Cited by 0Microplastics and Plastic PollutionEnvironmental Toxicology and EcotoxicologyPharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts

Aqueous Eluates of Foamed Plastic Consumer Products may Induce High Toxicity to Aquatic Biota

Open access
Blinova, Irina, Lukjanova, Aljona, Kahru, Anne, Aruoja, Villem, Heinlaan, Margit·2026·Microplastics

Abstract

Plastic pollution is a global challenge. Despite plastics being complex chemical mixtures, hazard research has focused on particulate forms and the risks of plastic additives, especially for environmental organisms, remain poorly understood. This is a significant knowledge gap considering ubiquitous organismal exposure to plastics and the associated 16,000+ additives. The aim of this study was to provide ecotoxicological characterization of aqueous eluates of foamed plastic consumer products and propose a test battery for toxicity screening. To achieve this, the hazard of eluates of six randomly selected foamed plastic products was evaluated using aquatic decomposers, autotrophs and heterotrophs (Vibrio fischeri, Raphidocelis subcapitata, Lemna minor, Thamnocephalus platyurus, Heterocypris incongruens, Daphnia magna). Alarmingly, all plastic eluates affected the organisms, though toxicity varied among materials and species. Results showed that short-term contact may underestimate plastic eluate toxicity. To increase the environmental relevance of hazard assessment of foamed plastic eluates, harmonizing leachate preparation, using natural water and avoiding (excessive) filtration of eluates should be considered. OECD/ISO assays with R. subcapitata, H. incongruens and D. magna (96 h) can be recommended as a minimal sensitive battery for effective screening of plastic eluate toxicity.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/microplastics5010049

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 32

Authors
Blinova, I., Lukjanova, A., Kahru, A., Aruoja, V., & Heinlaan, M.
Affiliations
  • National Institute of Chemical Physics and Biophysics (EE)
  • Estonian Academy of Sciences (EE)
Corresponding author
Heinlaan, Margit
Venue
Microplastics
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2026-03-06
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
49
ISSN
2673-8929 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7134059754
Cited by
0
References
32
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Microplastics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Preprints.org (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Estonian Research Council (PRG1427, PRG2595)
  • Project NAMUR+ core facility ((TT13))
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Environmental Toxicology and Ecotoxicology
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Pharmaceutical and Antibiotic Environmental Impacts
Keywords
plastic leachates, polymer additives, ecotoxicity, aquatic organisms, Vibrio fischeri, Raphidocelis subcapitata, Lemna minor, Thamnocephalus platyurus, Heterocypris incongruens, Daphnia magna, plastic pollution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review