate that the proposed MAPPO method significantly reduces electricity costs while minimizing battery-switching events. Furthermore, the results highlight that the proposed method achieves a balanced improvement in both economic efficiency and battery longevity, making it highly applicable to real-world dynamic microgrid environments. Specifically, the proposed MAPPO-based scheduling achieved a total electricity cost reduction of 14.68% compared to the No-ESS case and achieved 3.56% greater cost savings than other baseline reinforcement learning algorithms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In multi-agent settings, fairness indices emerge as critical indicators of equitable resource distribution among agents participating in shared storage or demand response programs [22].”
From Explainable AI and Multi-Agent Systems for Energy Management in IoT-Edge Environments: A State of the Art Review (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
In the citing paper
“Consequently, these agents are typically deployed as distributed software containers on Edge nodes (e.g., EV chargers, home gateways), while the training or coordination of global value functions is often synchronized via a federated Cloud aggregator to ensure system-wide stability [22].”
From Explainable AI and Multi-Agent Systems for Energy Management in IoT-Edge Environments: A State of the Art Review (2026) · cites this paper as [22]
Citations
Cites
Still being checked.
Research works printed but not linked: 37
- Impram, 2020, Challenges of renewable energy penetration on power system flexibility: A survey, Energy Strategy Rev., 31, 100539, 10.1016/j.esr.2020.100539 · DOI
- Eltigani, 2015, Challenges of integrating renewable energy sources to smart grids: A review, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 52, 770, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.140 · DOI
- Sinsel, 2020, Challenges and solution technologies for the integration of variable renewable energy sources—A review, Renew. Energy, 145, 2271, 10.1016/j.renene.2019.06.147 · DOI
- Liu, 2016, Microgrids for enhancing the power grid resilience in extreme conditions, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 8, 589
- Oliveira, D.Q. (2021). A critical review of energy storage technologies for microgrids. Energy Syst., 1–30. · DOI
- Shahzad, S. (2023). Possibilities, challenges, and future opportunities of microgrids: A review. Sustainability, 15. · DOI
- Allwyn, 2023, A comprehensive review on energy management strategy of microgrids, Energy Rep., 9, 5565, 10.1016/j.egyr.2023.04.360 · DOI
- Chaudhary, G. (2021). Review of energy storage and energy management system control strategies in microgrids. Energies, 14. · DOI
- Khan, 2019, Optimal energy management and control aspects of distributed microgrid using multi-agent systems, Sustain. Cities Soc., 44, 855, 10.1016/j.scs.2018.11.009 · DOI
- Minchala, 2015, A review of optimal control techniques applied to the energy management and control of microgrids, Procedia Comput. Sci., 52, 780, 10.1016/j.procs.2015.05.133 · DOI
- Jang, M.J. (2022). Optimization of ESS scheduling for cost reduction in commercial and industry customers in Korea. Sustainability, 14. · DOI
- Kim, 2017, Operation scheduling for an energy storage system considering reliability and aging, Energy, 141, 389, 10.1016/j.energy.2017.09.091 · DOI
- Raghavan, 2020, Optimization of day-ahead energy storage system scheduling in microgrid using genetic algorithm and particle swarm optimization, IEEE Access, 8, 173068, 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.3025673 · DOI
- Shakya, 2023, Reinforcement learning algorithms: A brief survey, Expert Syst. Appl., 231, 120495, 10.1016/j.eswa.2023.120495 · DOI
- Ojand, 2021, Q-learning-based model predictive control for energy management in residential aggregator, IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng., 19, 70, 10.1109/TASE.2021.3091334 · DOI
- Ji, Y. (2019). Real-time energy management of a microgrid using deep reinforcement learning. Energies, 12. · DOI
- Gorostiza, 2020, Deep reinforcement learning-based controller for SOC management of multi-electrical energy storage system, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 11, 5039, 10.1109/TSG.2020.2996274 · DOI
- Fan, L. (2021). Optimal scheduling of microgrid based on deep deterministic policy gradient and transfer learning. Energies, 14. · DOI
- Li, 2020, Real-time residential demand response, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 11, 4144, 10.1109/TSG.2020.2978061 · DOI
- Kang, 2024, Reinforcement learning-based optimal scheduling model of battery energy storage system at the building level, Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., 190, 114054, 10.1016/j.rser.2023.114054 · DOI
- Xu, 2024, An optimal solutions-guided deep reinforcement learning approach for online energy storage control, Appl. Energy, 361, 122915, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2024.122915 · DOI
