Guts Bacterial Communities of Porcellio dilatatus: Symbionts Predominance, Functional Significance and Putative Biotechnological Potential
Open accessAbstract
Terrestrial isopods are effective herbivorous scavengers with an important ecological role in organic matter cycling. Their guts are considered to be a natural enrichment environment for lignocellulosic biomass (LCB)-degrading bacteria. The main goal of this work was to assess the structural diversity of Porcellio dilatatus gut bacterial communities using NGS technologies, and to predict their functional potential using PICRUSt2 software. Pseudomonadota, Actinomycetota, Bacillota, Cyanobacteria, Mycoplasmatota, Bacteroidota, Candidatus Patescibacteria and Chloroflexota were the most abundant phyla found in P. dilatatus gut bacterial communities. At a family level, we identified the presence of eleven common bacterial families. Functionally, the P. dilatatus gut bacterial communities exhibited enrichment in KEGG pathways related to the functional module of metabolism. With the predicted functional profile of P. dilatatus metagenomes, it was possible to envision putative symbiotic relationships between P. dilatatus gut bacterial communities and their hosts. It was also possible to foresee the presence of a well-adapted bacterial community responsible for nutrient uptake for the host and for maintaining host homeostasis. Genes encoding LCB-degrading enzymes were also predicted in all samples. Therefore, the P. dilatatus digestive tract may be considered a potential source of LCB-degrading enzymes that is not to be neglected.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Bouchon, D., Zimmer, M., & Dittmer, J. (2016) · Frontiers in Microbiology · doi:10.3389/fmicb.2016.01472 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Coelho, C., Tiago, I., & Veríssimo, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Coimbra (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Tiago, Igor
- Venue
- Microorganisms
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2022-11-11
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 2230
- ISSN
- 2076-2607 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9692603
- OpenAlex
- W4309006981
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Microorganisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- POCH—Programa Operacional Capital Humano (SFRH/BD/148270/2019, PINFRA/22184/2016, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022184, PTDC/AGR-TEC/3789/2012)
- European Social Fund (SFRH/BD/148270/2019, PINFRA/22184/2016, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022184, PTDC/AGR-TEC/3789/2012)
- MCTES (SFRH/BD/148270/2019, PINFRA/22184/2016, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022184, PTDC/AGR-TEC/3789/2012)
- FCT—Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (SFRH/BD/148270/2019, PINFRA/22184/2016, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-022184, PTDC/AGR-TEC/3789/2012)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecology › Microbial Community Ecology and Physiology
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Aquaculture disease management and microbiota
- Keywords
- Porcellio dilatatus, gut bacterial community, lignocellulose degradation, host-symbiont interactions, nutrient uptake, organic matter cycling, biotechnological potential
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review