Probiotics: If It Does Not Help It Does Not Do Any Harm. Really?
Open accessAbstract
Probiotics per definition should have beneficial effects on human health, and their consumption has tremendously increased in the last decades. In parallel, the amount of published material and claims for their beneficial efficacy soared continuously. Recently, multiple systemic reviews, meta-analyses, and expert opinions expressed criticism on their claimed effects and safety. The present review describes the dark side of the probiotics, in terms of problematic research design, incomplete reporting, lack of transparency, and under-reported safety. Highlighted are the potential virulent factors and the mode of action in the intestinal lumen, risking the physiological microbiome equilibrium. Finally, regulatory topics are discussed to lighten the heterogeneous guidelines applied worldwide. The shift in the scientific world towards a better understanding of the human microbiome, before consumption of the probiotic cargo, is highly endorsed. It is hoped that better knowledge will extend the probiotic repertoire, re-confirm efficacy or safety, establish their efficacy and substantiate their beneficial effects.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Common probiotic side effects are bloating, gas, diarrhea, constipation, nausea, thirst, headaches and migraines, and skin reactions.
“Common probiotic side effects are bloating, gas, diarrhea, constipation, nausea [235,236], thirst, headaches and migraines, and skin reactions [234].”
From The Potential Impact of Probiotics on Human Health: An Update on Their Health-Promoting Properties (2024) · cites this paper as [235]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 210 · Cited by 117
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [11]Gasbarrini G. Bonvicini F. Gramenzi A. Probiotics History Proceedings of the 8th Probiotics, Prebiotics & New Foods for Microbiota and Human Health Meeting Rome, Italy 13–15 September 2015 S116 S119
- [63]Aminov R.I. The extent and regulation of lateral gene transfer in natural microbial ecosystems Horizontal Gene Transfer in Microorganisms Francino M.P. Horizon Scientific Press Norwich, UK 2012 Chapter 6 93 100
- Authors
- Lerner, A., Shoenfeld, Y., & Matthias, T.
- Affiliations
- Technion – Israel Institute of Technology (IL)
- Tel Aviv University (IL)
- AESKU.KIPP Institute, 55234 Wendelsheim, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Lerner, Aaron
- Venue
- Microorganisms
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2019-04-11
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 104
- ISSN
- 2076-2607 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6517882
- OpenAlex
- W2937795185
- Cited by
- 117
- References
- 210
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 1.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- dx.doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Microorganisms (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Complementary and Alternative Medicine Studies
- Keywords
- probiotics, probiotic safety, probiotic efficacy, study design flaws, reporting quality, transparency, virulence factors, gut microbiota, mechanism of action, probiotic regulation, human microbiome
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review