- Pinciroli, 2023, Optimal operation and maintenance of energy storage systems in grid-connected microgrids by deep reinforcement learning, Appl. Energy, 352, 121947, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2023.121947 · DOI
- Thilo, 2023, Minimizing energy cost in pv battery storage systems using reinforcement learning, IEEE Access, 11, 39855, 10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3267978 · DOI
- Zheng, 2024, Optimal scheduling strategy of electricity and thermal energy storage based on soft actor-critic reinforcement learning approach, J. Energy Storage, 92, 112084, 10.1016/j.est.2024.112084 · DOI
- Farzin, 2016, A stochastic multi-objective framework for optimal scheduling of energy storage systems in microgrids, IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, 8, 117, 10.1109/TSG.2016.2598678 · DOI
- Geng, S. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of a microgrid considering the uncertainty of supply and demand. Sustainability, 13. · DOI
- Wei, 2024, A multi-objective fuzzy optimization model for multi-type aircraft flight scheduling problem, Transport, 39, 313, 10.3846/transport.2024.20536 · DOI
- Zhou, 2022, Reinforcement learning-based scheduling strategy for energy storage in microgrid, J. Energy Storage, 51, 104379, 10.1016/j.est.2022.104379 · DOI
- Mao, 2025, A short-term power prediction method based on numerical weather prediction correction and the fusion of adaptive spatiotemporal graph feature information for wind farm cluster, Expert Syst. Appl., 274, 126979, 10.1016/j.eswa.2025.126979 · DOI
- Zhang, T., Zhao, W., He, Q., and Xu, J. (2025). Optimization of Microgrid Dispatching by Integrating Photovoltaic Power Generation Forecast. Sustainability, 17. · DOI
- Hassan, 2022, A comprehensive review of battery state of charge estimation techniques, Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess., 54, 102801
- Li, 2023, Accelerated aging of lithium-ion batteries: Bridging battery aging analysis and operational lifetime prediction, Sci. Bull., 68, 3055, 10.1016/j.scib.2023.10.029 · DOI
- Park, W.Y. (2023). Korean Power System Challenges and Opportunities, Priorities for Swift and Successful Clean Energy Deployment at Scale. · DOI
- Celik, B. (2022). Prediction of battery cycle life using early-cycle data, machine learning and data management. Batteries, 8. · DOI
- Severson, 2019, Data-driven prediction of battery cycle life before capacity degradation, Nat. Energy, 4, 383, 10.1038/s41560-019-0356-8 · DOI · Paper page
- Fanoro, M., Mladen, B., and Saurabh, S. (2022). A review of the impact of battery degradation on energy management systems with a special emphasis on electric vehicles. Energies, 15. · DOI
- Schulman, J., Levine, S., Abbeel, P., Jordan, M., and Moritz, P. (2015, January 6–11). Trust Region Policy Optimization. Proceedings of the International Conference on Machine Learning, Lille, France.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Álvarez-López, C., González-Briones, A., & Li, T. (2026) · Electronics · doi:10.3390/electronics15020385 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Jung, S.-W., An, Y.-Y., Suh, B., Park, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, K.-I.
- Affiliations
- Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Chungnam National University, 99 Daehak-ro, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 34143, Republic of Korea
- Electronics and Telecommunications Research Institute (KR)
- Chungnam National University (KR)
- Corresponding author
- Kim, Ki-Il
- Venue
- Mathematics
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2025-06-17
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1999
- ISSN
- 2227-7390 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4411369138
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 22 · 2025: 6
- FWCI
- 10.28
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Mathematics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2022-00165225, RS-2022-II221200)
- Institute for Information and communications Technology Planning and Evaluation (RS-2022-00165225, RS-2022-II221200)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Microgrid Control and Optimization
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Smart Grid Energy Management
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electric Power System Optimization
- Keywords
- energy storage scheduling, microgrids, multi-agent deep reinforcement learning, proximal policy optimization, multi-objective optimization, battery degradation, electricity cost reduction, photovoltaic generation, building loads, electricity tariffs, peak shaving
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Scheduling of Energy Storage System in Microgrids. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3390/math13121999
- The paper
- Jung, S.-W., An, Y.-Y., Suh, B., Park, Y., Kim, J., & Kim, K.-I. (2025). Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning for Scheduling of Energy Storage System in Microgrids. Mathematics. https://doi.org/10.3390/math13121999