Cited by 13Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsElectroconvulsive Therapy StudiesRestraint-Related Deaths

Mechanical Restraint in Inpatient Psychiatric Unit: Prevalence and Associated Clinical Variables

Open access
Aguglia, Andrea, Corsini, Giovanni Pietro, Berardelli, Isabella, Berti, Andrea, Conio, Benedetta, Garbarino, Nicolò, Gnecco, Giovanni Battista, Magni, Caterina +5 more·2023·Medicina

Abstract

Background and Objectives: mechanical restraint (MR) is a controversial issue in emergency psychiatry and should be better studied to implement other alternative therapeutic interventions. The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of MR in an Italian psychiatric unit and identify the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics as well as the pharmacological pattern associated with MR. Materials and Methods: all subjects (N = 799) consecutively admitted to an Italian psychiatric inpatient unit were recruited. Several sociodemographic and clinical characteristics were recorded. Results: The prevalence of MR was 14.1%. Males, a younger age, and a single and migrant status were associated with the MR phenomenon. MR was more prevalent in patients affected by other diagnoses and comorbid illicit substance use, in patients with aggressive behaviors, and those that were involuntary admitted, leading significantly to hospitalization over 21 days. Furthermore, the patients that underwent MR were taking a lower number of psychiatric medications. Conclusions: Unfortunately, MR is still used in emergency psychiatry. Future research should focus on the dynamics of MR development in psychiatry, specifically considering ward- and staff-related factors that could help identify a more precise prevention and alternative intervention strategies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/medicina59101847

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Involuntary treatment is often used for people with more severe illness or with conditions such as psychosis that take a greater period of time to resolve.

    “This may be in part because involuntary treatment is often used for people with more severe illness or with conditions such as psychosis that take a greater period of time to resolve (89,118,119), although other factors such as logistical and bureaucratic issues or bed availability may also affect length of stay for involuntary patients (64,68,120).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Discussion (page not available in our copy) links involuntary admission with more severe symptoms and poor insight, and identifies psychotic disorders among factors associated with involuntary admission. It does not say that psychosis takes longer to resolve; its finding about long hospitalization concerns mechanical restraint, not the time needed to resolve psychosis. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Involuntary patients may be more likely to display aggressive behaviours.

    “A similar cycle of coercive care provision may also be evident during admission, with the available literature indicating that once a person was admitted as an involuntary patient they were more likely to be subject to use of coercive treatment modalities such as restraint and seclusion than people admitted on a voluntary basis (34,76–88), and may be more likely to display aggressive behaviours (”
  • Involuntary treatment was generally associated with longer length of stay than was voluntary care.

    “Involuntary treatment was generally associated with longer length of stay than was voluntary care (58,68,89,117–120), with the exception of one study (121).”

    From The benefits and harms of inpatient involuntary psychiatric treatment: a scoping review (2025) · cites this paper as [89]

    The Results section reports that involuntary admission and hospitalization over 21 days were each associated with mechanical restraint, but it does not compare length of stay between involuntary and voluntary patients. A search for that comparison found no passage in our copy that establishes the claimed relationship. (LLM, conf=0.76)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 49 · Cited by 13

Authors
Aguglia, A., Corsini, G. P., Berardelli, I., Berti, A., Conio, B., Garbarino, N., Gnecco, G. B., Magni, C., Venturini, E., Costanza, A., Amerio, A., Amore, M., & Serafini, G.
Affiliations
  • Ospedale Policlinico San Martino (IT)
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Sant'Andrea (IT)
  • University of Genoa (IT)
  • University of Geneva (CH)
Corresponding author
Costanza, Alessandra
Venue
Medicina
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2023-10-17
Volume
59
Issue
10
Pages
1847
ISSN
  • 1010-660X (ISSN-L)
  • 1648-9144
OpenAlex
W4387707334
Cited by
13
References
49
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 4
FWCI
3.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Medicina (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial Research Information System (University of Genoa) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Restraint-Related Deaths
Keywords
mechanical restraint, psychiatric inpatients, prevalence, sociodemographic factors, illicit drug use, aggression, involuntary admission, length of hospital stay, psychiatric medication, psychiatric emergency care, migrant patients, alternative interventions
MeSH terms
Aggression, Mental Disorders, Hospitalization, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Prevalence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review