Cited by 75Probiotics and Fermented FoodsInfant Nutrition and HealthPregnancy and Medication Impact

Are Probiotics and Prebiotics Safe for Use during Pregnancy and Lactation? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Open access
Sheyholislami, Hauna, Connor, Kristin L.·2021·Nutrients

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Probiotic and prebiotic products have shown potential health benefits, including for the prevention of adverse pregnancy outcomes. The incidence of adverse effects in pregnant people and their infants associated with probiotic/prebiotic/synbiotic intake, however, remains unclear. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the evidence on adverse effects of maternal probiotic, prebiotic, and/or synbiotic supplementation during pregnancy and lactation and interpret the findings to help inform clinical decision-making and care of this population. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Scientific databases were searched using pre-determined terms, and risk of bias assessments were conducted to determine study quality. Inclusion criteria were English language studies, human studies, access to full-text, and probiotic/prebiotic/synbiotic supplementation to the mother and not the infant. In total, 11/100 eligible studies reported adverse effects and were eligible for inclusion in quantitative analysis, and data were visualised in a GOfER diagram. Probiotic and prebiotic products are safe for use during pregnancy and lactation. One study reported increased risk of vaginal discharge and changes in stool consistency (relative risk [95% CI]: 3.67 [1.04, 13.0]) when administering Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. reuteri. Adverse effects associated with probiotic and prebiotic use do not pose any serious health concerns to mother or infant. Our findings and knowledge translation visualisations provide healthcare professionals and consumers with information to make evidence-informed decisions about the use of pre- and probiotics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3390/nu13072382

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of 100 eligible studies of probiotic administration during pregnancy, only 28 reported adverse events; of these, only 11 reported adverse events potentially causally related to treatment, including gastrointestinal problems, nausea, and headache, but no serious health concerns were reported for mother or infant.

    “Of 100 eligible studies of probiotic administration during pregnancy, only 28 reported AEs. Of these, only 11 reported AEs that potentially could have a causal relationship with the treatment, including gastrointestinal problems, nausea, and headache; but no serious health concerns were reported for mother or infant.117”

    From Emerging issues in probiotic safety: 2023 perspectives (2023) · cites this paper as [117]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 69 · Cited by 75

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [30]Lasserson T.J. Higgins J.P.T. Chapter 1: Starting a review Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2 Higgins T.J. Chandler J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M.J. Welch V.A. Cochrane Chichester, UK 2021
  2. [35]Mauri M. Elli T. Caviglia G. Uboldi G. Azzi M. RAWGraphs: A Visualisation Platform to Create Open Outputs Proceedings of the 12th Biannual Conference on Italian SIGCHI Chapter Cagliari, Italy 18 September 2017 28:21 28:25
  3. [40]Higgins J.P. Savovic J. Page M.J. Elbers R.G. Sterne J.A. Chapter 8: Assessing risk of bias in a randomized trial Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.2 (Updated February 2021) Higgins J.P.T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M.J. Welch V.A. Cochrane Chichester, UK 2021
  4. [44]Higgins J.P.T. Li T. Deeks J.J. Chapter 6: Choosing effect measures and computing estimates of effect Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 6.1 (Updated September 2020) Higgins J.P.T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M.J. Welch V.A. Cochrane Chichester, UK 2020
  5. [46]Higgins J.P.T. Eldridge S. Li T. Chapter 23: Including variants on randomized trials Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020) Higgins J.P.T. Thomas J. Chandler J. Cumpston M. Li T. Page M.J. Welch V.A. Cochrane Chichester, UK 2020
  6. [60]Skokovic-Sunjic D. Clinical Guide to Probiotic Products Available in Canada. Indications, Dosage Forms, and Clinical Evidence to Date—2020 Edition Available online: www.probioticchart.ca (accessed on 19 November 2020)

Authors
Sheyholislami, H., & Connor, K. L.
Affiliations
Carleton University (CA)
Corresponding author
Connor, Kristin L.
Venue
Nutrients
Publisher
MDPI AG
Published
2021-07-13
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
2382
ISSN
2072-6643 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3181277708
Cited by
75
References
69
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 2
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nutrients (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Carleton University's Institutional Repository (MacOdrum Library, Carleton University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Infant Nutrition and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
Keywords
probiotics, prebiotics, synbiotics, pregnancy, lactation, maternal supplementation, adverse effects, safety, Lactobacillus rhamnosus, Lactobacillus reuteri, vaginal discharge, stool consistency, infant health
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Lactation, Pregnancy, Prenatal Exposure Delayed Effects, Risk Factors, Risk Assessment, Probiotics, Prebiotics, Synbiotics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review