Cited by 85Edible Oils Quality and AnalysisPhytochemicals and Antioxidant ActivitiesPomegranate: compositions and health benefits

Evaluation of Phytochemical and Antioxidant Properties of 15 Italian Olea europaea L. Cultivar Leaves

Open access
Nicolì, Francesca, Negro, Carmine, Vergine, Marzia, Aprile, Alessio, Nutricati, Eliana, Sabella, Erika, Miceli, Antonio, Luvisi, Andrea +1 more·2019·Molecules

Abstract

Olive leaf extracts are of special interest due to their proven therapeutic effects. However, they are still considered a by-product of the table olive and the oil industries. In order to learn possible ways of exploiting this waste for health purposes, we investigated the phytochemical profiles and antioxidant activities in the leaves of 15 Italian Olea europaea L. cultivars grown in the same pedoclimatic conditions. The phenolic profiles and amounts of their seven representative compounds were analyzed using HPLC ESI/MS-TOF. The antioxidant activities were determined using three different antioxidant assays (DPPH, ORAC, and superoxide anion scavenging assay). Wide ranges of total phenolic content (11.39–48.62 g GAE kg−1 dry weight) and antioxidant activities (DPPH values: 8.67–29.89 µmol TE mg−1 dry weight, ORAC values: 0.81–4.25 µmol TE mg−1 dry weight, superoxide anion scavenging activity values: 27.66–48.92 µmol TE mg−1 dry weight) were found in the cultivars. In particular, the cultivars Itrana, Apollo, and Maurino, showed a high amount of total phenols and antioxidant activity, and therefore represent a suitable natural source of biological compounds for use in terms of health benefits.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules24101998

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 59 · Cited by 85

Authors
Nicolì, F., Negro, C., Vergine, M., Aprile, A., Nutricati, E., Sabella, E., Miceli, A., Luvisi, A., & De Bellis, L.
Affiliations
  • University of Salento (IT)
  • Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy
Corresponding author
Vergine, Marzia
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-05-24
Volume
24
Issue
10
Pages
1998
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2945695042
Cited by
85
References
59
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • AIRUS (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Edible Oils Quality and Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Biochemistry › Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits
Keywords
olive leaf extract, phenolic compounds, antioxidant activity, total phenolic content, olive by-products, Apollo, DPPH assay, ORAC, superoxide radical scavenging
MeSH terms
Antioxidants, Calibration, Phenols, Plant Extracts, Plant Leaves, Olea, Limit of Detection, Phytochemicals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review