Cited by 25Essential Oils and Antimicrobial ActivityCoconut Research and ApplicationsAntimicrobial agents and applications

In-vitro antibacterial properties of crude aqueous and n-hexane extracts of the husk of Cocos nucifera

Open access
Akinyele, Taiwo Adesola, Okoh, Omobola Oluranti, Akinpelu, David Ayinde, Okoh, Anthony Ifeanyi·2011·Molecules

Abstract

The increasing numbers of cases of antibiotic resistance among pathogenic bacteria such as Vibrio species poses a major problem to the food and aquaculture industries, as most antibiotics are no longer effective in controlling pathogenic bacteria affecting these industries. Therefore, this study was carried out to assess the antibacterial potentials of crude aqueous and n-hexane extracts of the husk of Cocos nucifera against some selected Vibrio species and other bacterial pathogens including those normally implicated in food and wound infections. The crude extracts were screened against forty-five strains of Vibrio pathogens and twenty-five other bacteria isolates made up of ten Gram positive and fifteen Gram negative bacteria. The aqueous extract was active against 17 of the tested bacterial and 37 of the Vibrio isolates; while the n-hexane extract showed antimicrobial activity against 21 of the test bacteria and 38 of the test Vibrio species. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the aqueous and n-hexane extracts against the susceptible bacteria ranged between 0.6–5.0 mg/mL and 0.3–5.0 mg/mL respectively, while the time kill study result for the aqueous extract ranged between 0.12 Log10 and 4.2 Log10 cfu/mL after 8 hours interaction in 1 × MIC and 2 × MIC. For the n-hexane extract, the log reduction ranged between 0.56 Log10 and 6.4 Log10 cfu/mL after 8 hours interaction in 1 × MIC and 2 × MIC. This study revealed the huge potential of C. nucifera extracts as alternative therapies against microbial infections.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules16032135

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Aqueous extracts of husk fiber were active against 29 of 37 Listeria isolates, while n-hexane extracts were active against 30, both at 25 mg/mL.

    “The aqueous extracts were active against 29 of 37 Listeria isolates examined, while the n-hexane extracts were active against 30 (both at 25 mg/mL).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 25

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [12]Thormar P.K. Handbook on Coconut Palm Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. New Delhi, India 1996
  2. [22]Dharmananda S. Golinuts and the uses of tannins in Chinese Medicine Proceedings of Institute for Traditional Medicine Portland, OR, USA 25 September 2003

Authors
Akinyele, T. A., Okoh, O. O., Akinpelu, D. A., & Okoh, A. I.
Affiliations
  • University of Fort Hare (ZA)
  • Obafemi Awolowo University (NG)
Corresponding author
Okoh, Anthony Ifeanyi
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2011-03-03
Volume
16
Issue
3
Pages
2135-2145
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964671984
Cited by
25
References
45
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
1.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Antimicrobial agents and applications
Keywords
Cocos nucifera, coconut husk, antibacterial activity, Vibrio, hexane extract, aqueous extract, minimum inhibitory concentration, time-kill kinetics, antibiotic alternatives, foodborne pathogens, wound infection, Gram-positive bacteria, Gram-negative bacteria
MeSH terms
Anti-Bacterial Agents, Cocos, Hexanes, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Plant Extracts, Water, In Vitro Techniques

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review