Cited by 157Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and ApplicationsRadioactivity and Radon MeasurementsChemical Reactions and Isotopes

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 266 of the 283 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of targeted alpha particle therapy for solid tumors.

Open access

Abstract

Targeted alpha-particle therapy (TAT) aims to selectively deliver radionuclides emitting α-particles (cytotoxic payload) to tumors by chelation to monoclonal antibodies, peptides or small molecules that recognize tumor-associated antigens or cell-surface receptors. Because of the high linear energy transfer (LET) and short range of alpha (α) particles in tissue, cancer cells can be significantly damaged while causing minimal toxicity to surrounding healthy cells. Recent clinical studies have demonstrated the remarkable efficacy of TAT in the treatment of metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the current consensus regarding the properties of the α-particle-emitting radionuclides that are potentially relevant for use in the clinic; the TAT-mediated mechanisms responsible for cell death; the different classes of targeting moieties and radiometal chelators available for TAT development; current approaches to calculating radiation dosimetry for TATs; and lead optimization via medicinal chemistry to improve the TAT radiopharmaceutical properties. We have also summarized the use of TATs in pre-clinical and clinical studies to date.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/molecules24234314

Cites

266 of 266 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Items 201–266 of 266

Flagged first, then by citations

17 of the 283 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Hall, E.J., and Giaccia, A.J. (2006). Radiobiology for the Radiologist, Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
  2. Hermanson, G.T. (2013). Bioconjugate Techniques, Academic Press. [3rd ed.].
  3. Loevinger, R., Budinger, T.F., and Watson, E.E. (1991). MIRD Primer for Absorbed Dose Calculations, Revised Edition, The Society of Nuclear Medicine, Inc.
  4. Gil, A.V., Pérez, M.C., Aroche, L.T., Pacilio, M., Botta, F., and Cremonesi, M. (2012, January 3–7). MCID: A personalized dosimetric tool associating voxel-based models with MCNP5. Proceedings of the IAEA International Conference on Radiation Protection in Medicine, Setting the Scene for the Next Decade, Bonn, Germany.
  5. Liu, 2001, DOSIMG: A 3D voxel-based Monte Carlo program for absorbed dose calculations, J. Nucl. Med., 42, 243P
  6. Kratochwil, 2015, Ac-225-DOTATOCan empiric dose finding for alpha particle emitter based radionuclide therapy of neuroendocrine tumors, J. Nucl. Med., 56, 1232

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 157

Metadata

Authors
Tafreshi, N. K., Doligalski, M. L., Tichacek, C. J., Pandya, D. N., Budzevich, M. M., El-Haddad, G., Khushalani, N. I., Moros, E. G., McLaughlin, M. L., Wadas, T. J., & Morse, D. L.
Affiliations
  • Moffitt Cancer Center (US)
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • West Virginia University (US)
Corresponding author
Morse, David L.
Venue
Molecules
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-11-26
Volume
24
Issue
23
Pages
4314
ISSN
1420-3049 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2990493095
Cited by
157
References
283
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 25 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 26 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 7
FWCI
2.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecules (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • The Research Repository @ WVU (West Virginia University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Melanoma Research Alliance
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA168536)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Radiation › Radioactivity and Radon Measurements
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Pharmaceutical Science › Chemical Reactions and Isotopes
Keywords
alpha-emitting radionuclides, radiopharmaceuticals, linear energy transfer, tumor targeting, radiation dosimetry, castration-resistant prostate cancer, metastatic prostate cancer, cell death mechanisms, solid tumors
MeSH terms
Alpha Particles, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humans, Neoplasms, Radioisotopes, Radiometry, Radiopharmaceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review