The DOI matches its Crossref record.
European Regulatory Framework and Safety Assessment of Food-Related Bioactive Compounds
Abstract
A great variety of functional foods, nutraceuticals, or foods with bioactive compounds are provided nowadays to consumers. Aware of the importance of the safety aspects, the food industry has to comply with different legal requirements around the world. In this review, the European regulatory framework for food-related bioactive compounds is summarized. The term ‘bioactive compound’ is not defined in the European regulations, however, since they can be part of food supplements, fortified foods, or novel food, they are included within the legal requirements of those corresponding types of foods or supplements. Lists of authorized compounds/foods appear in the correspondent regulations, however, when a new compound/food is going to be launched into the market, its safety assessment is essential. Although the responsibility for the safety of these compounds/foods lies with the food business operator placing the product on the market, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) carries out scientific evaluations to assess the risks for human health. To facilitate this procedure, different guidelines exist at the European level to explain the tier toxicity testing approach to be considered. This approach divides the evaluation into four areas: (a) toxicokinetics; (b) genotoxicity; (c) subchronic and chronic toxicity and carcinogenicity; and (d) reproductive and developmental toxicity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“their ventilatory responses during exercise are amplified, likely due to a lower CO2 threshold [10,11]”
From Use of Nutritional Strategies, Bioactive Compounds, and Dietary Supplements in Young Athletes: From Evidence to Potential Risks—A Narrative Review (2025) · cites this paper as [11]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- Aronson, 2017, Defining ‘nutraceuticals’: Neither nutritious nor pharmaceutical, Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol., 83, 8, 10.1111/bcp.12935 · DOI · Paper page
- Yasmeen, 2017, Establishing health benefits of bioactive food components: A basic research scientist’s perspective, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 44, 109, 10.1016/j.copbio.2016.11.016 · DOI
- Kalra, 2003, Nutraceutical-definition and introduction, AAPS PharmSci., 5, E25, 10.1208/ps050325 · DOI · Paper page
- Gul, 2016, Nutraceuticals and Functional Foods: The Foods for the Future World, Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr., 56, 2617, 10.1080/10408398.2014.903384 · DOI · Paper page
- McClements, 2015, The Nutraceutical Bioavailability Classification Scheme: Classifying Nutraceuticals According to Factors Limiting their Oral Bioavailability, Annu. Rev. Food Sci. Technol., 6, 299, 10.1146/annurev-food-032814-014043 · DOI · Paper page
- Kim, 2006, Regulations on health/functional foods in Korea, Toxicology, 221, 112, 10.1016/j.tox.2006.01.016 · DOI
- EFSA Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food (ANS) (2012). Guidance for submission for food additive evaluations. EFSA J., 10, 2760. · DOI · Paper page
- EFSA Scientific Committee (2009). Guidance on Safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations intended for use as ingredients in food supplements. EFSA J., 7, 1249. · DOI
- EFSA Scientific Committee (2014). Scientific Opinion on a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for the safety assessment of botanicals and botanical preparations. EFSA J., 12, 3593. · DOI
- EFSA Scientific Committee (2011). Scientific opinion on genotoxicity testing strategies applicable to food and feed safety assessment. EFSA J., 9, 2379. · DOI · Paper page
- EFSA Scientific Committee (2011). Guidance on the risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain. EFSA J., 9, 2140. · DOI · Paper page
- EFSA Scientific Committee (2018). Guidance on risk assessment of the application of nanoscience and nanotechnologies in the food and feed chain: Part 1, human and animal health. EFSA J., 16, 5327. · DOI · Paper page
- EFSA Scientific Committee (2011). Guidance on conducting repeated-dose 90-day oral toxicity study in rodents on whole food/feed. EFSA J., 9, 2438. · DOI
Cited by
Natural Bioactive Compounds from Food Waste: Toxicity and Safety Concerns
Vilas-Boas, A. A., Pintado, M., & Oliveira, A. L. S. (2021) · Foods · doi:10.3390/foods10071564 · Cited by 217
Calcaterra, V., Verduci, E., Cena, H., Magenes, V. C., Todisco, C. F., Tenuta, E., Gregorio, C., De Giuseppe, R., Bosetti, A., Di Profio, E., et al. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13061848 · Cited by 183
Sustainable and Health-Protecting Food Ingredients from Bioprocessed Food by-Products and Wastes
Minervini, F., Comitini, F., De Boni, A., Fiorino, G. M., Rodrigues, F., Tlais, A. Z. A., Carafa, I., & De Angelis, M. (2022) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su142215283 · Cited by 31
De Zan, D., Eletti, F., Fiore, G., Di Girolamo, E., Bozzini, G. G. M., Perico, V., Tosi, M., Norsa, L., Zuccotti, G., & Verduci, E. (2025) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu17132194 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Vettorazzi, A., López de Cerain, A., Sanz-Serrano, J., Gil, A. G., & Azqueta, A.
- Venue
- Nutrients
- Publisher
- MDPI AG
- Published
- 2020-02-26
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 613
- ISSN
- 2072-6643
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía, Industria y Competitividad, Gobierno de España (AGL2015-70640-R)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.