Cited by 90Eating Disorders and BehaviorsGut microbiota and healthRegulation of Appetite and Obesity

The role of the gut microbiome, immunity, and neuroinflammation in the pathophysiology of eating disorders

Open access
Butler, Michael J., Perrini, Alexis A., Eckel, Lisa A.·2021·Nutrients

Abstract

There is a growing recognition that both the gut microbiome and the immune system are involved in a number of psychiatric illnesses, including eating disorders. This should come as no surprise, given the important roles of diet composition, eating patterns, and daily caloric intake in modulating both biological systems. Here, we review the evidence that alterations in the gut microbiome and immune system may serve not only to maintain and exacerbate dysregulated eating behavior, characterized by caloric restriction in anorexia nervosa and binge eating in bulimia nervosa and binge eating disorder, but may also serve as biomarkers of increased risk for developing an eating disorder. We focus on studies examining gut dysbiosis, peripheral inflammation, and neuroinflammation in each of these eating disorders, and explore the available data from preclinical rodent models of anorexia and binge-like eating that may be useful in providing a better understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying eating disorders. Such knowledge is critical to developing novel, highly effective treatments for these often intractable and unremitting eating disorders.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu13020500

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 120 · Cited by 90

Authors
Butler, M. J., Perrini, A. A., & Eckel, L. A.
Affiliations
  • The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center (US)
  • Florida State University (US)
Corresponding author
Eckel, Lisa A.
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-02-03
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
500
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3128984844
Cited by
90
References
120
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4
FWCI
2.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (093311)
  • Medical Marijuana Clinical Outcomes Research Consortium (n/a)
  • National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (014320)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gut microbiota and health
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Regulation of Appetite and Obesity
Keywords
gut microbiota, gut dysbiosis, immune system, neuroinflammation, eating disorders, anorexia nervosa, bulimia nervosa, binge eating disorder, peripheral inflammation, rodent models, caloric restriction, binge eating
MeSH terms
Gastrointestinal Microbiome, Animals, Anorexia Nervosa, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Bulimia, Disease Models, Animal, Encephalitis, Humans, Immune System, Caloric Restriction, Bulimia Nervosa, Dysbiosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review