Cited by 71Diet and metabolism studiesDietary Effects on HealthNutritional Studies and Diet

Low Carbohydrate and Low-Fat Diets: What We Don’t Know and Why We Should Know It

Open access
Seid, Heather, Rosenbaum, Michael·2019·Nutrients

Abstract

In the 1940s, the diet-heart hypothesis proposed that high dietary saturated fat and cholesterol intake promoted coronary heart disease in “at-risk” individuals. This hypothesis prompted federal recommendations for a low-fat diet for “high risk” patients and as a preventive health measure for everyone except infants. The low carbohydrate diet, first used to treat type 1 diabetes, became a popular obesity therapy with the Atkins diet in the 1970s. Its predicted effectiveness was based largely on the hypothesis that insulin is the causa prima of weight gain and regain via hyperphagia and hypometabolism during and after weight reduction, and therefore reduced carbohydrate intake would promote and sustain weight loss. Based on literature reviews, there are insufficient randomized controlled inpatient studies examining the physiological significance of the mechanisms proposed to support one over the other. Outpatient studies can be confounded by poor diet compliance such that the quality and quantity of the energy intake cannot be ascertained. Many studies also fail to separate macronutrient quantity from quality. Overall, there is no conclusive evidence that the degree of weight loss or the duration of reduced weight maintenance are significantly affected by dietary macronutrient quantity beyond effects attributable to caloric intake. Further work is needed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu11112749

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 91 · Cited by 71

Authors
Seid, H., & Rosenbaum, M.
Affiliations
Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Rosenbaum, Michael
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2019-11-12
Volume
11
Issue
11
Pages
2749
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2984973671
Cited by
71
References
91
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 7 · 2018: 1
FWCI
0.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health (UL1 TR00040)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Diet and metabolism studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Dietary Effects on Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Nutritional Studies and Diet
Keywords
low-carbohydrate diet, low-fat diet, diet-heart hypothesis, coronary artery disease, obesity treatment, weight loss, weight maintenance, insulin, hyperphagia, hypometabolism, energy intake, dietary adherence, randomized controlled trials
MeSH terms
Diet, Healthy, Energy Intake, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Humans, Nutritive Value, Obesity, Risk Factors, Weight Loss, Diet, Fat-Restricted, Evidence-Based Medicine, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review