Targeting the Initiator Protease of the Classical Pathway of Complement Using Fragment-Based Drug Discovery
Abstract
The initiating protease of the complement classical pathway, C1r, represents an upstream and pathway-specific intervention point for complement-related autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. Yet, C1r-targeted therapeutic development is currently underrepresented relative to other complement targets. In this study, we developed a fragment-based drug discovery approach using surface plasmon resonance (SPR) and molecular modeling to identify and characterize novel C1r-binding small-molecule fragments. SPR was used to screen a 2000-compound fragment library for binding to human C1r. This led to the identification of 24 compounds that bound C1r with equilibrium dissociation constants ranging between 160–1700 µM. Two fragments, termed CMP-1611 and CMP-1696, directly inhibited classical pathway-specific complement activation in a dose-dependent manner. CMP-1611 was selective for classical pathway inhibition, while CMP-1696 also blocked the lectin pathway but not the alternative pathway. Direct binding experiments mapped the CMP-1696 binding site to the serine protease domain of C1r and molecular docking and molecular dynamics studies, combined with C1r autoactivation assays, suggest that CMP-1696 binds within the C1r active site. The group of structurally distinct fragments identified here, along with the structure–activity relationship profiling of two lead fragments, form the basis for future development of novel high-affinity C1r-binding, classical pathway-specific, small-molecule complement inhibitors.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Complement and microglia mediate early synapse loss in Alzheimer mouse models
Hong, S., Beja-Glasser, V. F., Nfonoyim, B. M., Frouin, A., Li, S., Ramakrishnan, S., Merry, K. M., Shi, Q., Rosenthal, A., Barres, B. A., et al. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad8373 · Cited by 3,343 · cited 2× · see citing works
“The classical pathway has also been shown to play causal roles in mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease [12] and has been genetically linked to other neurological disorders, such as schizophrenia [25].”
BackgroundTwenty years on: the impact of fragments on drug discovery
Erlanson, D. A., Fesik, S. W., Hubbard, R. E., Jahnke, W., & Jhoti, H. (2016) · Nature Reviews Drug Discovery · doi:10.1038/nrd.2016.109 · Cited by 1,000 · see citing works
Novel allele-dependent role for APOE in controlling the rate of synapse pruning by astrocytes
Chung, W.-S., Verghese, P. B., Chakraborty, C., Joung, J., Hyman, B. T., Ulrich, J. D., Holtzman, D. M., & Barres, B. A. (2016) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1609896113 · Cited by 242 · see citing works
Complement in the pathogenesis of Alzheimer’s disease
Morgan, B. P. (2018) · Seminars in Immunopathology · doi:10.1007/s00281-017-0662-9 · Cited by 194 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Rushing, B., Rohlik, D., Roy, S., Skaff, D., & Garcia, B.
- Venue
- Molecules
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-09-03
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 17
- Pages
- 4016
- ISSN
- 1420-3049
- Cited by
- 11
- References
- 4
- Language
- en
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (R21NS102766)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review